INTEL (82547) Gigabit (P4C800E-DELUXE) with the speed of a snail ;-)
Did any of you get the above lan-card/implementation to run in: 1: speed=100 dublex=2 or 2: AutoNeg=0x08 (100 mbit / full dublex) Any reply/solution will be recieved with great interest Johan
Johan wrote:
Did any of you get the above lan-card/implementation to run in:
1: speed=100 dublex=2
or
2: AutoNeg=0x08 (100 mbit / full dublex)
Any reply/solution will be recieved with great interest
Johan
"man ethtool", it seems to have all the options you need. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer Linux Only Shop.
Mandag 17 maj 2004 17:25 skrev Sid Boyce:
Johan wrote:
Did any of you get the above lan-card/implementation to run in:
1: speed=100 dublex=2
or
2: AutoNeg=0x08 (100 mbit / full dublex)
Any reply/solution will be recieved with great interest
Johan
"man ethtool", it seems to have all the options you need. Regards Sid.
Of course ........ (I must have went blind solving the issue)
-- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer Linux Only Shop.
On Monday 17 May 2004 10:49 am, Johan wrote:
Mandag 17 maj 2004 17:25 skrev Sid Boyce:
Johan wrote:
Did any of you get the above lan-card/implementation to run in:
1: speed=100 dublex=2
or
2: AutoNeg=0x08 (100 mbit / full dublex)
Any reply/solution will be recieved with great interest
Johan
"man ethtool", it seems to have all the options you need. Regards Sid. Hi,
I suspect that things may go bad when the process encounters the word "DUBLEX" when it is expecting "DUPLEX". PeterB -- -- Proud to use SuSE Linux, since 5.2 Loving using SuSE Linux 8.2 MyBlog http://vancampen.org/blog/ Currently listening to The Resophonics http://www.resophonics.com/music.html --
Mandag 17 maj 2004 18:09 skrev Peter B Van Campen:
On Monday 17 May 2004 10:49 am, Johan wrote:
Mandag 17 maj 2004 17:25 skrev Sid Boyce:
Johan wrote:
Did any of you get the above lan-card/implementation to run in:
1: speed=100 dublex=2
or
2: AutoNeg=0x08 (100 mbit / full dublex)
Any reply/solution will be recieved with great interest
Johan
"man ethtool", it seems to have all the options you need. Regards Sid.
Hi,
I suspect that things may go bad when the process encounters the word "DUBLEX" when it is expecting "DUPLEX".
That typo only happend in here ;-) But I caught the developers at Intel.com As the 82547 based lan is not mentioned in the accompanying material in the kernel doc's it could be they still have a few issues ;-)
PeterB
-- --
Proud to use SuSE Linux, since 5.2 Loving using SuSE Linux 8.2
MyBlog http://vancampen.org/blog/
Currently listening to The Resophonics http://www.resophonics.com/music.html
--
participants (3)
-
Johan
-
Peter B Van Campen
-
Sid Boyce