[opensuse] XFCE does not show window borders only on local login
Hello, I have a very weird situation. My Dad is running openSUSE 12.1 with XFCE desktop. One day something went wrong and the windowing system stopped working. So if he opens an application, it has no window border, so it cannot be moved and focus cannot be changed between applications. I enabled the remote management in Yast and logged in via VNC, but remote management gives a second desktop session, not his running session. If I log in via vnc (port 5901), then everything works fine, even if we open a vnc session from his local session the desktopn in ghe vnc session works fine. So, why would a local xfce session to the screen not have the windowing system, but a remote session via VNC does have it. Does anybody know what the difference is? I expect that the VNC session does not load certain config files, or override some, but which? We also tried to remove the .config directory in his home, but that does not solve the problem. Thanks -- Andre Truter | Software Consultant | Registered Linux user #185282 Tel: 082 785 7615 | http://www.trusoft.co.za ~ Microsoft: "You've got questions. We've got dancing paperclips." ~ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
My Dad is running openSUSE 12.1 with XFCE desktop. ... So if he opens an application, it has no window border, so it cannot be moved and focus cannot be changed between applications.
We had a similar problem and a work around was to delete the .cache directory in the users home directory. Hth Hajo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via $ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]* Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ? Tia Hajo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 03/13/2012 11:58 AM, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote:
Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via
$ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]*
Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ?
pekwm awesome fluxbox I am not sure but xfce should not be requiring these Also using zypper with no-recommends might be helpful in the beginning Togan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:58, Hans-Joachim Ehlers
Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via
$ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]*
Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ?
In KDE4, you can simply set the option to disable Nepomuk. It's on by default, but it's easy to switch off.. just a check box in the config, and it's off. You could easily propagate that option setting to all users if all users want to disable the feature. C. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:28:03 +0100
C
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:58, Hans-Joachim Ehlers
wrote: Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via
$ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]*
Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ?
In KDE4, you can simply set the option to disable Nepomuk. It's on by default, but it's easy to switch off.. just a check box in the config, and it's off. You could easily propagate that option setting to all users if all users want to disable the feature.
C.
Disabling Nepomuk does not affect tracker. In addition to other responses you can also go into Yast(2) under "Softwarw Management" and de-install tracker and all its dependencies. Tom -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 00:56, Thomas Taylor
C
wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:58, Hans-Joachim Ehlers
wrote: Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via
$ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]*
Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ?
In KDE4, you can simply set the option to disable Nepomuk. It's on by default, but it's easy to switch off.. just a check box in the config, and it's off. You could easily propagate that option setting to all users if all users want to disable the feature.
C.
Disabling Nepomuk does not affect tracker. In addition to other responses you can also go into Yast(2) under "Softwarw Management" and de-install tracker and all its dependencies.
.... I'm not that dumb... the OP commented on both KDE and Gnome... I presented a possible solution for KDE. When you use KDE, and you decide you do not want desktop indexing, disabling or turning off the indexer is a simple config change in the KDE setup.... C. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:58:36AM +0100, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote:
Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via
$ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]*
This is the wrong approach. Guess an update has to be published and then the tracker stuff is back. zypper rm $( rpm -qf /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]*) sound like the better approach to me. If /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]* files are available.
Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ?
As others have written: disable the indexing 'feature'. I don't get why it is enabled by default. But I'm not a GUI developer. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On 03/13/2012 11:47 AM, Lars Müller wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:58:36AM +0100, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote:
Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via
$ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]*
This is the wrong approach. Guess an update has to be published and then the tracker stuff is back.
zypper rm $( rpm -qf /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]*)
sound like the better approach to me. If /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]* files are available.
Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ?
As others have written: disable the indexing 'feature'. I don't get why it is enabled by default. But I'm not a GUI developer.
I was able to just do this: #rpm -qa | grep tracker | xargs rpm -e and I had no dependency issues. Probably depends on what you have installed though. Mark -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Lars Müller
As others have written: disable the indexing 'feature'. I don't get why it is enabled by default. But I'm not a GUI developer.
Because everyone "needs" a desktop search tool. That's why when I work on a windows machine I have to disable/remove Windows Search, Google Desktop, Roxio's search, Nero's search, etc, before the machine is usable. My customers are like, WOW! It's fast now...... When I tell them I removed it, they are like, "yeah, I never used it." We had this issue with that useless "beagle" years ago & it hasn't had a stable release in over 3 years. I can't imagine that more than 5% of users every even use a desktop search tool much less find it useful on a regular basis. But heaven forbid it not be included. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:39:40 -0400
Larry Stotler
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Lars Müller
wrote: As others have written: disable the indexing 'feature'. I don't get why it is enabled by default. But I'm not a GUI developer.
Because everyone "needs" a desktop search tool.
Actually the only those that "use" desktop "need" desktop search, all other need it (without quotes). Quantity of information that users handle today is huge and manual indexing overhead is not something that users have to take as normal. What for we have computer, if it will not help with indexing and search.
That's why when I work on a windows machine I have to disable/remove Windows Search, Google Desktop, Roxio's search, Nero's search, etc, before the machine is usable. My customers are like, WOW! It's fast now...... When I tell them I removed it, they are like, "yeah, I never used it."
I have no customers, but only friends, that installed all possible searches, desktop searches and internet browser bars as "free" add-on to some software they are interested in. They are equally surprised when such tools are reduced to one. Browsing is all of the sudden fast, when N+1 competing applications do not check web page that user wants to see and contact their homes over the Internet for add-on content. It is also pretty sure that main purpose of such applications is not desktop search and help to user, otherwise they will not stack one over the other, as they do, and slow down browsing. Comparing above with single desktop search, that doesn't have other home then your computer and no other purpose then to help you find information, is mixing apples and oranges.
We had this issue with that useless "beagle" years ago & it hasn't had a stable release in over 3 years.
Beagle's developers were C# skilled, which means not many and not with deep knowledge of Linux, which was demonstrated in few bugs. In attempt to create universal desktop search they did not take care to integrate Beagle in any particular desktop. It was strange application to any of them.
I can't imagine that more than 5% of users every even use a desktop search tool much less find it useful on a regular basis. But heaven forbid it not be included.
Desktop search this days, unlike Beagle times, is used without explicitly calling some search application. It is embedded in Main Menu Search, application starter (Alt+F2), and also in process of file metadata indexing and presentation in file managers and other applications. So, you can't say it is not used, but you are right that no more than 5% will be able to say they use desktop search if not asked for each specific desktop function where indexing and search are involved. Of course, all those that will follow on removing desktop search unconditionally will be able to say they don't use it, but that will be on their expense. They will have to remember where are all those files they acquired trough the time, and they will have to use explicitly applications to see, for instance, image or music file metadata. Also, I'm not happy with bugs, or with settings that are repeating the worst of Beagle's, like full throttle indexing that could be completely irrelevant for activity that I perform at the same moment, but for that I don't recommend each and every user to remove desktop search. It is past time that was sound advice. -- Regards, Rajko -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Quantity of information that users huge and manual indexing overhead is not something that users have to take as normal. What for we have computer, if it will not help with indexing and search.
But then please Intelligent Solutions and not tools which are "simple" minded like beagle, tracker, nepomuck .... There horizon ends where windows was 15 years ago. They are not cluster aware, they use large "databases", i can not use them from different locations/over the network. There is no way of configuring these tools from a user perspective. So these tools are NOT a solution for managing data. For that we would need a object oriented file system or at least a service approach meaning that we have a service ( Off by default but configurable from GUI frontend ) where applications can query this service OVER the network. And of course the data is NOT stored in a DB which is even a SINGLE file.* Such a service would scale from a local PC ( Standard Linux Environment Implementations ) to large networks. I think its already exist and it is called "search engine". All IMHO Hajo * I have already a user where the tracker DB is about 1GB large. Nice in a clustered environment running NFS and where users can login from any PC working on the same home directory. BTW: Since some programs have a dependency on tracker and the famous " disable" works not on a global scale i stay with the simple chmod. It keeps down what has to be kept down. Hard solutions for nightmare implementations. N�����r��y隊Z)z{.�ﮞ˛���m�)z{.��+�:�{Zr�az�'z��j)h���Ǿ� ޮ�^�ˬz��
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:44 +0100, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote:
So these tools are NOT a solution for managing data. For that we would need a object oriented file system or at least a service approach meaning that we have a service ( Off by default but configurable from GUI frontend ) where applications can query this service OVER the network.
Ok, you have exactly that; except it is on by default because there is no reason to have it off.
And of course the data is NOT stored in a DB which is even a SINGLE file.* Such a service would scale from a local PC ( Standard Linux Environment Implementations ) to large networks. I think its already exist and it is called "search engine".
You are changing the use-case. Tracker is, and Beagle was, a *desktop* search tool. And you are wrong that you can't access Tracker, and that you couldn't access Beagle, over the network. Both are possible and work, or worked, well. I used Beagle via it's *HTTP INTERFACE*; it worked really well and was my browser's home page for years. -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com OpenGroupware Developer http://www.opengroupware.us Adam Tauno Williams -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 23:06 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
That's why when I work on a windows machine I have to disable/remove Windows Search, Google Desktop, Roxio's search, Nero's search, etc, before the machine is usable. My customers are like, WOW! It's fast now...... When I tell them I removed it, they are like, "yeah, I never used it." Comparing above with single desktop search, that doesn't have other home
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:39:40 -0400 then your computer and no other purpose then to help you find information, is mixing apples and oranges.
+1 That is conflating implementations with concepts.
We had this issue with that useless "beagle" years ago & it hasn't had a stable release in over 3 years. Beagle's developers were C# skilled, which means not many and not with deep knowledge of Linux, which was demonstrated in few bugs. In attempt to create universal desktop search they did not take care to integrate Beagle in any particular desktop. It was strange application to any of them.
As someone who used Beagle extensively and dealt with Beagle developers.... the above is incorrect. Early version of Beagle had bugs - IT WAS THE FIRST TOOL OF IT'S KIND. There were also a few bugs in the early versions of the Mono runtime. The Beagle developer's were LINUX and GNOME guys through-and-through; I'd put just about anyone's knowledge of LINUX up against theirs any day of the week. And Beagle integrated deeply with numerous GNOME applications including Evolution. Sadly this it was the unfounded [verging on silly] anti-Mono bigotry plus "bad-taste-memory" that killed Beagle (and caused all the re-implementation effort that now gives us Tracker). It is silly how users have a bad experience with an application and then continue to cite and quote that experience for *years* [decades?] afterward, long after the bugs have been solved. It makes a very solid argument *against* release-early-release-often.
I can't imagine that more than 5% of users every even use a desktop search tool much less find it useful on a regular basis. But heaven forbid it not be included. Desktop search this days, unlike Beagle times, is used without explicitly calling some search application. It is embedded in Main Menu Search, application starter (Alt+F2),
You can run "tracker-needle" for a specific Tracker GUI. Kind of handy sometimes. -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com OpenGroupware Developer http://www.opengroupware.us Adam Tauno Williams -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 11:58 +0100, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote:
Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via $ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]* Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ?
Just "rm /etc/xdg/autostart/tracker-store.desktop" - And it won't start. Whaking the permissions of files in system folders is a bad idea. I have no idea what "Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage"; I don't see how that applies to tracker at all. -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com OpenGroupware Developer http://www.opengroupware.us Adam Tauno Williams -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via $ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]* Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ?
Just "rm /etc/xdg/autostart/tracker-store.desktop" - And it won't start. Sorry bu imho you are incorrect. It won't start during login but would not prevent other applications to start tracker and what ever search tool is installed. Install the GNOME file manager and you will see.
Whaking the permissions of files in system folders is a bad idea. I do not care as long it solve the problems of having tools searching and indexing millions of files which they should not. And no - i do not want to be forced to configure these tools to behave much more nicely.
I have no idea what "Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage"; I don't see how that applies to tracker at all.
Maybe there is somewhere a little readme that explains how a user can login from different PCs at the same time using the same home directory and is able to use tracker. Like i said - These tools are developed from developers using a single PC for users using a single PC. So they are broken by design from mpov but ymmv. EOD Hajo
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 16:20 +0100, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote:
Tracker seems to be the gnome counter part to the nepomuck /anaconda trash on KDE4. Since it has a mess of dependencies as well i decided to disable its execution via $ chmod 000 /usr/lib/tracker-[a-z]* Its looks like that the GNOME and KDE are only usefull for single user/ single PC usage. Does somebody knows a GUI for Linux which does NOT introduces these indexing crap ? Just "rm /etc/xdg/autostart/tracker-store.desktop" - And it won't start. Sorry bu imho you are incorrect. It won't start during login but would not prevent other applications to start tracker and what ever search tool is installed. Install the GNOME file manager and you will see.
Nope, nautilus does not use Tracker search. The only integration between nautilus and tracker is the ability to tag files; this is provided by the nautilus-extension-tracker-tags package (which can easily be removed, although I see no point, it doesn't stop nautilus from working if tracker is not active). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 13 Mar 2012, at 11:00 AM, Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote:
My Dad is running openSUSE 12.1 with XFCE desktop. ... So if he opens an application, it has no window border, so it cannot be moved and focus cannot be changed between applications.
We had a similar problem and a work around was to delete the .cache directory in the users home directory.
Yes! This did the trick! Thanks for the help -- Andre Truter | Software Consultant | Registered Linux user #185282 Tel: 082 785 7615 | http://www.trusoft.co.za ~ If at first you don't succeed; call it version 1.0 ~ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Andre Truter said the following on 03/13/2012 02:10 AM:
Hello,
I have a very weird situation.
My Dad is running openSUSE 12.1 with XFCE desktop. One day something went wrong and the windowing system stopped working. So if he opens an application, it has no window border, so it cannot be moved and focus cannot be changed between applications.
I'm normally a KDE4 user but Mr Rankin has tempted me to try lightweight desktops, and when I used XFCE that happened to me. ARGHHHH! And when I went back to KDE4 the borders had all gone as well ARGHHH!
We also tried to remove the .config directory in his home, but that does not solve the problem.
Under KDE4 there is a specific set of config files under ~/.kde4/ files ... I forget but they've been discussed here before. I removed those, restarted KDE4 and they were created and all was well. And all was well with XFCE as well. -- An awesome response to XYZZY is available with the full registered version of Revenge of the Killer Surf Nazi Robot Babes from Hell. Type REGISTER for additional information. — -- Revenge of the Killer Surf Nazi Robot Babes from Hell (Demo Version) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
participants (11)
-
Adam Tauno Williams
-
Andre Truter
-
Anton Aylward
-
C
-
Hans-Joachim Ehlers
-
Larry Stotler
-
Lars Müller
-
Mark Hounschell
-
Rajko M.
-
Thomas Taylor
-
Togan Muftuoglu