Weird behaviour with this list
Just a heads-up. If you notice any weird behaviour with the suse-linux-e list, it's because we're changing some setups. Sorry for any inconvenience. Regards, Mads Martin Jørgensen, ml-admin@suse.com -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort." -- A. P. J.
Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
Just a heads-up. If you notice any weird behaviour with the suse-linux-e list, it's because we're changing some setups.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Regards, Mads Martin Jørgensen, ml-admin@suse.com
Ok. Please let us know as soon as it's over. By looks of it, some (important) headers have changed, both my procmail rules and netscaoe filtering do not work anymore. I do not want to repair it twice. ;-) Juergen -- =========================================== __ _ Juergen Braukmann juergen.braukmann@gmx.de| -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Tel: 0201-743648 dk4jb@db0qs.#nrw.deu.eu | /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / ===========================================_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
Just a heads-up. If you notice any weird behaviour with the suse-linux-e list, it's because we're changing some setups.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Regards, Mads Martin Jørgensen, ml-admin@suse.com
Ok. Please let us know as soon as it's over. By looks of it, some (important) headers have changed, both my procmail rules and netscaoe filtering do not work anymore. I do not want to repair it twice. ;-) I'm wondering if these changes are the cause of the bounced messaged that im not getting, i got a ezmlm warning from this list today. But im getting
At 01:14 PM 6/3/2001 +0200, Juergen Braukmann wrote: the messages ok as far as i can tell. jack Jack Malone jack@malone.tyler.com http://www.ballistic.com/~jemalone Luke 4:18-19 "The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor." (NIV)
* Juergen Braukmann
Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
Just a heads-up. If you notice any weird behaviour with the suse-linux-e list, it's because we're changing some setups.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Regards, Mads Martin Jørgensen, ml-admin@suse.com
Ok. Please let us know as soon as it's over. By looks of it, some (important) headers have changed, both my procmail rules and netscaoe filtering do not work anymore. I do not want to repair it twice. ;-)
It should be perfect now, and should not change anymore. You guys were moved to the new list-server. And in the upcoming week you'll see why it's not that bad that you went through a little hazzle with filtering. Thanks, Mads Martin -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort." -- A. P. J.
On Mon, 04 Jun 2001, Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
* Juergen Braukmann
[Jun 03. 2001 08:07]: Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
Just a heads-up. If you notice any weird behaviour with the suse-linux-e list, it's because we're changing some setups.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Regards, Mads Martin Jørgensen, ml-admin@suse.com
Ok. Please let us know as soon as it's over. By looks of it, some (important) headers have changed, both my procmail rules and netscaoe filtering do not work anymore. I do not want to repair it twice. ;-)
It should be perfect now, and should not change anymore. You guys were moved to the new list-server.
And in the upcoming week you'll see why it's not that bad that you went through a little hazzle with filtering.
Thanks, Mads Martin -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort." -- A. P. J.
I thought something was happining strange when mails didn't get filtered. Kmail filter is working well for me now with, <<any header>> = X-Mailinglist: move to > suse-linux-e . cheers John WM
Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
* Juergen Braukmann
[Jun 03. 2001 08:07]: Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
Just a heads-up. If you notice any weird behaviour with the suse-linux-e list, it's because we're changing some setups.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Regards, Mads Martin Jørgensen, ml-admin@suse.com
Ok. Please let us know as soon as it's over. By looks of it, some (important) headers have changed, both my procmail rules and netscaoe filtering do not work anymore. I do not want to repair it twice. ;-)
It should be perfect now, and should not change anymore. You guys were moved to the new list-server.
And in the upcoming week you'll see why it's not that bad that you went through a little hazzle with filtering.
Thanks. Everything is now back to nomal and was later yesterday. I was just frightened to find my personal folder filled up with hundrets of mails ;-)). Let's see what comes up next week. (Free iso's from 7.2 per mail??? ;-) -miracusly compressed to 1,44 MB each??-) Juergen
Thanks, Mads Martin -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort." -- A. P. J.
-- =========================================== __ _ Juergen Braukmann juergen.braukmann@gmx.de| -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Tel: 0201-743648 dk4jb@db0qs.#nrw.deu.eu | /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / ===========================================_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
On Sunday 03 June 2001 11:14, Juergen Braukmann wrote:
Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
Just a heads-up. If you notice any weird behaviour with the suse-linux-e list, it's because we're changing some setups.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Regards, Mads Martin Jørgensen, ml-admin@suse.com
And after all this time I still thought it was a list characteristic to be a little weird........ Thanks for the info! Terence
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 03:55:59AM -0700, Mads Martin J?rgensen wrote:
Just a heads-up. If you notice any weird behaviour with the suse-linux-e list, it's because we're changing some setups.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
I was just looking into that (read that message telneted into the POP3 server). ;-) The first message that broke for me happened to coincide with me changing my configuration as well so I thought it was my fault... When you've finished changing your setup, can you try and make sure that the X-Mailing-List header (or something similar) is still there? Thanks for the heads up - I could have spent the next two hours trying to figure out how my config change mucked everything up :) Chris -- __ _ -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Chris Reeves /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / ICQ# 22219005 _\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
participants (6)
-
basslake
-
Chris Reeves
-
Jack Malone
-
Juergen Braukmann
-
Mads Martin Jørgensen
-
Terence McCarthy