On 20.11.14 11:05, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 20/11/2014 10:33, Alexander Graf a écrit :
Am 20.11.2014 um 09:08 schrieb Guillaume Gardet
: Le 19/11/2014 22:26, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 20:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:56, Guillaume Gardet wrote: Le 19/11/2014 17:52, Alexander Graf a écrit : > On 19.11.14 17:49, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : >>>>> Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>> Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit : >>>>>>>>> On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>> no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently >>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>> it): >>>>>>>>> * mx53loco >>>>>>>>> * colibri_t20_iris >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having >>>>>>>>> boards >>>>>>>>> to test >>>>>>>>> some images? >>>>>>>> I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet >>>>>>>> :(. If >>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop >>>>>>>> support for it >>>>>>>> though. >>>>>>> I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some >>>>>>> time. I >>>>>>> guess we have users which are not on -arm ML. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? >>>>>> A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a >>>>>> patch to >>>>>> enable bootz support? >>>>> I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz. >>>> bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version >>>> is it? >>> MX53LOCO U-Boot > version >>> >>> U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) >>> gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 >>> GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2 >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image >>> "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz". >> This is what the build log says: >> >> [ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl >> (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) >> [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 >> [..........done] >> [ 224s] Additional rpm output: >> [ 224s] warning: >> /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: >> >> >> Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY >> >> So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) > Ok, I removed the contrib and all links to it in the JeOS package. Good catch. :)
Lets see how things go once rebuilt. Wow, that u-boot tries to boot from network? That doesn't sound right. Thanks, with your fixed u-boot I can successfully boot: Perfect. :) Thanks for testing.
Fixed u-boot is on the way to Factory.
Should we enable JeOS-loco for 13.2? If yes, we would need updated u-boot from Base:System repo. I think it's unimportant enough to work as a Contrib, I'll just put one up and copy your more recent u-boot into it.
There is already a custom u-boot in 13.2:Ports for cubie* boards. So, you may just update this u-boot and add u-boot-mx53loco link. That way, we could avoid to have another contrib repo.
I don't think we want to move from a stable version of u-boot (2014.10) to an unstable one (2015.01-rc1). So if anything, we should kick off a maintenance update for u-boot on 13.2 and once submitted, copy the updated package into Ports. Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org