[opensuse-wiki] FlaggedRevs experiment
Now I'm removing last traces of extension and I'll try installation again.
Some of tables that I have to remove are called reader feedback. That is the latest feature in FlaggedRevs extension. And in the meantime, cleanup process revealed some missing colums in page table, which can mean improper installation. -- Regards, Rajko openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday 08 November 2009 21:12:21 Rajko M. wrote:
Now I'm removing last traces of extension and I'll try installation again.
Some of tables that I have to remove are called reader feedback. That is the latest feature in FlaggedRevs extension.
And in the meantime, cleanup process revealed some missing colums in page table, which can mean improper installation.
FlaggedRevs runs, after removing one offending hook that didn't allow view on any normal page, but the show is not over, after while another few broke. As it goes now I'll need help to stop disabling hooks :) That is task for tomorrow. In general in default configuration it looks good. Allows to check pages on few elementary facts like accuracy, depth and readability. Any page that is not checked get "Current revision (unreviewed)" mark. The Current revision is a link to: http://localhost/wiki/index.php?title=Help:Page_validation&action=edit&redlink=1 which I guess is help to user to understand process. I guess that, without hooks that are breaking one ofter another, whole thing looks promising. -- Regards, Rajko openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
Rajko,
2009/11/9 Rajko M.
On Sunday 08 November 2009 21:12:21 Rajko M. wrote:
Now I'm removing last traces of extension and I'll try installation again.
Some of tables that I have to remove are called reader feedback. That is the latest feature in FlaggedRevs extension.
And in the meantime, cleanup process revealed some missing colums in page table, which can mean improper installation.
FlaggedRevs runs, after removing one offending hook that didn't allow view on any normal page, but the show is not over, after while another few broke.
As it goes now I'll need help to stop disabling hooks :) That is task for tomorrow.
In general in default configuration it looks good. Allows to check pages on few elementary facts like accuracy, depth and readability.
Any page that is not checked get "Current revision (unreviewed)" mark. The Current revision is a link to: http://localhost/wiki/index.php?title=Help:Page_validation&action=edit&redlink=1 which I guess is help to user to understand process.
I guess that, without hooks that are breaking one ofter another, whole thing looks promising.
Awesome. I'm really looking forward to your final estimation of FlaggedRevs as our QA implementation. Thanks for all your work! Best, R
-- Regards, Rajko
openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
-- Rupert Horstkötter openSUSE Community Assistant http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rhorstkoetter Email: rhorstkoetter@opensuse.org Jabber: ruperthorstkoetter@googlemail.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
On Monday 09 November 2009 05:18:31 Rupert Horstkötter wrote:
Awesome. I'm really looking forward to your final estimation of FlaggedRevs as our QA implementation. Thanks for all your work!
There is bug report where update from PHP 5.2.5 to PHP 5.3 breaks hooks with a same messages I have. I have to find solution for that. -- Regards, Rajko openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
On Monday 09 November 2009 05:18:31 Rupert Horstkötter wrote:
Awesome. I'm really looking forward to your final estimation of FlaggedRevs as our QA implementation. Thanks for all your work!
After update to the newest Mediawiki and FlaggedRevs, both work fine. The default configuration presents flagged article revision , but there is link to "draft", so anyone can check the draft too. It seems to be right tool for strict content check. The major problem is that it will probably demand more of CSS to be added to current openSUSE one. More details will follow in a few days. -- Regards, Rajko openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
Rajko,
2009/11/12 Rajko M.
On Monday 09 November 2009 05:18:31 Rupert Horstkötter wrote:
Awesome. I'm really looking forward to your final estimation of FlaggedRevs as our QA implementation. Thanks for all your work!
After update to the newest Mediawiki and FlaggedRevs, both work fine. The default configuration presents flagged article revision , but there is link to "draft", so anyone can check the draft too. It seems to be right tool for strict content check.
Good News! One question on the Flagged/Draft revisions: Is it possible to start with a new Draft-only article? I mean to have only a Draft revision at first for new articles? If I understand you correct, we may be able to point the Community (Wiki-Forum) to the Draft revision for re-viewing then before we flag it as "approved" - that way we may implement Pseudo-Sandbox as you mentioned in thread "QA Process - FlaggedRevs VS Sandboxing" before.
The major problem is that it will probably demand more of CSS to be added to current openSUSE one.
Who needs to be aware of this? Is this interesting for FSundermeyer/Rlihm, i.e. do we need input from them? If so, let me know if I can be of any help here.
More details will follow in a few days.
Is there an approximate ETA? Henne started to discuss the possibilities we have to get started with the creation of the new Wiki and I'm on the same page that we should kick that off asap. That said, from my perspective, the topic QA should be decided before and the Guidelines should be ready (at least a draft version) Thanks, R
-- Regards, Rajko
openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
-- Rupert Horstkötter openSUSE Community Assistant http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rhorstkoetter Email: rhorstkoetter@opensuse.org Jabber: ruperthorstkoetter@googlemail.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
On Thursday 12 November 2009 04:32:25 Rupert Horstkötter wrote:
One question on the Flagged/Draft revisions: Is it possible to start with a new Draft-only article?
The article that is just created is marked as not reviewed, and everyone can see it. After editor or reviewer visit article and mark it as sighted (editors) or reviewed (reviewers) then mark is replaced with previously mentioned mark.
If I understand you correct, we may be able to point the Community (Wiki-Forum) to the Draft revision for re-viewing then before we flag it as "approved" - that way we may implement Pseudo-Sandbox as you mentioned in thread "QA Process - FlaggedRevs VS Sandboxing" before.
As you can see anyone can see any article revision from the very beginning, so it can be linked to forums and asked for review. The user feedback functionality I have to see how it will work. I got no time to play with that. You can check: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:SpecialPages Use Quality_assurance section to see what non logged user can see.
The major problem is that it will probably demand more of CSS to be added to current openSUSE one.
Who needs to be aware of this? Is this interesting for FSundermeyer/Rlihm, i.e. do we need input from them? If so, let me know if I can be of any help here.
More details will follow in a few days.
Is there an approximate ETA? Henne started to discuss the possibilities we have to get started with the creation of the new Wiki and I'm on the same page that we should kick that off asap. That said, from my perspective, the topic QA should be decided before and the Guidelines should be ready (at least a draft version)
Thanks, R
-- Regards, Rajko openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
On Thursday 12 November 2009 04:32:25 Rupert Horstkötter wrote:
Is there an approximate ETA?
It seems weekend is realistic time frame for few snapshots and accompanying text abut FlaggedRevs configuration possibilities.
Henne started to discuss the possibilities we have to get started with the creation of the new Wiki and I'm on the same page that we should kick that off asap. That said, from my perspective, the topic QA should be decided before and the Guidelines should be ready (at least a draft version)
ASAP is relative determination :) I don't see anything well organized starting to happen before end of next week. Q/A is one of the questions that we have to answer before we can go on. -- Regards, Rajko openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
On Thursday 12 November 2009 07:13:27 Rajko M. wrote: Hi,
On Monday 09 November 2009 05:18:31 Rupert Horstkötter wrote:
Awesome. I'm really looking forward to your final estimation of FlaggedRevs as our QA implementation. Thanks for all your work!
After update to the newest Mediawiki and FlaggedRevs, both work fine. The default configuration presents flagged article revision , but there is link to "draft", so anyone can check the draft too. It seems to be right tool for strict content check.
The major problem is that it will probably demand more of CSS to be added to current openSUSE one.
shouldn't be too much of a problem. More details would be welcome. What about the existing skins such as MonoBook - does the extension provide css for the MediaWiki default skins? -- Regards Frank Frank Sundermeyer, Technical Writer, Documentation SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg Tel: +49-911-74053-0, Fax: +49-911-7417755; http://www.opensuse.org/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) "Reality is always controlled by the people who are most insane" Dogbert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
On Thursday 12 November 2009 04:59:49 Frank Sundermeyer wrote:
More details would be welcome. What about the existing skins such as MonoBook - does the extension provide css for the MediaWiki default skins?
Yes, it has flaggedrevs.css and flaggedrevs.js in wiki/extensions/FlaggedRevs. The download link is on http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs . With our skin it doesn't work, at least with few functions that checked. -- Regards, Rajko openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
Frank Sundermeyer -
Rajko M. -
Rupert Horstkötter