Re: [SLE] CNN, SusE, Lousy PR
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 03:00 AM 05/03/00 -1000, you wrote: Hi, Avi, Avi Schwartz wrote:
I don't understand what the noise is all about. Roland Dyroff is right about every point he brought up. I love Linux and I use it as my main platform both at home and at work but I have to agree that Linux is not quite ready for the desktop. It is coming close, but it is not there yet.
That depends on whose desktop you are referring to. Most corporations have an IT department to configure software and hardware for the users. If a company deploys Linux, they should hire Linux administrators. Likewise, if they deploy NT on the desktop, they usually hire MCP's or MCSE's. What Linux is not ready for is the so-called "power user" who downloads some gee-whiz GUITweeker from download.com, changes to look of his screen and thinks he's a Guru. This individual will try to install Linux and destroy everything (because he knows all about computers and therefore does not need to read anything), and blames Linux for corrupting his data when the readme clearly said to run scandisk and defrag first. My wife doesn't give two hoots about the OS. She can use Linux like a pro because the GUI is similar to Windows and StarOffice works just like MS Office. It prints when she clicks on the printer icon. (The virtual desktops still confuses her, though.)
For example, to be ready for the desktop it must have, among other things, the ability to handle MS Office documents (Word, Excel, etc.) with 100% accuracy. Whether we like it or not, that is what 95% of
With this criteria, Microsoft Word is not ready for the desktop. Have you ever taken a Word 6 file and loaded it into Word 97? Only if it is a simple one-page memo do I get 100% accuracy. I have fewer problems with a StarOffice generated document saved as Word - here I only have to replace the smiley-face bullets with real bullets and it's good to go.
businesses are using today, and that it what people use at home, since they need to ability to exchange documents between work and home. I am yet to find a program that can handle Office documents with 100% accuracy, or even 75% accuracy. I have tried them all, WP, StarOffice, Applix, Abi Word.
I write Linux articles for two technical newspapers in Hawaii using StarOffice on Linux. I save them in Word 6 format, and my editors have NEVER once mentioned any problems with the format or the text. I've collaborated with others who used Word 97, and I've been fully functional with StarOffice. Accuracy was not a problem, and this was 18 months ago.
Linux installation: I believe that today, with some distributions, the installation of Linux is almost as easy as a Windows installation. The difference is, that when you buy a computer today, %99.99 of them come pre installed with Windows, not Linux. The users don't have to install anything, which makes Linux by definition harder to install.
Installing Linux is much easier than Windows. I've installed each several dozen times. Installing Linux is about as difficult as installing NT. But you compare apples to oranges. Sit a user in front of a Linux box and a Windows box and ask them which is harder to install? Will they know? No. Give a person a computer with a blank hard drive and a CD-ROM, the Windows 95 disks and a Linux CD, and I'll put money on Linux. Why? Because Windows 95 CD is not bootable, and Microsoft forgot to put the CD-ROM drivers on the floppy. Most Linux CD's are bootable.
Instead of crying for Mr. Dyroff's head, we should all thank him for being sincere. We are getting enough lies from Microsoft, we don't need to hear them from the makers of our favorite distribution. By opening our eyes to the weaknesses in Linux, the truth allows us to improve the operating system.
There is a way of being sincere without demoralizing your loyal clientelle and your employees, and this was not it. The leader of any group should show full support for the group and what the group is doing. How many wars were won when the Generals said "We shouldn't be here." Not too many, because like snow, bad morale avalanches as it falls, and these type of comments can seriously demoralize a company, which adversely affects product value and performance. Enough. George -------------------------------------------------------- I don't know how anyone can say that Linux is at this moment ready for the desktop. Those that do have been working in Linux too long and have lost touch with the real world. I Manage a Computer Book Store which is a strong supporter of Linux, and I run SuSE on a dual boot machine. But I deal with regular computer users very day and their level of computer competence is just not up to the learning curve of Linux. When you see people come in day after day asking of Dummies books on this topic or that, not because they like the "Dummies" book style, but their own perceived level of competence is such that they feel only a book which tells them they are Dummies will do. I consider myself fairly tech friendly guy, but in the 6 months I've been using SuSE (part-time) I have been unable to get my printer (Epson Stylus Photo 750) working. Now this problem of working with a peripheral such as the printer is endemic of much of Linux. Until these sorts of problems are fixed Linux will not be ready for those users of "Dummies". Lastly, I do believe that Linux will be a Desktop alternative and that time is not that far away. bruce -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.0.2ckt http://irfaiad.virtualave.net/ Comment: KeyID: 0xB12E9D9B Comment: Fingerprint: B8E1 C9C8 EB7E 8E49 A15C 1E4D AEC4 5440 iQQVAwUBOMLmSA7fnvOxLp2bAQGD2x/+MD29+T0QKmHrdjhs5LH99TyOTcx3TP9N NEa5LPeaT7/gDwRtDVz8NOPSalnZx7zAliq4fiXxCJiwk/y7noQH453W/C1H+wU7 UZLP3ZY1osDuBKZ62SQOo6gkbLrOV9Ps8qiuNgb9/4cYrpe86S1+cgpn4WIaM6DE VTM3rLniTmuaxicwedWgvqUoS+9BP5On/0Y9TYNzga2qsCcl5CtK2mi0U7F5+oxI lBjaY5dwT4qAvNe4zs6DPHJW8RLg+hkxyLq7EdYVh0DGEoebeTxo/wyuAA+UAdzz /DOuHgD53IXKwhO3O5KmoL5eQ8mP2TBHhQBtslRGgfFeuwqbRDWASpEKYUmJKLYY ku/+hjQSbuhq+DpCVpKIi6APGsWL7UqjOtaSNcPPQoVu4k7dHxWTW8rukyyzS1Yw zeJMNfRiO0Sh01z8Go6Qk7VpWTnXOvc8EQmYHi+N9DqqHLLgvUTKPUJvoCyugTdf 2P5M4gRQEM2i0164zDBEMDXXd8zSvHIdFHgxsXsRw1ODQliW385eCdAK3I53ZmTr X6ixUci3Ir9OOePZBvwUkT42lJgpt3ohhw7CvPkl6khgXC2kdj6HNnItKtrw6Ulk W2XCaFsj5VAPA2Qnv/5men/mwy4c6fwdkjqUtNGrhs7s4TI0PmqLaDFsYIOzFALb fPQdXl+Nw8pY/Fbjr+ZiPSkj1FMaP+NqqoxuKxf5RZHZsAodajtYv1sZOLNge/83 zHwCMCKxRAvC6UDV5GKWDPASRt9TpnOkMOLZVs4bgezPoJertKpBvwfgZlmhHgQ3 vu3apqVPTac1l+C1R6YNH/b+qK3U8+BcU5SVmfRMQgxHXreQesARUCu4/Mv4sT0T DHhGBTvyJe/G7t5a3ZY1Xb7kVy1EeZgmCHd09tP9QE1sgdH3x8BCLq4zV55pun7R /4JHfSksRDK9JzCiFEm9Xd+wj3n8QWnjzGFZSdR6228jCxflNpOTqflzWwigksrS h+QyHiVwMdiEtPRWm1x0/dOgYfyUOtkWQxqUenx/c2jfiDOxPjv4CROUutVj5H+V 6GtHrmSBFdSYqff2NaMat3NJXYGzXMOpK/mLIjNHC2SW8tbsp6R1A7Oyd8cN9a/E 2GZiGW7rZQEuIb8Ula7JBOrNA3UG9BGkcCt3KQJKtCSYdq9c2eBPSton+t03vTvL zlimj4WL0ej6tOJDdl+ryTOX7dorR1IJAlotA0nyipc0zBHikuQxq9Sl3sbrCxYQ DF3o5SfxcLHr9LenHXEC9Al2iWy3b8soDM3CG0+kthqXTVCRA61Y1K8tj1m7WXLn HZTTLWear68r7uyhSpA0fFeNgnztzrW6D342Zwk56x0quBf0G+/UPQ== =iCrb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Hi, Hi, <font size=3>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 03:00 AM 05/03/00 -1000, you wrote: Hi, Avi, Avi Schwartz wrote:
I don't understand what the noise is all about. Roland Dyroff
about every point he brought up. I love Linux and I use it as my main platform both at home and at work but I have to agree that Linux is not quite ready for the desktop. It is coming close, but it is not
yet. That depends on whose desktop you are referring to. Most corporations have an IT department to configure software and hardware for the users. If a company deploys Linux, they should hire Linux administrators. Likewise, if they deploy NT on the desktop, they usually hire MCP's or MCSE's. What Linux is not ready for is the so-called "power user" who downloads some gee-whiz GUITweeker from download.com, changes to look of his screen and thinks he's a Guru. This individual will try to install Linux and destroy everything (because he knows all about computers and therefore does not need to read anything), and blames Linux for corrupting his data when the readme clearly said to run scandisk and defrag first. My wife doesn't give two hoots about the OS. She can use Linux
For example, to be ready for the desktop it must have, among other things, the ability to handle MS Office documents (Word, Excel, etc.) with 100% accuracy. Whether we like it or not, that is what 95% of With this criteria, Microsoft Word is not ready for the desktop. Have you ever taken a Word 6 file and loaded it into Word 97? Only if it is a simple one-page memo do I get 100% accuracy. I have fewer
is right there like a pro because the GUI is similar to Windows and StarOffice works just like MS Office. It prints when she clicks on the printer icon. (The virtual desktops still confuses her, though.) problems with a StarOffice generated document saved as Word - here I only have to replace the smiley-face bullets with real bullets and it's good to go.
businesses are using today, and that it what people use at home, since they need to ability to exchange documents between work and home. I am yet to find a program that can handle Office documents with 100% accuracy, or even 75% accuracy. I have tried them all, WP, StarOffice, Applix, Abi Word. I write Linux articles for two technical newspapers in Hawaii using StarOffice on Linux. I save them in Word 6 format, and my editors have NEVER once mentioned any problems with the format or the text. I've
collaborated with others who used Word 97, and I've been fully functional with StarOffice. Accuracy was not a problem, and this was 18 months ago. > Linux installation: I believe that today, with some distributions, the > installation of Linux is almost as easy as a Windows installation. The > difference is, that when you buy a computer today, %99.99 of them come > pre installed with Windows, not Linux. The users don't have to install > anything, which makes Linux by definition harder to install. Installing Linux is much easier than Windows. I've installed each several dozen times. Installing Linux is about as difficult as installing NT. But you compare apples to oranges. Sit a user in front of a Linux box and a Windows box and ask them which is harder to install? Will they know? No. Give a person a computer with a blank hard drive and a CD-ROM, the Windows 95 disks and a Linux CD, and I'll put money on Linux. Why? Because Windows 95 CD is not bootable, and Microsoft forgot to put the CD-ROM drivers on the floppy. Most Linux CD's are bootable. > Instead of crying for Mr. Dyroff's head, we should all thank him for > being sincere. We are getting enough lies from Microsoft, we don't need > to hear them from the makers of our favorite distribution. By opening > our eyes to the weaknesses in Linux, the truth allows us to improve the > operating system. There is a way of being sincere without demoralizing your loyal clientelle and your employees, and this was not it. The leader of any group should show full support for the group and what the group is doing. How many wars were won when the Generals said "We shouldn't be here." Not too many, because like snow, bad morale avalanches as it falls, and these type of comments can seriously demoralize a company, which adversely affects product value and performance. Enough. George -------------------------------------------------------- I don't know how anyone can say that Linux is at this moment ready for the desktop. Those that do have been working in Linux too long and have lost touch with the real world. I Manage a Computer Book Store which is a strong supporter of Linux, and I run SuSE on a dual boot machine. But I deal with regular computer users very day and their level of computer competence is just not up to the learning curve of Linux. When you see people come in day after day asking of Dummies books on this topic or that, not because they like the "Dummies" book style, but their own perceived level of competence is such that they feel only a book which tells them they are Dummies will do. I consider myself fairly tech friendly guy, but in the 6 months I've been using SuSE (part-time) I have been unable to get my printer (Epson Stylus Photo 750) working. Now this problem of working with a peripheral such as the printer is endemic of much of Linux. Until these sorts of problems are fixed Linux will not be ready for those users of "Dummies". Lastly, I do believe that Linux will be a Desktop alternative and that time is not that far away. bruce -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.0.2ckt http://irfaiad.virtualave.net/ Comment: KeyID: 0xB12E9D9B Comment: Fingerprint: B8E1 C9C8 EB7E 8E49 A15C 1E4D AEC4 5440 iQQVAwUBOMLmSA7fnvOxLp2bAQGD2x/+MD29+T0QKmHrdjhs5LH99TyOTcx3TP9N NEa5LPeaT7/gDwRtDVz8NOPSalnZx7zAliq4fiXxCJiwk/y7noQH453W/C1H+wU7 UZLP3ZY1osDuBKZ62SQOo6gkbLrOV9Ps8qiuNgb9/4cYrpe86S1+cgpn4WIaM6DE VTM3rLniTmuaxicwedWgvqUoS+9BP5On/0Y9TYNzga2qsCcl5CtK2mi0U7F5+oxI lBjaY5dwT4qAvNe4zs6DPHJW8RLg+hkxyLq7EdYVh0DGEoebeTxo/wyuAA+UAdzz /DOuHgD53IXKwhO3O5KmoL5eQ8mP2TBHhQBtslRGgfFeuwqbRDWASpEKYUmJKLYY ku/+hjQSbuhq+DpCVpKIi6APGsWL7UqjOtaSNcPPQoVu4k7dHxWTW8rukyyzS1Yw zeJMNfRiO0Sh01z8Go6Qk7VpWTnXOvc8EQmYHi+N9DqqHLLgvUTKPUJvoCyugTdf 2P5M4gRQEM2i0164zDBEMDXXd8zSvHIdFHgxsXsRw1ODQliW385eCdAK3I53ZmTr X6ixUci3Ir9OOePZBvwUkT42lJgpt3ohhw7CvPkl6khgXC2kdj6HNnItKtrw6Ulk W2XCaFsj5VAPA2Qnv/5men/mwy4c6fwdkjqUtNGrhs7s4TI0PmqLaDFsYIOzFALb fPQdXl+Nw8pY/Fbjr+ZiPSkj1FMaP+NqqoxuKxf5RZHZsAodajtYv1sZOLNge/83 zHwCMCKxRAvC6UDV5GKWDPASRt9TpnOkMOLZVs4bgezPoJertKpBvwfgZlmhHgQ3 vu3apqVPTac1l+C1R6YNH/b+qK3U8+BcU5SVmfRMQgxHXreQesARUCu4/Mv4sT0T DHhGBTvyJe/G7t5a3ZY1Xb7kVy1EeZgmCHd09tP9QE1sgdH3x8BCLq4zV55pun7R /4JHfSksRDK9JzCiFEm9Xd+wj3n8QWnjzGFZSdR6228jCxflNpOTqflzWwigksrS h+QyHiVwMdiEtPRWm1x0/dOgYfyUOtkWQxqUenx/c2jfiDOxPjv4CROUutVj5H+V 6GtHrmSBFdSYqff2NaMat3NJXYGzXMOpK/mLIjNHC2SW8tbsp6R1A7Oyd8cN9a/E 2GZiGW7rZQEuIb8Ula7JBOrNA3UG9BGkcCt3KQJKtCSYdq9c2eBPSton+t03vTvL zlimj4WL0ej6tOJDdl+ryTOX7dorR1IJAlotA0nyipc0zBHikuQxq9Sl3sbrCxYQ DF3o5SfxcLHr9LenHXEC9Al2iWy3b8soDM3CG0+kthqXTVCRA61Y1K8tj1m7WXLn HZTTLWear68r7uyhSpA0fFeNgnztzrW6D342Zwk56x0quBf0G+/UPQ== =iCrb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Hi, Hi, </font>
In article <4.2.2.20000306193019.00a48f00@mailbox.uottawa.ca>, bsh
That depends on whose desktop you are referring to. Most corporations have an IT department to configure software and hardware for the users.
That's not true. Most IT staff are employed by corporations that have an IT department, but that's not saying the same thing. Most companies are too small to have a separate IT department. So for Linux to be adopted as a desktop system in most companies it has to be able to be used by someone with no formal training in IT. They should be able to get the OS installed by reading the instructions in the manual, which should be no more than 100 pages. Installation on any standard PC system should normally take no more than an hour. After that time the system should be able to dial an ISP, print a letter and play a mean game of solitaire.
If a company deploys Linux, they should hire Linux administrators. Likewise, if they deploy NT on the desktop, they usually hire MCP's or MCSE's.
Nope. Often they get the bosses' 14-year old son to put the computer together and install the software.
What Linux is not ready for is the so-called "power user" who downloads some gee-whiz GUITweeker from download.com, changes to look of his screen and thinks he's a Guru. This individual will try to install Linux and destroy everything (because he knows all about computers and therefore does not need to read anything), and blames Linux for corrupting his data when the readme clearly said to run scandisk and defrag first.
If running scandisk and defrag is a requirement then the install program should do that and shouldn't continue until that's been done. It's acceptable for the program to offer the user the opportunity to skip those steps if they have already done them manually. The installer should still check the disk and refuse to go ahead if it is fragmented. Expecting everyone to read all of the manual is unreasonable if the manual is more than about six pages long.
With this criteria, Microsoft Word is not ready for the desktop. Have you ever taken a Word 6 file and loaded it into Word 97?
Yes. Never had a problem with it. Until recently I kept a lot of documents in Word 6 format, for compatibility with users on 16-bit systems. It's completely transparent whether the document is in Word 6 or 2000 format. Now I don't know, and don't care, which documents are in which format. I've used the latest SuSE and Caldera releases, and Red Hat distros back to 5.1. I've seen Linux evolving very rapidly. As a desktop system it's currently at about the same level as Windows was between Windows 386 and Windows 3. It's possible to tell that this system is going to be useful, but it's still got too many rough edges. Printing and the clipboard are the ones that come to mind. If the current rate of progress keeps up, Linux will be ready for the average users' desktop in two or three years. -- Bernard Peek bap@shrdlu.com bap@shrdlu.co.uk -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hi Bernard, I see we fundamentally disagree. I think this is due to different interpretations of "desktop." Let me clarify my definition and my viewpoint, and let's see if your comments still apply. In my comments, desktop means end-user computer in the corporate world. This is different than home user operating system. In the corporate world, end-users do not install operating systems. Secretaries do not install OS. I work three jobs, for companies ranging in a staff of 14 up to a staff of 600,000. In none of these do end-users install the OS. The girl that answers the phone doesn't install applications nor operating systems. Even I, as the network admin in the 600,000 employee company do not install anything on the NT machines because they have someone else in charge of it. In this regard, since each company I work for has at least one person dedicated to IT, Linux is ready. Here's a great example: My wife used Unix at AT&T on her desktop, and she used it well. She has used my Linux dosktop at home, and does it well. There's no way she could ever install a package, much less install the either Unix not Linux. She can install programs on Win95, and with 10 minutes of training, she could download and install packages unter Linux, but she cannot install the OS. See the difference? Using this example, even Win95 is not ready for the desktop either, yet there it is. Linux IS NOT ready for the average home user. It is ready for most of the people that are on this list, but the fundamental differences between that dumbed-down, crippled OS from Microsoft and the very powerful OS that we all know and love are too overwhelming for the home user to quickly master, especially in a six page installation manual. I think the only way Linux will work in the home, is either in an imbedded device (GO SONY!) or in a dumbed-down, crippled version. There is a difference between corporate desktops, mom & pop desktops, and home desktops. Linux is ready to take over anything NT does now. Bernard Peek wrote:
In article <4.2.2.20000306193019.00a48f00@mailbox.uottawa.ca>, bsh
writes That depends on whose desktop you are referring to. Most corporations have an IT department to configure software and hardware for the users.
That's not true.
Most IT staff are employed by corporations that have an IT department, but that's not saying the same thing. Most companies are too small to have a separate IT department. So for Linux to be adopted as a desktop system in most companies it has to be able to be used by someone with no formal training in IT. They should be able to get the OS installed by reading the instructions in the manual, which should be no more than 100 pages. Installation on any standard PC system should normally take no more than an hour. After that time the system should be able to dial an ISP, print a letter and play a mean game of solitaire.
If a company deploys Linux, they should hire Linux administrators. Likewise, if they deploy NT on the desktop, they usually hire MCP's or MCSE's.
Nope. Often they get the bosses' 14-year old son to put the computer together and install the software.
What Linux is not ready for is the so-called "power user" who downloads some gee-whiz GUITweeker from download.com, changes to look of his screen and thinks he's a Guru. This individual will try to install Linux and destroy everything (because he knows all about computers and therefore does not need to read anything), and blames Linux for corrupting his data when the readme clearly said to run scandisk and defrag first.
If running scandisk and defrag is a requirement then the install program should do that and shouldn't continue until that's been done. It's acceptable for the program to offer the user the opportunity to skip those steps if they have already done them manually. The installer should still check the disk and refuse to go ahead if it is fragmented.
Expecting everyone to read all of the manual is unreasonable if the manual is more than about six pages long.
With this criteria, Microsoft Word is not ready for the desktop. Have you ever taken a Word 6 file and loaded it into Word 97?
Yes. Never had a problem with it. Until recently I kept a lot of documents in Word 6 format, for compatibility with users on 16-bit systems. It's completely transparent whether the document is in Word 6 or 2000 format. Now I don't know, and don't care, which documents are in which format.
I've used the latest SuSE and Caldera releases, and Red Hat distros back to 5.1. I've seen Linux evolving very rapidly. As a desktop system it's currently at about the same level as Windows was between Windows 386 and Windows 3. It's possible to tell that this system is going to be useful, but it's still got too many rough edges. Printing and the clipboard are the ones that come to mind.
If the current rate of progress keeps up, Linux will be ready for the average users' desktop in two or three years.
-- Bernard Peek bap@shrdlu.com bap@shrdlu.co.uk
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
-- George Toft http://www.georgetoft.com -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
George Toft wrote:
Linux IS NOT ready for the average home user. It is ready for most of the people that are on this list, but the fundamental differences between that dumbed-down, crippled OS from Microsoft and the very powerful OS that we all know and love are too overwhelming for the home user to quickly master, especially in a six page installation manual. I think the only way Linux will work in the home, is either in an imbedded device (GO SONY!) or in a dumbed-down, crippled version.
You make your points well and eloquently, George, but your last sentence makes the alternative sound worse than I think it is. Dumbed-down and crippled aren't entirely the same thing, for instance. Also, the connotation is that any such version would be a monstrosity. To the contrary, it might even turn out to be a more reliable, non-Microsoft-controlled, better-designed, but nevertheless Windows-like system. And why couldn't it have a side door that provides access to the full underlying system? Paul Abrahams -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hi Paul! Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
George Toft wrote:
Linux IS NOT ready for the average home user. It is ready for most of the people that are on this list, but the fundamental differences between that dumbed-down, crippled OS from Microsoft and the very powerful OS that we all know and love are too overwhelming for the home user to quickly master, especially in a six page installation manual. I think the only way Linux will work in the home, is either in an imbedded device (GO SONY!) or in a dumbed-down, crippled version.
You make your points well and eloquently, George, but your last sentence makes the alternative sound worse than I think it is. Dumbed-down and crippled aren't entirely the same thing, for instance.
Dumbed-down and crippled has its place. The Linux Router Project (LRP) is one example. I use it and have set it up for four people. It's almost like an embedded system. Simple, easy to use - if you understand networking. LRP is very difficult to use when you are used to a full Linux system. But being cripple is its strength - since it does so little, and everything it does has been reviewd for absolute necessity, the whole distro fits on a single floppy disk.
Also, the connotation is that any such version would be a monstrosity. To the contrary, it might even turn out to be a more reliable, non-Microsoft-controlled, better-designed, but nevertheless Windows-like system.
Well, Paul, I thought about your point for several minutes. You are right. And I'm sure it will come to be - in the future (even in the near future). But I don't think we are there, yet. On the other side of the coin, in my Beginning Linux class that I teach for a local computer vendor, I watched a Linux newbie install SuSE 6.3 without any help. The only Linux experience she had up to that point was the previous seven hours of instruction I had given her and her classmates, which included a text-based install. Good Job, SuSE! (Ok, I confess, I had to translate the opening German screen for her. For some strange reason, German is not a very popular language in Hawaii.)
And why couldn't it have a side door that provides access to the full underlying system?
Maybe this is where TurboLinux is going with their Workstation and Server versions? Thanks for the well thought-out counter point. -- George Toft http://www.georgetoft.com -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
George Toft said:
Here's a great example: My wife used Unix at AT&T on her desktop, and she used it well. She has used my Linux dosktop at home, and does it well. There's no way she could ever install a package, much less install the either Unix not Linux. She can install programs on Win95, and with 10 minutes of training, she could download and install packages unter Linux, but she cannot install the OS. See the difference? Using this example, even Win95 is not ready for the desktop either, yet there it is.
Linux IS NOT ready for the average home user. It is ready for most of the people that are on this list, but the fundamental differences between that dumbed-down, crippled OS from Microsoft and the very powerful OS that we all know and love are too overwhelming for the home user to quickly master, especially in a six page installation manual. I think the only way Linux will work in the home, is either in an imbedded device (GO SONY!) or in a dumbed-down, crippled version.
Perhaps there is a third alternative.. turn the computer into an appliance and have repair/service people like we have for other appliances. Sure you'll always have the do-it-yourselfer that screws things up, but that doesn't seem any different than what plumbers and electricians, or IT people at the office, are dealing with today. Thing is, the OS has to be as reliable as your average air-conditioner (or electrical wiring or plumbing) is to make the economics work out and Windows won't cut it here. With a little maneuvering though I think something like one of the BSDs or Linux could work in such a scenario, especially if a lot of the administration could be done over the 'net, eliminating some of the time-consuming house calls. If it wasn't for the fact that today I'd have to deal mostly with braindead Win boxes I might already have started such a service (well, that and the fact that I already have two jobs). I know I'd have the clients, I do most of the work on the computers of friends and family already. I even get the occasional referral. :) -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Bernard Peek wrote:
In article <4.2.2.20000306193019.00a48f00@mailbox.uottawa.ca>, bsh
writes That depends on whose desktop you are referring to. Most corporations have an IT department to configure software and hardware for the users.
That's not true.
Most IT staff are employed by corporations that have an IT department, but that's not saying the same thing. Most companies are too small to have a separate IT department. So for Linux to be adopted as a desktop system in most companies it has to be able to be used by someone with no formal training in IT. They should be able to get the OS installed by reading the instructions in the manual, which should be no more than 100 pages. Installation on any standard PC system should normally take no more than an hour.
After repeated lockups and crashes on my workstation running Win95 I decided to reinstall. I scrubbed the C drive and put Win95 on fresh. The IT folks came by and installed Lotus Notes and the network copies of Corel WP and Quatropro and installed the Internet proxy. Total time: about 1.5 hours. The next day an IT person dropped off my new HP CD-Writer. It required Win98 so I had to scrub C againt and install Win98 SE. One hour later it was on. I can't count the number of reboots required during the process. Well, 5 minutes after completing the install and preparing to install Notes, Corel and the proxy, while using Explorer (fm) I got a BSOD! Bad sign! Five hours later the IT folks (very sharp I might add) still were not able to get Notes going because M$'s 'Messaging system' was interfering with the Corel installation. They have yet to find a way to remove the Messaging system. Probably part of M$'s anti-competitive artifically created incompatibilities practice I suspect. It's not like they haven't done that in the past... duh.
After that time the system should be able to dial an ISP, print a letter and play a mean game of solitaire.
Using the workstation to play games is not allowed in my office.
<snip>
If the current rate of progress keeps up, Linux will be ready for the average users' desktop in two or three years.
Maybe one or perhaps two years at the most. For many people, like myself, it is ready now! If Linux, running KDE for example, will do all that you need to do then it is ready. The advantages are that Linux doesn't crash and most of the apps are free or very inexpensive. Not only that, there are fine commerical apps being released almost on a daily basis.
-- Bernard Peek bap@shrdlu.com bap@shrdlu.co.uk
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
As long as Linux has that horrible BSD printing (works like microsoft) system, it's not ready for any desktop. Rusty Jerry L Kreps wrote:
Bernard Peek wrote:
In article <4.2.2.20000306193019.00a48f00@mailbox.uottawa.ca>, bsh
writes That depends on whose desktop you are referring to. Most corporations have an IT department to configure software and hardware for the users.
That's not true.
Most IT staff are employed by corporations that have an IT department, but that's not saying the same thing. Most companies are too small to have a separate IT department. So for Linux to be adopted as a desktop system in most companies it has to be able to be used by someone with no formal training in IT. They should be able to get the OS installed by reading the instructions in the manual, which should be no more than 100 pages. Installation on any standard PC system should normally take no more than an hour.
After repeated lockups and crashes on my workstation running Win95 I decided to reinstall. I scrubbed the C drive and put Win95 on fresh. The IT folks came by and installed Lotus Notes and the network copies of Corel WP and Quatropro and installed the Internet proxy. Total time: about 1.5 hours.
The next day an IT person dropped off my new HP CD-Writer. It required Win98 so I had to scrub C againt and install Win98 SE. One hour later it was on. I can't count the number of reboots required during the process. Well, 5 minutes after completing the install and preparing to install Notes, Corel and the proxy, while using Explorer (fm) I got a BSOD! Bad sign! Five hours later the IT folks (very sharp I might add) still were not able to get Notes going because M$'s 'Messaging system' was interfering with the Corel installation. They have yet to find a way to remove the Messaging system. Probably part of M$'s anti-competitive artifically created incompatibilities practice I suspect. It's not like they haven't done that in the past... duh.
After that time the system should be able to dial an ISP, print a letter and play a mean game of solitaire.
Using the workstation to play games is not allowed in my office.
<snip>
If the current rate of progress keeps up, Linux will be ready for the average users' desktop in two or three years.
Maybe one or perhaps two years at the most. For many people, like myself, it is ready now! If Linux, running KDE for example, will do all that you need to do then it is ready. The advantages are that Linux doesn't crash and most of the apps are free or very inexpensive. Not only that, there are fine commerical apps being released almost on a daily basis.
-- Bernard Peek bap@shrdlu.com bap@shrdlu.co.uk
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Rusty wrote:
As long as Linux has that horrible BSD printing (works like microsoft) system, it's not ready for any desktop.
Rusty
What 'horrible BSD printing'? I print to a BJC-620 without any problems what soever. From Netscape URL printouts to Star Office, WP8, KDE apps, Adobe 4.0 pdf's, postscript, text, star maps, ... you name it. Zero problems. Zilch, nada, none.... Use YaST to set up .... right out of SuSE 6.3 box. Here's a cut&paste of the relevant stuff from /etc/printcap... ### BEGIN apsfilter: ### bjc600 letter color 360 ### # Warning: Configured for apsfilter, do not edit the labels! # apsfilter setup Sun Oct 10 13:17:26 CDT 1999 # ascii|lp1|bjc600-letter-ascii-mono-360|bjc600 letter ascii mono 360:\ :lp=/dev/lp0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-ascii-mono-360:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-ascii-mono-360/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-ascii-mono-360/acct:\ :if=/var/lib/apsfilter/bin/bjc600-letter-ascii-mono-360:\ :la@:mx#0:\ :tr=:cl:sh:sf: # lp|lp2|bjc600-letter-auto-color-360|bjc600 letter auto color 360:\ :lp=/dev/lp0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-auto-color-360:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-auto-color-360/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-auto-color-360/acct:\ :if=/var/lib/apsfilter/bin/bjc600-letter-auto-color-360:\ :la@:mx#0:\ :tr=:cl:sh:sf: # lp-mono|lp3|bjc600-letter-auto-mono-360|bjc600 letter auto mono 360:\ :lp=/dev/lp0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-auto-mono-360:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-auto-mono-360/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-auto-mono-360/acct:\ :if=/var/lib/apsfilter/bin/bjc600-letter-auto-mono-360:\ :la@:mx#0:\ :tr=:cl:sh:sf: # raw|lp4|bjc600-letter-raw|bjc600 letter raw:\ :lp=/dev/lp0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-raw:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-raw/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/bjc600-letter-raw/acct:\ :if=/var/lib/apsfilter/bin/bjc600-letter-raw:\ :la@:mx#0:\ :tr=:cl:sh:sf: # ### END apsfilter: ### bjc600 letter color 360 ### JLK -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
On 12-Mar-00 Jerry L Kreps wrote:
Bernard Peek wrote:
In article <4.2.2.20000306193019.00a48f00@mailbox.uottawa.ca>, bsh
writes That depends on whose desktop you are referring to. Most corporations have an IT department to configure software and hardware for the users.
That's not true.
Most IT staff are employed by corporations that have an IT department, but that's not saying the same thing. Most companies are too small to have a separate IT department. So for Linux to be adopted as a desktop system in most companies it has to be able to be used by someone with no formal training in IT. They should be able to get the OS installed by reading the instructions in the manual, which should be no more than 100 pages. Installation on any standard PC system should normally take no more than an hour.
After repeated lockups and crashes on my workstation running Win95 I decided to reinstall. I scrubbed the C drive and put Win95 on fresh. The IT folks came by and installed Lotus Notes and the network copies of Corel WP and Quatropro and installed the Internet proxy. Total time: about 1.5 hours.
The next day an IT person dropped off my new HP CD-Writer. It required Win98 so I had to scrub C againt and install Win98 SE. One hour later it was on. I can't count the number of reboots required during the process. Well, 5 minutes after completing the install and preparing to install Notes, Corel and the proxy, while using Explorer (fm) I got a BSOD! Bad sign! Five hours later the IT folks (very sharp I might add) still were not able to get Notes going because M$'s 'Messaging system' was interfering with the Corel installation. They have yet to find a way to remove the Messaging system. Probably part of M$'s anti-competitive artifically created incompatibilities practice I suspect. It's not like they haven't done that in the past... duh.
After that time the system should be able to dial an ISP, print a letter and play a mean game of solitaire.
Using the workstation to play games is not allowed in my office.
<snip>
If the current rate of progress keeps up, Linux will be ready for the average users' desktop in two or three years.
Maybe one or perhaps two years at the most. For many people, like myself, it is ready now! If Linux, running KDE for example, will do all that you need to do then it is ready. The advantages are that Linux doesn't crash and most of the apps are free or very inexpensive. Not only that, there are fine commerical apps being released almost on a daily basis.
-- Bernard Peek bap@shrdlu.com bap@shrdlu.co.uk
Thought I'd add my two cents to this thread I've been reading for awhile. I
believe Linux is ready for the desktop right now, IF you are the typical home
user running a computer for word processing and the Internet. Mind you, then
the real power of Linux, with the exception of its stability goes essentially
unnoticed. On the other hand, there is the essential immunity to viruses in
Linux.
Anyway, if you then require additional programs, say for instance a
card/greeting program like Printshop or PrintMasterGold, or perhaps any of an
assortment of other programs not available on Linux then you'll need more than
Linux, as in Windows right now.
I've survived on Linux w/ WINE, and an occasional boot to OS/2 w/ DOS/Win3.1
support enabled for the last two years (four years if you included just the
latter combo as my previous OS)...Until this weekend...I needed some
Win95/98-ONLY apps. So I blew away DOS/Win3.1, disabled OS/2-WIN support,
shrunk my hardly ever used OS/2 partition, and installed Win98. Now I have 98,
OS/2, and SuSE Linux, with room to try a couple other Linux distributions soon
as well.
In short and to reiterate, Linux is ready for the generic typical user now.
But the extra apps that many might need aren't there yet. What it will take is
that other year or two, for companies to port their apps to Linux, or when they
bring out an app, support Linux right from the start.
-----------------------------------
Arlen Carlson
participants (8)
-
abrahams@valinet.com
-
adcarlso@visinet.ca
-
bernard@shrdlu.com
-
dk983@freenet.carleton.ca
-
grtoft@yahoo.com
-
irisinc@gci.net
-
JerryKreps@alltel.net
-
jmgrant@primenet.com