Do any of you have a clue why procmail would have started to spew out the error "Missing Action" in it's log file. I just noticed this today..and it hasn't done it before. I've not changed my procmail rules for any SuSE list in years. This is what it looks like... procmail: Missing action
From ben Wed Apr 9 23:32:51 2003 Subject: Re: [SLE] Firewire on SuSE 8.1 Folder: /home/ben/Mail/Suse-linux-e
procmail: Missing action
From ben Wed Apr 9 23:32:51 2003 Subject: Re: [suse-kde] KsCD Folder: SuSE-KDE
This seems really bizarre to me. I'm currently using promail 3.15.1. -- Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@whack.org Tell me what you believe.. I'll tell you what you should see.
Did you change any Firewall actions/rules ? -----Original Message----- From: Ben Rosenberg [mailto:ben@whack.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 10:38 PM To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: [SLE] procmail oddities. Do any of you have a clue why procmail would have started to spew out the error "Missing Action" in it's log file. I just noticed this today..and it hasn't done it before. I've not changed my procmail rules for any SuSE list in years. This is what it looks like... procmail: Missing action
From ben Wed Apr 9 23:32:51 2003 Subject: Re: [SLE] Firewire on SuSE 8.1 Folder: /home/ben/Mail/Suse-linux-e
procmail: Missing action
From ben Wed Apr 9 23:32:51 2003 Subject: Re: [suse-kde] KsCD Folder: SuSE-KDE
This seems really bizarre to me. I'm currently using promail 3.15.1. -- Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@whack.org Tell me what you believe.. I'll tell you what you should see. -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
Nope. I haven't. But I did go from 2.4.18 (Under 8.0) to 2.4.20 (Under 8.0 as well). This could be the difference. But since I'll be doing 8.2 very soon. I'm not gonna bother hunting this down. Nevermind...it's probably the kernel update sent something wanky. Thanks though. * W.D.McKinney (dee@akwireless.net) [030409 23:45]: ->Did you change any Firewall actions/rules ? -> ->-----Original Message----- ->From: Ben Rosenberg [mailto:ben@whack.org] ->Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 10:38 PM ->To: suse-linux-e@suse.com ->Subject: [SLE] procmail oddities. -> -> ->Do any of you have a clue why procmail would have started to spew out ->the error "Missing Action" in it's log file. I just noticed this ->today..and it hasn't done it before. I've not changed my procmail rules ->for any SuSE list in years. -> ->This is what it looks like... -> -> ->procmail: Missing action ->>From ben Wed Apr 9 23:32:51 2003 ->Subject: Re: [SLE] Firewire on SuSE 8.1 ->Folder: /home/ben/Mail/Suse-linux-e -> ->procmail: Missing action ->>From ben Wed Apr 9 23:32:51 2003 ->Subject: Re: [suse-kde] KsCD ->Folder: SuSE-KDE -- Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@whack.org Tell me what you believe.. I'll tell you what you should see.
* Ben Rosenberg
Do any of you have a clue why procmail would have started to spew out the error "Missing Action" in it's log file. I just noticed this today..and it hasn't done it before. I've not changed my procmail rules for any SuSE list in years.
This is what it looks like...
procmail: Missing action
From ben Wed Apr 9 23:32:51 2003 Subject: Re: [SLE] Firewire on SuSE 8.1 Folder: /home/ben/Mail/Suse-linux-e
procmail: Missing action
From ben Wed Apr 9 23:32:51 2003 Subject: Re: [suse-kde] KsCD Folder: SuSE-KDE
This seems really bizarre to me. I'm currently using promail 3.15.1.
Look for a recipie beginning line with one or more conditions that has no _delivery_ or other action line to end the recipie, ie: :0: # begin recipie * ^TO_ben@whack.org # condition, to/cc/bcc ben@whack.org # missing action/delivery or post or private mail to me your ~/.procmail/rc.maillists file and we/I can look it over. -- Patrick Shanahan Please avoid TOFU and trim >quotes< http://wahoo.no-ip.org Registered Linux User #207535 icq#173753138 @ http://counter.li.org Linux, a continuous *learning* experience
participants (3)
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
Patrick Shanahan
-
W.D.McKinney