Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-amd64 (148 mails)

< Previous Next >
RE: 9.3 Slow I/O on RAID0 SATA
  • From: "Black, Alain" <ablack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 19:55:37 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <1066BDF1DAAA8040B54E0B5E27097310062CDE47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I noticed on reboot last night that it was complaining about reiserfs.ko
and reiser4.ko. I was not able to catch the entire message as it
scrolled by. But it appeared to not be properly implemented in my
running kernel.

Question:
Is there an issue with having bother reiserfs and reiser4 in the same
kernel?

-Alain.

-----Original Message-----
From: Black, Alain
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:43 PM
To: suse-amd64@xxxxxxxx
Subject: 9.3 Slow I/O on RAID0 SATA

I just installed 9.3 (64bit) last night on an MSI K8N NEO2 Platinum
mother board with an Rev E 939 3200+ chip currently over clocked from
2.0 GHz to 2.4 GHz, 1 GB of OCZ Platinum (2-3-2-5) Dual Channel RAM and
2 Seagate 160GB SATA drives in a RAID0 (striped).

Well, not fully striped, /boot is mirrored, then 1.3GB on each for swap
(un mirrored) and then the rest of the disks are stripped for /.

I have horrible I/O latency. Running the top command shows my I/O wait
to be around 89%.

I had this system running 9.2 (64bit) on a stand alone PATA Seagate
drive and it was amazingly fast. So I'm going to assume that I can rule
out the over clocking and focus on the I/O and the OS.

This is a fresh install of 9.3, not an upgrade from 9.2. DMA is enabled
in the BIOS for the SATA drives. I did not see the drives listed under
YAST2 for the IDE section to turn on DMA.

Does the above listed disk layout (Mirrored/jbod/striped) on the same
disk seam acceptable?

Where else should I start looking?

-Alain.

< Previous Next >