Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-amd64 (470 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-amd64] Max FS size?
- From: chu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Eugene Chu)
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 19:42:21 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <20040505194215.9913CB8B7C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Kevin Gassiot wrote:
>We have had problems with any filesystem larger than 1 TB. Although I
>have been assured that there are no problems with large filesystems,
>we can create a 1 TB filesystem, and things work fine... create it a
>megabyte over, and it seems to go fine, but when you start writing to the
>filesystem, it starts getting I/O errors. I seem to remember getting
>the answer that fdisk and parted cannot create LUNs larger than 1 TB,
>so the filesystems built on top of these LUNs have problems. I think
>I was told that I would have to create LUNs on the arrays smaller than
>1 TB, and use LVM to create a logical volume to get the larger size....
This is consistent with the symptoms I saw on my SuSE systems. It
happened in both the 32 and 64 bit versions of SLES 8.
Andi Kleen wrote:
>The 64bit OS can address more and the file systems can too. Your problems
>are most likely caused by the Adaptec device driver or the RAID firmware.
It is not a big problem for us to partition the big array into chunks
of 1 TB or less with the RAID controller, and present the partitions to
the host as different LUNs. That's what we'll do for this project.
thanks for all the replies,
eyc
>We have had problems with any filesystem larger than 1 TB. Although I
>have been assured that there are no problems with large filesystems,
>we can create a 1 TB filesystem, and things work fine... create it a
>megabyte over, and it seems to go fine, but when you start writing to the
>filesystem, it starts getting I/O errors. I seem to remember getting
>the answer that fdisk and parted cannot create LUNs larger than 1 TB,
>so the filesystems built on top of these LUNs have problems. I think
>I was told that I would have to create LUNs on the arrays smaller than
>1 TB, and use LVM to create a logical volume to get the larger size....
This is consistent with the symptoms I saw on my SuSE systems. It
happened in both the 32 and 64 bit versions of SLES 8.
Andi Kleen wrote:
>The 64bit OS can address more and the file systems can too. Your problems
>are most likely caused by the Adaptec device driver or the RAID firmware.
It is not a big problem for us to partition the big array into chunks
of 1 TB or less with the RAID controller, and present the partitions to
the host as different LUNs. That's what we'll do for this project.
thanks for all the replies,
eyc
| < Previous | Next > |