Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-arm (97 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-arm] armv5 progress
- From: Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:14:13 +0100
- Message-id: <2588117.QGxcy3IlcO@scherben>
Am Sonntag, 18. März 2012, 06:51:56 schrieb Bernhard M. Wiedemann:
..
We can do so, that would mean that we don't use hard floating point instructions
inside the soft fp ABI anymore.
It sounds sane to me, however, I do not know if we have limited us here on
puropose.
Some other compilation errors may come back, because the soft FP support may
not be
good enough.
Question is how many armv5 with and without fpu unit are out there.
Does it make sense to limit us to the ones with hard fpu ? Or would an armv5
port
make no sense at all then ?
bye
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH
email: adrian@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
..
our gcc46.spec had in the armv5 section...
- --with-float=softfp
which I changed to =soft for a local build (OBS does not let me branch
a broken package). And it made gcc work finally for armv5 - yay!
We can do so, that would mean that we don't use hard floating point instructions
inside the soft fp ABI anymore.
It sounds sane to me, however, I do not know if we have limited us here on
puropose.
Some other compilation errors may come back, because the soft FP support may
not be
good enough.
Question is how many armv5 with and without fpu unit are out there.
Does it make sense to limit us to the ones with hard fpu ? Or would an armv5
port
make no sense at all then ?
bye
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH
email: adrian@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |