Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-amd64 (449 mails)

["William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Mikhail Kuzminsky wrote:

> > In message from "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@xxxxxxxxxx> (Sun, 17 
> > Oct 2004 23:18:27 -0500):
> >
> > > Jyh-Shyong Ho wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Recently Intel released 64-bit compatible compiler 8.1 which supports
> > > > both Intel 64-bit x86 and AMD x86-64 chips. I wonder who has 
> > > > actually tried this new version of compiler on and AMD x86-64 system?
> > > > I downloaded the non-commercial version of the compiler and 
> > > > installed on my Opteron system, however, only the 32-bit version 
> > > > can be
> > > >
> > > > > > installed.
>   ifc/ifort 8.1.023 creates 64-bit executable, but ifc 8.1.018 builds 
> 32-bit executables only. And yes, all compilers modules itself (as the 
> libraries also, if I remember correctly) are 32-bit. We has 8.1.023 
> installed on SuSE 9.0 for Opteron.
>
> > > Really ?!?!?! What version, etc. ? I just spent about 50 minutes last
> > > night (literally) downloading updated Linux Intel FORTRAN & C compilers
> > > (8.1.19 FORTRAN, 8.1.22 C), what else do I need to get ? BTW, a 
> > > '32-bit'
> > > compiler might still be able to generate 64-bit code AOK, I *think*
> > > '32-bit' means it's a 32-bit app, 32-bit internal addressing, could
> > > still work OK to get 64-bit code .... Thanks in advance !!!!
> I am not sure that there are "versions before 8.1.023" which are able
> to build 64-bit binaries. Pls look to ReleaseNotes.
>
> Mikhail Kuzminsky
> Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry
> Moscow
>
> >

I found them & those are called l_fce_pc_8.1.nnn & l_cce_pc_8.1.nnn 
(note the 'e' after the cc or fc), thanks.