Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-amd64 (449 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-amd64] memtest on suse media
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:57:52 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <holle4jl1c.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Kian_Chang_Low@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> 1. (*) text/plain
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to compile a version from www.memtest.org, memtest86+-1.27,
> and I got the following error on my SuSE 9,
>
> gcc -E -traditional head.S -o head.s
gcc -m32...
> as -o head.o head.s
> head.S: Assembler messages:
> head.S:42: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC
> head.S:43: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> head.S:49: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC
> head.S:52: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> head.S:55: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> ... more of the same ...
>
> Was wondering how did you resolve this problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Kian Chang.
>
>
>
> Erich Boleyn <erich@xxxxxxxx>
> 10/15/2004 11:04 PM
>
> To
> suse-amd64@xxxxxxxx, Andreas Bittner <abittner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [suse-amd64] memtest on suse media (was: Re: [suse-amd64] memtest from
> sles9?)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Note to all: I work for AMD and have come across this problem, but am
> not any kind of official spokesman so Caveat Emptor, etc...]
>
> Andreas Bittner <abittner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Johannes B. Ullrich wrote:
>> > I used the precompiled bootable ISO from this page:
>> > http://www.memtest86.com/#download1
>>
>> what about memtest+, at http://www.memtest.org
>>
>> i dont know about the current memtest sles9 problems, but i asked suse
>> back in suselinux 9.0 64bit days that there wasnt any memtest on their
>> media back then, and they promised an updated one for 9.1. i dont
>> remember any more, but if i am not mistaken the 64bit 9.1 media also had
>
>> some problems with memtest, or memtest wasnt even included on those
>> either..
>>
>> just found my older postings to the list about memtest
>>
>> [1] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Feb/0048.html
>> [2] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Apr/0229.html
>>
>> will suse 9.2 improve in this area?
>
>
> I think the "www.memtest86.com" site now reflects the work done in
> the "memtest+" team at "www.memtest.org".
>
> In any case using Memtest 3.1x or the Memtest+ versions should both
> work fine on Athlon64 or Opteron boxes, and I do so all the time.
>
> My SuSE 9.1 install had an old version of memtest.bin with same kind
> of crash problems, and I just got the source, compiled in the most
> obvious way, then dropped the new "memtest.bin" in my /boot directory,
> and it worked fine.
>
>
> --
> Erich Stefan Boleyn <erich@xxxxxxxx> http://www.uruk.org/
> "Reality is truly stranger than fiction; Probably why fiction is so
> popular"
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@xxxxxxx, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SUSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
> 1. (*) text/plain
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to compile a version from www.memtest.org, memtest86+-1.27,
> and I got the following error on my SuSE 9,
>
> gcc -E -traditional head.S -o head.s
gcc -m32...
> as -o head.o head.s
> head.S: Assembler messages:
> head.S:42: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC
> head.S:43: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> head.S:49: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC
> head.S:52: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> head.S:55: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> ... more of the same ...
>
> Was wondering how did you resolve this problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Kian Chang.
>
>
>
> Erich Boleyn <erich@xxxxxxxx>
> 10/15/2004 11:04 PM
>
> To
> suse-amd64@xxxxxxxx, Andreas Bittner <abittner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [suse-amd64] memtest on suse media (was: Re: [suse-amd64] memtest from
> sles9?)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Note to all: I work for AMD and have come across this problem, but am
> not any kind of official spokesman so Caveat Emptor, etc...]
>
> Andreas Bittner <abittner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Johannes B. Ullrich wrote:
>> > I used the precompiled bootable ISO from this page:
>> > http://www.memtest86.com/#download1
>>
>> what about memtest+, at http://www.memtest.org
>>
>> i dont know about the current memtest sles9 problems, but i asked suse
>> back in suselinux 9.0 64bit days that there wasnt any memtest on their
>> media back then, and they promised an updated one for 9.1. i dont
>> remember any more, but if i am not mistaken the 64bit 9.1 media also had
>
>> some problems with memtest, or memtest wasnt even included on those
>> either..
>>
>> just found my older postings to the list about memtest
>>
>> [1] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Feb/0048.html
>> [2] http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Apr/0229.html
>>
>> will suse 9.2 improve in this area?
>
>
> I think the "www.memtest86.com" site now reflects the work done in
> the "memtest+" team at "www.memtest.org".
>
> In any case using Memtest 3.1x or the Memtest+ versions should both
> work fine on Athlon64 or Opteron boxes, and I do so all the time.
>
> My SuSE 9.1 install had an old version of memtest.bin with same kind
> of crash problems, and I just got the source, compiled in the most
> obvious way, then dropped the new "memtest.bin" in my /boot directory,
> and it worked fine.
>
>
> --
> Erich Stefan Boleyn <erich@xxxxxxxx> http://www.uruk.org/
> "Reality is truly stranger than fiction; Probably why fiction is so
> popular"
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@xxxxxxx, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SUSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
| < Previous | Next > |