Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-artwork (95 mails)

["Rajko M." <rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:45:25 -0500
Bryen M Yunashko <suserocks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...
> I think that vagueness is exactly why the question is being brought
> up. I get what you're saying, but at the same time, a lot of
> double-speak. (Congratulations, you're a true marketer! hehe)

I don't see vagueness. 
It is exactly how it is. Effort to create distribution is small
comparing to writing all software included, but that is still a lot of
work and skills. 

> ...
> I'm not opposed to these app splashes per se, but if we're going to
> claim branding on it, we probably need to start backing it up with
> qualified information. 

It should be enough that is compiled and installed as integral part of
distribution. There is no need for better qualification. That other
don't change splash tells that they have no resources to do so. 

Although, we can have openSUSE branded splash that is lesser intrusive
than current method to replace originals. 

Placing original in a openSUSE branded frame with Geeko in one of
corners will be win for both. Original image will be still there, and
openSUSE artist have to create only 1 (one) frame and apply it on all
splashes that we can find. 

Besides lesser effort, it will be symbolic message, that it runs within
openSUSE.

> ...
> "What is different about openSUSE GIMP versus my own distro's GIMP?" 

openSUSE GIMP runs on a better platform :)

-- 
Regards, Rajko
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-artwork+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-artwork+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx