[SLE] SPAM: Why is everything from suse-linux-e@suse.com labeled SPAM?
Anyone have an answer as to why everything from suse-linux-e@suse.com labeled SPAM?
Each reply to a reply then has an added SPAM (e.g.: SPAM: Re: SPAM: Re: [SLE] Protecting ...)
Any fix available?
Yeah, but it involves work by lazy people, like looking at the Subject line of their message and editing it. I don't know where the word "Spam" gets into the mix, 'cause I don't see it. I use kmail here and don't have the problem. Fred
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2006-10-14 at 07:41 -0500, Stevens wrote:
Anyone have an answer as to why everything from suse-linux-e@suse.com labeled SPAM?
Each reply to a reply then has an added SPAM (e.g.: SPAM: Re: SPAM: Re: [SLE] Protecting ...)
Any fix available?
Yeah, but it involves work by lazy people, like looking at the Subject line of their message and editing it. I don't know where the word "Spam" gets into the mix, 'cause I don't see it. I use kmail here and don't have the problem.
No, it involves some one at SuSE IT department reconfiguring / retraining their SpamAssassin Bayessian database. The word "SPAM" is added by a server at SuSE mail entry. If you don't see it, it is because something on your side is erasing it. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFMOZytTMYHG2NR9URAveoAJ4wcSR63jvtdzSLYPL8lKZ0kHbEsgCdHP35 OkAo7SQ1Ht/1Fyo8FhGDQQ8= =J97F -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------- On 14 October 2006 14:30, Carlos E. R. wrote: --------
No, it involves some one at SuSE IT department reconfiguring / retraining their SpamAssassin Bayessian database. The word "SPAM" is added by a server at SuSE mail entry.
I agree with Carlos. My ISP doesn't aloud to put more then 25 destinations in my e-mail messages. This way I can't send a lot of Christmas's cards :) I guess that is their anti spam policy. But, for a certain fee, then I'm aloud to send to as many as I want :-) So I use the postfix server that suse installs and I'm able to send e-mails as I want. Of course that the messages that get out of my pc aren't formally correct. The IP doesn't match some e-mail addresses. But I'm doing no spam, cause all the e-mails do exist. So, I guess that the new config of the smpt servers of SuSE detects this situations. -- Regards, Lívio Cipriano
-------- On 14 October 2006 15:36, Lívio Cipriano wrote: --------
So I use the postfix server that suse installs and I'm able to send e-mails as I want. Of course that the messages that get out of my pc aren't formally correct. The IP doesn't match some e-mail addresses. But I'm doing no spam, cause all the e-mails do exist.
So, I guess that the new config of the smpt servers of SuSE detects this situations.
I guess I'm wrong. This time the SPAM didn't show up in my Sunject... -- Regards, Lívio Cipriano
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2006-10-14 at 15:36 +0100, Lívio Cipriano wrote:
So, I guess that the new config of the smpt servers of SuSE detects this situations.
No, it is not that. If you look at the email sent by Stevens on an account that doesn't have local spamassassin - for instance, on a gmail web client - you can see the original headers as sent from SuSE. It contain these: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay1.suse.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.9 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT, BAYES_99, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, MY_LINUX X-Spam-Level: **** The antispam run was done at "Relay1.suse.de". The Bayessian database said it has 99% or more proability of being spam. Yours contains these headers instead: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT, BAYES_80, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS, MY_LINUX X-Spam-Level: **** At a bayes level of 80, it was not labeled spam. Fortunately for you (and me) SuSE mail servers do not reject email sent from our own postfix. And, the word "SPAM" dissapeared because I manually removed it when answering. What they have got to do is dump their entire Bayessian database and retrain it from scratch - and dissable autotraining. :-| - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFMPs+tTMYHG2NR9URAr7wAKCHrc1NlZvvm+A3r4LpNJXPgtcagQCeNMjR us+m5zhyAj7IBEtKRfhMyQI= =3yM7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Carlos E. R. -
Lívio Cipriano -
Stevens