---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: failure notice
Date: 9 Mar 2001 08:29:27 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@lists.suse.com
To: hattons@bellatlantic.net
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at lists.suse.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
:
ezmlm-send: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header (maybe I should
be a sublist) (#5.7.2)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path:
Received: (qmail 8293 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2001 08:29:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.suse.com) (202.58.118.2)
by ns2.suse.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2001 08:29:25 -0000
Received: from mail.houston.rr.com (unknown [24.93.35.226])
by ns1.suse.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144A1DF91B
for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 00:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail pickup service by mail.houston.rr.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 02:18:23 -0600
Received: from sm3.texas.rr.com ([24.93.35.210]) by mail.houston.rr.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Tue, 6 Mar 2001 01:15:11 -0600
Received: from wormwood.pobox.com (wormwood.pobox.com [208.210.124.20])
by sm3.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2674QU16071
for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 01:04:27 -0600
Received: from wormwood.pobox.com (localhost.pobox.com [127.0.0.1])
by wormwood.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1892472515
for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 02:12:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lists.suse.com (host1.SuSE.com [202.58.118.3])
by wormwood.pobox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C77627250C
for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 02:12:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 6543 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2001 07:12:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact suse-linux-e-help@suse.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
list-help: mailto:suse-linux-e-help@lists.suse.com
list-unsubscribe: mailto:suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@lists.suse.com
list-post: mailto:suse-linux-e@suse.com
X-Mailinglist: suse-linux-e
Delivered-To: mailing list suse-linux-e@lists.suse.com
Received: (qmail 6536 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2001 07:12:32 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: "Steven T. Hatton"
Organization: Global Symmetry
To:
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 02:12:28 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <01030522531902.01342@gate>
In-Reply-To: <01030522531902.01342@gate>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0103060212280I.00755@nariana>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [SLE] When eth0 and eth1 activated?
Sender: suse-linux-e-return-49485-tnguyen=pobox.com@suse.com
On Tuesday 06 March 2001 01:53, Alex Daniloff wrote:
Hello SuSE folkz,
I was getting messages about failing firewall initialization.
Here are the lines from boot.msg file:
Master Resource Control: previous runlevel: N, switching to runlevel: 5
Starting Firewall Initialization: (phase 1 of 3) (run 2 of 3) Warning:
interface eth1 is not active.
Warning: interface eth0 is not active.
No interfaces active! exiting ...
SuSEfirewall: clearing rules now ... done
failed
Could somebody tell me please at what moment (runlevel) my ethernet cards
are being activated? Do firewall services failed due to eth0/eth1 are not
activated at this moment or there is another reason?
Thanks in advance for any hints.
Alex
Alex,
If it makes you feel better, I'm getting the same thing. I really don't
know. If I find a clue. I'll post it.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
-------------------------------------------------------