Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-amd64 (100 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-amd64] SuSE 10.1: Non-tls version of glibc?
- From: Robert Schiele <rschiele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:18:17 +0200
- Message-id: <20060602161817.GC343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:34:24PM +0200, Bernd Paysan wrote:
> Do your programs exec() other programs with the same problems? Cadence does,
> and that's the problem. Apparently, there is no way to tell the Linux
> kernel that it should use another ld.so instead of /lib/ld-linux.so other
> than chroot - and chrooting just one specific X application is fairly
> difficult.
The trick my tool does is to move away _all_ binaries to a different place and
place a wrapper script like the natixshell script (from the example) to the
old place. Thus an exec call does no longer hurt.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
> Do your programs exec() other programs with the same problems? Cadence does,
> and that's the problem. Apparently, there is no way to tell the Linux
> kernel that it should use another ld.so instead of /lib/ld-linux.so other
> than chroot - and chrooting just one specific X application is fairly
> difficult.
The trick my tool does is to move away _all_ binaries to a different place and
place a wrapper script like the natixshell script (from the example) to the
old place. Thus an exec call does no longer hurt.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
| < Previous | Next > |