Hi wiki team, I changed the terms used by the "InReview" template (from "other should not make any changes" to "should not make any major changes"), as it's rather stupid to prevent other people to improve the articles with minor addition (ie, spelling mistakes, or important information that must get their way on the wiki). Also, - are the "InRewiev", "Reviewed" on so on templates totally deprecated? Should we get rid of them to avoid possible confusion? - To Jonathan_R : I saw that you have dozen of articles currently "InReview". Is it not a better idea to work on a limited number of articles and to finish/complete the work on them, rather that working on a large number of articles and thus, preventing other people to take care of them? Regards, R. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Rémy Marquis wrote:

Hi,

Feel free to add your bugs in the list. The tags are here to avoid major changes. Also, it's rather not desirable to stop the work on in-going development documentation.

Regards,

R.

2010/2/1 Rastislav Krupanský :

...

Hi. If i´d like to add some annoying bugs on wiki to prevent repeated/unnecessary reporting bugs, how is the procedure? This article is under review. The contents are currently being evaluated and edited by User:Jonathan_R. Others should not make any changes. Or can i add the most annoying bugs in M1 myself? Thanks.

-- S pozdravom / Best regards,

Rasto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org

I agree as well. We want to encourage improvements to the documentation. Major changes should be discussed first, in my opinion. But on going improvements, spelling and grammar should certainly be encouraged. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 06:50, Rupert Horstkötter wrote:

Remy,

2010/2/1 Rémy Marquis :

...

Hi wiki team,

I changed the terms used by the "InReview" template (from "other should not make any changes" to "should not make any major changes"), as it's rather stupid to prevent other people to improve the articles with minor addition (ie, spelling mistakes, or important information that must get their way on the wiki).

+1, that makes perfect sense. Thanks for taking care and letting us know.

...

Also, - are the "InRewiev", "Reviewed" on so on templates totally deprecated? Should we get rid of them to avoid possible confusion?

I feel the templates valuable as you see at first glance what the status of a particular article is when accessing it. With the modified "InReview" template also the minor changes questions is addressed. That said, I'm not sure if the Templates are still to be considered with Rajko's Transition_table approach. I leave it up to Wiki seniors to declare them as deprecated but I'd appreciate if we could keep them/marry them with Transition_table due to the reason I outlined. Please let me know.

Thanks, R

...

- To Jonathan_R : I saw that you have dozen of articles currently "InReview". Is it not a better idea to work on a limited number of articles and to finish/complete the work on them, rather that working on a large number of articles and thus, preventing other people to take care of them?

Regards,

R.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Rémy Marquis wrote:

...

Hi,

Feel free to add your bugs in the list. The tags are here to avoid major changes. Also, it's rather not desirable to stop the work on in-going development documentation.

Regards,

R.

2010/2/1 Rastislav Krupanský :

...

Hi. If i´d like to add some annoying bugs on wiki to prevent repeated/unnecessary reporting bugs, how is the procedure? This article is under review. The contents are currently being evaluated and edited by User:Jonathan_R. Others should not make any changes. Or can i add the most annoying bugs in M1 myself? Thanks.

-- S pozdravom / Best regards,

Rasto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org

-- Rupert Horstkötter, open-slx gmbh openSUSE Board Member openSUSE Community Assistant http://en.opensuse.org/User:Rhorstkoetter Email: rhorstkoetter@opensuse.org Jabber: ruperthorstkoetter@googlemail.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Rupert Horstkötter wrote:

I feel the templates valuable as you see at first glance what the status of a particular article is when accessing it. With the modified "InReview" template also the minor changes questions is addressed. That said, I'm not sure if the Templates are still to be considered with Rajko's Transition_table approach. I leave it up to Wiki seniors to declare them as deprecated but I'd appreciate if we could keep them/marry them with Transition_table due to the reason I outlined. Please let me know.

I second your opinion. The templates (and first and foremost, the categorization of the articles) really help in having an overview of the work in progress. Like me, Jonathan told me that he still uses the "old" way with template, so I guess we will still use them if there are no objections. Rajko, could the transition guideline be readjusted to include this ? Thx. R. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org

On Monday 01 February 2010 06:35:45 Rémy Marquis wrote:

Hi wiki team,

I changed the terms used by the "InReview" template (from "other should not make any changes" to "should not make any major changes"), as it's rather stupid to prevent other people to improve the articles with minor addition (ie, spelling mistakes, or important information that must get their way on the wiki).

+1 IMO, we should address remaining issues as fast as possible. Major one is future wiki structure.

Also, - are the "InRewiev", "Reviewed" on so on templates totally deprecated? Should we get rid of them to avoid possible confusion?

Depends on how we are going to perform transfer of articles to new wiki. Using export from old wiki and import to new, then it is possible to remove tags using sed or some script when they are on wiki admin computer. That means there will be not much more work involved then to write script that will cleanup articles. If we go with manual copy paste method then we can remove template in process. Which one we will use depends on answer to question, do we have obligation to keep article history. For yes, we have to use export-import method, for no, we can use any method.

- To Jonathan_R : I saw that you have dozen of articles currently "InReview". Is it not a better idea to work on a limited number of articles and to finish/complete the work on them, rather that working on a large number of articles and thus, preventing other people to take care of them?

+1

Regards,

R.

-- Regards Rajko, openSUSE Wiki Team: http://en.opensuse.org/Wiki_Team People of openSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/People_of_openSUSE/About -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org