Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-amd64 (470 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-amd64] MSI K8T Neo {Via VT8237, Promise 20378} SATA + Suse9.1 - stable?
- From: Joel Wiramu Pauling <aenertia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 20:17:56 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <1084825068.3047.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Related...
Via Arena has a kernel module (looks like just a 2.4 series type) for
the hardware raid... any idea's when or if this will be incorporated
into the 2.6 suse codebase patches??
http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=297#raid
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 05:21, Jan wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> thank you for the hint on the known bug, however currently I already run
> without any sata modules in initrd and use the /dev/hd* interface - and
> still get kernel Oopses (but don't have the complete system freezing
> anymore). When booting from DVD in recue mode, I have also been able to
> access the VIA SATA interface through /dev/hda?, does that mean I must
> not load the sata_via module in any way?
>
> So, I understand this applies to all sata_* drivers!?
>
> I have heard now, that this bug is fixed in the experimental (kraxel?)
> kernel 2.6.5 - at least in a way that the system run stable when using
> the old /dev/hd? interface.
>
> During the installation (incl. successful online update), my yast2
> set-up got corrupted (rpms verify OK though). Now I can not start any
> yast2 modules anymore. Joel Wiramu Pauling describes a similar yet more
> problem in an earlier email to suse-amd64. Any explanation how this
> could have happened (and how it could be fixed)?
>
> What would be your recommendation? Format-n-reinstall maybe with
> different kernel-parameters? Or install experimental kernel. Which
> on-board SATA controller should I use? I heard that Promise only
> provides closed source modules?
>
> Gruss,
>
> Jan
>
>
>
>
>
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:09:25PM +0200, Jan Meyer wrote:
> >
> >>recently I tried to install Suse v9.1-AMD64 on my Athlon64 machine with
> >>an MSI K8T Neo-FIS2R (MS-6702) board. [Kernel was updated to 2.6.4-54.5]
> >
> >
> > There is a known bug in the 9.1 kernel that can cause problems
> > when you have the sata_* driver loaded, but use the old style builtin
> > IDE driver (which uses /dev/hd*). The sata driver can subtly
> > corrupt the state of the IDE driver in some cases when it is loaded,
> > which causes all kinds of strange problems later.
> >
> > Workaround is to remove the sata driver from
> > /etc/sysconfig/kernel:INITRD_MODULES and rebuild the initrd with
> > /sbin/mkinitrd and reboot.
> >
> > -Andi
> >
>
Via Arena has a kernel module (looks like just a 2.4 series type) for
the hardware raid... any idea's when or if this will be incorporated
into the 2.6 suse codebase patches??
http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=297#raid
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 05:21, Jan wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> thank you for the hint on the known bug, however currently I already run
> without any sata modules in initrd and use the /dev/hd* interface - and
> still get kernel Oopses (but don't have the complete system freezing
> anymore). When booting from DVD in recue mode, I have also been able to
> access the VIA SATA interface through /dev/hda?, does that mean I must
> not load the sata_via module in any way?
>
> So, I understand this applies to all sata_* drivers!?
>
> I have heard now, that this bug is fixed in the experimental (kraxel?)
> kernel 2.6.5 - at least in a way that the system run stable when using
> the old /dev/hd? interface.
>
> During the installation (incl. successful online update), my yast2
> set-up got corrupted (rpms verify OK though). Now I can not start any
> yast2 modules anymore. Joel Wiramu Pauling describes a similar yet more
> problem in an earlier email to suse-amd64. Any explanation how this
> could have happened (and how it could be fixed)?
>
> What would be your recommendation? Format-n-reinstall maybe with
> different kernel-parameters? Or install experimental kernel. Which
> on-board SATA controller should I use? I heard that Promise only
> provides closed source modules?
>
> Gruss,
>
> Jan
>
>
>
>
>
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:09:25PM +0200, Jan Meyer wrote:
> >
> >>recently I tried to install Suse v9.1-AMD64 on my Athlon64 machine with
> >>an MSI K8T Neo-FIS2R (MS-6702) board. [Kernel was updated to 2.6.4-54.5]
> >
> >
> > There is a known bug in the 9.1 kernel that can cause problems
> > when you have the sata_* driver loaded, but use the old style builtin
> > IDE driver (which uses /dev/hd*). The sata driver can subtly
> > corrupt the state of the IDE driver in some cases when it is loaded,
> > which causes all kinds of strange problems later.
> >
> > Workaround is to remove the sata driver from
> > /etc/sysconfig/kernel:INITRD_MODULES and rebuild the initrd with
> > /sbin/mkinitrd and reboot.
> >
> > -Andi
> >
>
| < Previous | Next > |