Selected Webpage Citations of Copyright Law History - OT
http://www.ecosyn.us/SCO_v_IBM_copyright_issues.html * Since 1976, mandatory requirements for copyrighted works have required deposit of copies with the Library of Congress within 3 months of first publication. Unless Unix source code is in the Library of Congress it is not copyrighted. Unless Unix System V is in the Library of Congress, it is in violation of the 1976 revisions. Before 1976 "promptly" depositing copies was mandatory, defined in caselaw as within one year of first publication. * Unix System V is a collection of modules, mostly public domain through copyright forfeiture between 1969 and 1976. * It is defined as fraud under the 1909 Copyright Act [§ 105] "shall insert or impress any notice of copyright required by this title, or words of the same purport, in or upon any uncopyrighted article" to post-fix copyright notices upon works not qualifying for copyright. * None of the 1976, 1980, or 1989 adjustments to Copyright laws and the Berne Treaty permitted retroactive copyrights to previously forfeiting or public domain works. * Unix System V is basically public domain in the catagory of a compilation or anthology. Only new material added after 1976, or after 1980 (when computer programs first became copyrightable) could possibly qualify for copyright status, and only those collections which complied with mandatory deposit with the Library of Congress. Everything else is not in compliance with copyright laws and treaties. -- David C. Johanson Linux Counter # 116410 Powered by SuSE Linux 7.1 People who behold a phenomenon will often extend their thinking beyond it; people who merely hear about the phenomenon will not be moved to think at all. -- Goethe
SUSE-LINUX-E FAQ: Q2. What is appropriate content for the list? A2. Questions about configuration, maintenance, and implementation of SuSE Linux. The emphasis is on the x86 platform since we have separate lists for AXP, Sparc, IA64, and PPC. Q3. What is not appropriate content for the list? A3. Commercial postings of any kind, job postings, non-computer/Linux related material. Because of the large size of the list (1500 subscribers and ~200 messages per day), flame wars and off-topic posting can sometimes result in you being unsubscribed and, in extreme cases, banned from the list. Also, please unsubscribe now if you planning on posting advocacy-type things. We have a list specifically devoted to these sorts of discussion, suse-ot. Email suse-ot-subscribe@suse.com to subscribe.
David Johanson wrote:
http://www.ecosyn.us/SCO_v_IBM_copyright_issues.html
* Since 1976, mandatory requirements for copyrighted works have required deposit of copies with the Library of Congress within 3 months of first publication. Unless Unix source code is in the Library of Congress it is not copyrighted. Unless Unix System V is in the Library of Congress, it is in violation of the 1976 revisions. Before 1976 "promptly" depositing copies was mandatory, defined in caselaw as within one year of first publication.
* Unix System V is a collection of modules, mostly public domain through copyright forfeiture between 1969 and 1976.
* It is defined as fraud under the 1909 Copyright Act [§ 105] "shall insert or impress any notice of copyright required by this title, or words of the same purport, in or upon any uncopyrighted article" to post-fix copyright notices upon works not qualifying for copyright.
* None of the 1976, 1980, or 1989 adjustments to Copyright laws and the Berne Treaty permitted retroactive copyrights to previously forfeiting or public domain works.
* Unix System V is basically public domain in the catagory of a compilation or anthology. Only new material added after 1976, or after 1980 (when computer programs first became copyrightable) could possibly qualify for copyright status, and only those collections which complied with mandatory deposit with the Library of Congress. Everything else is not in compliance with copyright laws and treaties.
Interesting, SCO's case reminds me of the story of the dog who lost a bone trying to catch its shadow, enthusiasm without thought when seeing the shadow of a case looks like leading them off a precipice. They probably banked on IBM buying them out or settling quietly --- How wrong they were. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer Linux Only Shop.
SUSE-LINUX-E FAQ: Q2. What is appropriate content for the list? A2. Questions about configuration, maintenance, and implementation of SuSE Linux. The emphasis is on the x86 platform since we have separate lists for AXP, Sparc, IA64, and PPC. Q3. What is not appropriate content for the list? A3. Commercial postings of any kind, job postings, non-computer/Linux related material. Because of the large size of the list (1500 subscribers and ~200 messages per day), flame wars and off-topic posting can sometimes result in you being unsubscribed and, in extreme cases, banned from the list. Also, please unsubscribe now if you planning on posting advocacy-type things. We have a list specifically devoted to these sorts of discussion, suse-ot. Email suse-ot-subscribe@suse.com to subscribe.
On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 10:18, S.R.Glasoe wrote:
SUSE-LINUX-E FAQ:
Q2. What is appropriate content for the list? A2. Questions about configuration, maintenance, and implementation of SuSE Linux. The emphasis is on the x86 platform since we have separate lists for AXP, Sparc, IA64, and PPC.
Q3. What is not appropriate content for the list? A3. Commercial postings of any kind, job postings, non-computer/Linux related material. Because of the large size of the list (1500 subscribers and ~200 messages per day), flame wars and off-topic posting can sometimes result in you being unsubscribed and, in extreme cases, banned from the list. Also, please unsubscribe now if you planning on posting advocacy-type things. We have a list specifically devoted to these sorts of discussion, suse-ot. Email suse-ot-subscribe@suse.com to subscribe.
Can people stop spamming this crap. If you have an issue with someone's OT posting, please spam them off list. Thank you, Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 13 March 2004 01:18 pm, S.R.Glasoe wrote:
SUSE-LINUX-E FAQ:
Q2. What is appropriate content for the list? A2. Questions about configuration, maintenance, and implementation of SuSE Linux. The emphasis is on the x86 platform since we have separate lists for AXP, Sparc, IA64, and PPC.
Q3. What is not appropriate content for the list? A3. Commercial postings of any kind, job postings, non-computer/Linux related material. Because of the large size of the list (1500 subscribers and ~200 messages per day), flame wars and off-topic posting can sometimes result in you being unsubscribed and, in extreme cases, banned from the list. Also, please unsubscribe now if you planning on posting advocacy-type things. We have a list specifically devoted to these sorts of discussion, suse-ot. Email suse-ot-subscribe@suse.com to subscribe.
These strong-armed tactics of posting excerpts from the newly established guidelines are not very productive in accomplishing the objective of persuading people to discuss this topic elsewhere. Someone had the decorum to contact me off list and explained the situation in terms which made sense, providing background, and clarification. If you try to Statzi(sp) me, or others like me, the result will probably be more of what you don't like. So, for folks who don't know. The list admins believe the degree to which the ongoing lawsuit has dominated the list detracts from the primary focus of the list, and have therefor asked we take such discussions elsewhere. But, as always, do what thou wilt. STH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAU1aDwX61+IL0QsMRAtV0AKCy4oVi3tFsOMSKuGTvqvG7CHxVMwCeMQdy lerajP3xIU33EZ63SSbIUB0= =QWnR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
* Steven T. Hatton
These strong-armed tactics of posting excerpts from the newly
^^^^^^^
established guidelines are not very productive in accomplishing the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ objective of persuading people to discuss this topic elsewhere.
You may be new but the "guidelines" are not. Excerpt from
suse-linux-e-help dated 14 Jan 2002 03:35:25 -0000:
----Some Frequently Asked, Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. What is the suse-linux-e mailing list?
A1. SLE is a high volume, unmoderated mailing list for general
discussions about SuSE Linux in English. In other words,
it's a wild, largely unsupervised, collection of Linux
users that will flood your mailbox with 100-200 messages
per day. It's also a great place to get help with your
SuSE Linux system or have discussions about Linux.
Q2. What is appropriate content for the list?
A2. Questions about configuration, maintenance, and implementation
of SuSE Linux. The emphasis is on the x86 platform since we have
separate lists for AXP, Sparc, IA64, and PPC.
Q3. What is not appropriate content for the list?
A3. Commercial postings of any kind, job postings, non-computer/Linux
related material. Because of the large size of the list (1500
subscribers and ~200 messages per day), flame wars and off-topic
posting can sometimes result in you being unsubscribed and, in
extreme cases, banned from the list. Also, please unsubscribe
now if you planning on posting advocacy-type things. There are
lots of advocacy newsgroups such as comp.os.linux.advocacy.
And/but this was before suse-ot existed (announced 18 June 2003 by
Christopher Mahwood
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 13 March 2004 02:31 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Steven T. Hatton
[03-13-04 13:44]: These strong-armed tactics of posting excerpts from the newly
^^^^^^^
established guidelines are not very productive in accomplishing the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
objective of persuading people to discuss this topic elsewhere.
You may be new but the "guidelines" are not. Excerpt from suse-linux-e-help dated 14 Jan 2002 03:35:25 -0000:
Ok then newly emphasized guidelines. I've been on this list since SuSE has had an office in the US -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAU2LQwX61+IL0QsMRAhWEAJ9GcNgJL34RK73pDKMTnpx5UIy77gCg3tz0 HQNXpoti3RTfM1Tqia3jFy4= =9U4b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi, On Saturday 13 March 2004 19:44, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
On Saturday 13 March 2004 01:18 pm, S.R.Glasoe wrote:
SUSE-LINUX-E FAQ:
Q2. What is appropriate content for the list? A2. Questions about configuration, maintenance, and implementation of SuSE Linux. The emphasis is on the x86 platform since we have separate lists for AXP, Sparc, IA64, and PPC.
Q3. What is not appropriate content for the list? A3. Commercial postings of any kind, job postings, non-computer/Linux related material. Because of the large size of the list (1500 subscribers and ~200 messages per day), flame wars and off-topic posting can sometimes result in you being unsubscribed and, in extreme cases, banned from the list. Also, please unsubscribe now if you planning on posting advocacy-type things. We have a list specifically devoted to these sorts of discussion, suse-ot. Email suse-ot-subscribe@suse.com to subscribe.
These strong-armed tactics of posting excerpts from the newly established guidelines are not very productive in accomplishing the objective of persuading people to discuss this topic elsewhere. Someone had the decorum to contact me off list and explained the situation in terms which made sense, providing background, and clarification.
If you try to Statzi(sp) me, or others like me, the result will probably be more of what you don't like.
So, for folks who don't know. The list admins believe the degree to which the ongoing lawsuit has dominated the list detracts from the primary focus of the list, and have therefor asked we take such discussions elsewhere.
I'm sure It wasn't meant personal and it would be good if you wouldn't take it that way either. While you're right that it would be nicer - and on the individual case more effective/helpful - you should also understand, that this would ask a lot of effort from the side of those that try to make you (and others of course) aware of the "primary focus" of this list. By quoting from the SUSE-LINUX-E FAQ (something that is sent out to every subscriber) it could - hopefully - make not only the one poster but the other list memebers as well aware of this point (something that - by definition - could not be achieved by writing a personal e-mail to you or any other "offender"). Greetings from Bremen hartmut
participants (8)
-
David Johanson
-
Hartmut Meyer
-
Joe Sullivan
-
Matthew Johnson
-
Patrick Shanahan
-
S.R.Glasoe
-
Sid Boyce
-
Steven T. Hatton