VoIP compatible software to Net2phone or similar
I am looking for a VoIP software, which can work with Net2phone. I know Net2phone is not the best software, but it has worldwide gateways!!!! bye Ronald
Can you say "google" :-) ?
See http://www.google.com/linux?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=VoIP&btnG=Google+Search
for a start.
I don't think there is anything out for Linux to utilize Net2Phone.
Ronald Wiplinger
I am looking for a VoIP software, which can work with Net2phone.
I know Net2phone is not the best software, but it has worldwide gateways!!!!
bye
Ronald
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Hi, I was wondering if anyone could advise me? I have a web server live on the internet, which has two internet live network cards, on different IP addresses. Lets say, eth0 has the IP : 213.254.182.144/24 and eth1 has the IP : 193.128.89.158/24 Both are internet reachable. I would like to define some routing rules such that any traffic that originated through eth0, is sent back out via eth0, and likewise, traffic that came through eth1 goes out via eth1. I was thinking of something like : route add default gw 213.254.182.145 eth0 and route add default gw 193.128.89.157 eth1 where 213.254.182.145 and 193.128.89.157 are both routers. Would this work? I've not tried it yet and so this is all theory so far. Thanks in advance, Paul Please note, I completely made up the IP addresses!
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:55:26PM -0700, Paul Miles wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could advise me? I have a web server live on the internet, which has two internet live network cards, on different IP addresses.
Lets say, eth0 has the IP : 213.254.182.144/24 and eth1 has the IP : 193.128.89.158/24
Both are internet reachable.
I would like to define some routing rules such that any traffic that originated through eth0, is sent back out via eth0, and likewise, traffic that came through eth1 goes out via eth1.
I was thinking of something like :
route add default gw 213.254.182.145 eth0 and route add default gw 193.128.89.157 eth1
where 213.254.182.145 and 193.128.89.157 are both routers.
Would this work? I've not tried it yet and so this is all theory so far.
Your system should send replies automatically to the nearest known route back to the computer that sent the request, which in most cases will be router that passed on the request and the card that received the request, unless there is a route statement that overrides it. You can only have one "default" gateway, which is where packets go when there is no other known route. Routes are defined by destination, not be where the request came from. So, if you always want to reply to particular networks through a particular router, you can do that with route statements. You system will add to the routes you define dynamically based on other networks and hosts it learns about while it is running. Hope this helps. Best Regards, Keith -- LPIC-2, MCSE, N+ Right behind you, I see the millions Got spam? Get spastic http://spastic.sourceforge.net
* Paul Miles;
I was thinking of something like :
route add default gw 213.254.182.145 eth0 and route add default gw 193.128.89.157 eth1
where 213.254.182.145 and 193.128.89.157 are both routers.
Would this work? I've not tried it yet and so this is all theory so far.
is doable have a look at the Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control Howto and your specific part is http://lartc.org/HOWTO//cvs/2.4routing/html/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html HTH -- Togan Muftuoglu Unofficial SuSE FAQ Maintainer http://dinamizm.ath.cx
participants (5)
-
Keith Winston
-
Paul Miles
-
Ronald Wiplinger
-
Togan Muftuoglu
-
W.D. McKinney