Hello, Just one incident that happened today. At work I have a Postfix e-mail servor on SuSE 7.1 that has worked without problem for two months. This morning I decided to reboot it for now forgotten reasons. After rebooting, I want to get my mail on another host and I have, with kmail, the following answer:
I said: "PASS <your password>" And then the server said: "ERR-invalid login"
Postfix did not accept my password anymore.
I spent the whole day trying to understand why.
I must say that I spent many days trying (without success) to install
Cyrus-Imap.
Finally I try a telnet:
telnet
Bartydeux wrote: ...
I don't understand because Cyrus-Imap should not interfere with POP3
cyrus also provides pop3 access to the main folder of the user (INBOX) ...
Does anybody have an answer for that problem?
SuSE EMail Server III: http://www.suse.com/us/press/press_releases/archive01/emailserver3_test.html Test it online: http://emailserver3.SuSE.de/perl/login.pl?doit=login&lang=EN MH
Quoting Michael Hasenstein
Bartydeux wrote: ...
I don't understand because Cyrus-Imap should not interfere with POP3
cyrus also provides pop3 access to the main folder of the user (INBOX)
...
Does anybody have an answer for that problem?
SuSE EMail Server III: http://www.suse.com/us/press/press_releases/archive01/emailserver3_test.html
Test it online: http://emailserver3.SuSE.de/perl/login.pl?doit=login&lang=EN
Please stop pushing Email Server III. I paid good money for Email Server II and now I am screwed. You do not have a reasonable upgrade path. There is not a reasonable support mechanism for email server II (upgrades and patches). and the software is still full of bugs. Now, Email Server III costs 3x what I paid for Email server II. With the upgrade price being the difference (2 more X what I paid). Email server II was already outdated versions of free software, the only thing of value was SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (7.0). The rest was crap. I am still running it, why? It takes a lot of effort to change a mail system that more than you use. As for my investment in Email server II? Shame on me... Greg gjohnson@frozen.com
This is one of those things I hate about email... tone is not accounted for...
I do not mean to say that SuSE Email Server III is a bad product.
I just do not want to hear that it is the answer to all of our current
problems. If it is the answer to life the universe and everything, should it
not be free? But seriously, Many of the people here are trying to help from a
more personal level and are not interested in commercial products that cost
$1000+
I saw a post looking for a lower cost version of the firewall on a cd software
that SuSE sells. I would also be interested in this. I was able to afford Email
Server II (for personal use, $300), but I can not afford Email Server III
($1000). Not all of us are businesses. Just users. Help us Help You (didn't I
see this in a movie?) Also, along the same lines, pushing SuSE Linus Enterprise
Server does not help me either. Just because I have hardware that might fall in
that category (Proliant 1850s) does not mean that I am an entrerprise.
I very much prefer SuSE Linux over all other OS choices for most of my
hardware. Let's just work with what we have rather than paying for all of the
latest versions that SuSE would like us to use.
Greg S. Johnson
gjohnson@frozen.com
P.S. Incedently, I do own every version of SuSE professional since 7.0, and I
will continue to buy them.
Quoting Greg Johnson
Quoting Michael Hasenstein
: Bartydeux wrote: ...
I don't understand because Cyrus-Imap should not interfere with POP3
cyrus also provides pop3 access to the main folder of the user (INBOX)
...
Does anybody have an answer for that problem?
SuSE EMail Server III:
http://www.suse.com/us/press/press_releases/archive01/emailserver3_test.html
Test it online: http://emailserver3.SuSE.de/perl/login.pl?doit=login&lang=EN
Please stop pushing Email Server III. I paid good money for Email Server II and now I am screwed. You do not have a reasonable upgrade path. There is not a reasonable support mechanism for email server II (upgrades and patches). and the software is still full of bugs.
Now, Email Server III costs 3x what I paid for Email server II. With the
upgrade price being the difference (2 more X what I paid). Email server II was already outdated versions of free software, the only thing of value was SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (7.0). The rest was crap. I am still running it, why? It takes a lot of effort to change a mail system that more than you use. As for my investment in Email server II? Shame on me...
Greg gjohnson@frozen.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
This is one of those things I hate about email... tone is not accounted for...
I do not mean to say that SuSE Email Server III is a bad product.
I just do not want to hear that it is the answer to all of our current problems. If it is the answer to life the universe and everything, should it not be free? But seriously, Many of the people here are trying to help from a more personal level and are not interested in commercial products that cost $1000+
I saw a post looking for a lower cost version of the firewall on a cd software that SuSE sells. I would also be interested in this. I was able to afford Email Server II (for personal use, $300), but I can not afford Email Server III ($1000). Not all of us are businesses. Just users. Help us Help You (didn't I see this in a movie?) Also, along the same lines, pushing SuSE Linus Enterprise Server does not help me either. Just because I have hardware that might fall in that category (Proliant 1850s) does not mean that I am an entrerprise.
I very much prefer SuSE Linux over all other OS choices for most of my hardware. Let's just work with what we have rather than paying for all of
If you can't afford to buy it ... don't.
All of the functionality (minus the nice configuration manager - which I
assume EmailServer has) can be created using any Linux.
If you need the configuration manager, then your a bit stuck - personally I
would recommend the system man pages, and hack the configuration files
yourself.
Kind regards,
Paul Miles
All Secure Networks
Visit www.allsecuredomain.com for low cost
web hosting and domain registration
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Johnson"
latest versions that SuSE would like us to use.
Greg S. Johnson gjohnson@frozen.com
P.S. Incedently, I do own every version of SuSE professional since 7.0, and I will continue to buy them. Quoting Greg Johnson
: Quoting Michael Hasenstein
: Bartydeux wrote: ...
I don't understand because Cyrus-Imap should not interfere with POP3
cyrus also provides pop3 access to the main folder of the user (INBOX)
...
Does anybody have an answer for that problem?
SuSE EMail Server III:
http://www.suse.com/us/press/press_releases/archive01/emailserver3_test.html
Test it online: http://emailserver3.SuSE.de/perl/login.pl?doit=login&lang=EN
Please stop pushing Email Server III. I paid good money for Email Server II and now I am screwed. You do not have a reasonable upgrade path. There is not a reasonable support mechanism for email server II (upgrades and patches). and the software is still full of bugs.
Now, Email Server III costs 3x what I paid for Email server II. With the
upgrade price being the difference (2 more X what I paid). Email server II was already outdated versions of free software, the only thing of value was SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (7.0). The rest was crap. I am still running it, why? It takes a lot of effort to change a mail system that more than you use. As for my investment in Email server II? Shame on me...
Greg gjohnson@frozen.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
[Don't worry, I'll wrap your long lines for you] * Greg Johnson (gjohnson@frozen.com) [011121 22:27]:
I saw a post looking for a lower cost version of the firewall on a cd software that SuSE sells. I would also be interested in this.
You already have it--Marc's firewall script is available for free. Oh wait, you also want it to run from a CD and have a nice GUI tool to configure it? Well, there are development costs involved. Contray to popular belief, we don't receive tens of millions of dollar in funding from the NSA for building the next-generation unmarked black heliocopters with shady Philipino characters.
I was able to afford Email Server II (for personal use, $300), but I can not afford Email Server III ($1000).
Why on earth would you buy a $300 dollar product for personal email? Apparantly you're upset that we sold it to you; I'm very sorry about that. Please feel free to ask advice....Surely you aren't considering buying the FWCD for your home DSL line?
Not all of us are businesses. Just users. Help us Help You (didn't I see this in a movie?) Also, along the same lines, pushing SuSE Linus Enterprise Server does not help me either. Just because I have hardware that might fall in that category (Proliant 1850s) does not mean that I am an entrerprise.
Who's pushing that on home users? Home users don't normally run things like Oracle or SAP so they probably don't need something that was certified for them. Did I mention that the certification process costs a lot of money?
I very much prefer SuSE Linux over all other OS choices for most of my hardware. Let's just work with what we have rather than paying for all of the latest versions that SuSE would like us to use.
I would like everyone on this list to buy 10 copies of SLES each so that I get a Christmas bonus this year. The guy who posted the original POP/postfix question apparantly doesn't know much about mail servers and didn't include any information in his post that would allow someone to help him (logs, postconf, inetd.conf or xinetd.conf...does he know which one he is running?). There's nothing wrong with that--he could be a Nobel laureate in physics for all I know--but that's who products like the email server III are aimed at.
P.S. Incedently, I do own every version of SuSE professional since 7.0, and I will continue to buy them.
Thank you. -- -ckm
On Thursday 22 November 2001 02:03, Christopher Mahmood wrote:
[Don't worry, I'll wrap your long lines for you]
* Greg Johnson (gjohnson@frozen.com) [011121 22:27]:
I saw a post looking for a lower cost version of the firewall on a cd software that SuSE sells. I would also be interested in this.
You already have it--Marc's firewall script is available for free. Oh wait, you also want it to run from a CD and have a nice GUI tool to configure it? Well, there are development costs involved. Contray to popular belief, we don't receive tens of millions of dollar in funding from the NSA for building the next-generation unmarked black heliocopters with shady Philipino characters.
ROF,L!!!!
BTW, is Raul Ocampo
I would like everyone on this list to buy 10 copies of SLES each so that I get a Christmas bonus this year. The guy who posted the original POP/postfix question apparantly doesn't know much about mail servers and didn't include any information in his post that would allow someone to help him (logs, postconf, inetd.conf or xinetd.conf...does he know which one he is running?). There's nothing wrong with that--he could be a Nobel laureate in physics for all I know--but that's who products like the email server III are aimed at.
P.S. Incedently, I do own every version of SuSE professional since 7.0, and I will continue to buy them.
Ditto!! Sometimes I buy two and give one to friends! JLK
Hello,
I would like everyone on this list to buy 10 copies of SLES each so that I get a Christmas bonus this year. The guy who posted the original POP/postfix question apparantly doesn't know much about mail servers and didn't include any information in his post that would allow someone to help him (logs, postconf, inetd.conf or xinetd.conf...does he know which one he is running?).
Yes I know something about mail server because Postfix is now running but it is not my speciality. There are people yhat know more about e-mail server than I and that's why I send my question to the list, not to launch a debate about "should I buy Email server III or not": it looks too muck like MS policy. If you want me to send you all my logs and config files, OK, just tell me which ones. I am running inetd.conf if you want to know. I did not have time yet to learn xinetd (too much time spent trying to find a manual about cyrus-imap). I solved my problem with mu inability to read my Mailbox. I just changed START_CYRUS="yes" to START_CYRUS="no" in /etc/rc.config because it was the Cyrus implementation that causes problems of password reading (which problem I don't know) even if I typed rccyrus stop. I found where the problem was after making a telnet 110. Thanks again for any good manual (I am not a Nobel laureate bur I read Perl/ipchains/Mysql/Tk/ + the rest ....) Sorry I don't have enough pocket money to buy Email server III. Not easy to convince a majority of MS or Apple users to try Linux when you are the only person to know something (even little) about servers configuration. Alain There's
nothing wrong with that--he could be a Nobel laureate in physics for all I know--but that's who products like the email server III are aimed at.
P.S. Incedently, I do own every version of SuSE professional since 7.0, and I will continue to buy them.
Thank you.
* Alain Barthelemy (abarthel@iph.fgov.be) [011122 01:01]:
Yes I know something about mail server because Postfix is now running but it is not my speciality
I'm sure you do, I guess shouldn't have even mentioned your post. You aren't a Nobel laureate are you?
There are people yhat know more about e-mail server than I and that's why I send my question to the list, not to launch a debate about "should I buy Email server III or not": it looks too muck like MS policy.
Because we read through the docs you can't find, create a full ldap/imap/pop mailserver and ask for money for it we're MS now?
If you want me to send you all my logs and config files, OK, just tell me which ones. I am running inetd.conf if you want to know. I did not have time yet to learn xinetd (too much time spent trying to find a manual about cyrus-imap).
My point was that you didn't include any of the information in the first place...what an I supposed to guess?
I solved my problem with mu inability to read my Mailbox. I just changed START_CYRUS="yes" to START_CYRUS="no" in /etc/rc.config because it was the Cyrus implementation that causes problems of password reading (which problem I don't know) even if I typed rccyrus stop. I found where the problem was after making a telnet 110.
I saw that...it suggests that maybe you were starting the daemon twice (once from inetd and once from the cyrus init script) but I don't know since I couldn't see the logs or inetd.conf.
Sorry I don't have enough pocket money to buy Email server III.
I don't either, but whether your boss spends the money on a "canned" solution (Sendmail has a very nice one, ours, or whatever) or pays you for 20 hours to build one yourself he's still spending the money.
Not easy to convince a majority of MS or Apple users to try Linux when you are the only person to know something (even little) about servers configuration.
I don't know about MS, but I don't see how setting up something like this on OSX will be any easier. -- -ckm
Thanks for answering and sorry to disturb you again. I thought that to install an imap server should as easy (I mean not impossible) than installing a pop/smtp server.
Because we read through the docs you can't find, create a full ldap/imap/pop mailserver and ask for money for it we're MS now?
imap/pop is enough and pop is already running with Postfix
My point was that you didn't include any of the information in the first place...what an I supposed to guess?
My problem at the beginning was which info or doc
I saw that...it suggests that maybe you were starting the daemon twice (once from inetd and once from the cyrus init script) but I don't know since I couldn't see the logs or inetd.conf.
Thus there is a cyrus init script. I suppose it is /etc/cyrus.config. I
already send it nth times and I supposed nobody could read it (I have
personaly trouble interpreting it).
# standard standalone server implementation
START {
# do not delete these entries!
mboxlist cmd="ctl_mboxlist -r"
deliver cmd="ctl_deliver -r"
# this is only necessary if using idled for IMAP IDLE
# idled cmd="idled"
}
# UNIX sockets start with a slash and are put into /var/imap/socket
SERVICES {
# add or remove based on preferences
imap cmd="imapd" listen="imap" prefork=0
# imaps cmd="imapd -s" listen="imaps" prefork=0
pop3 cmd="pop3d" listen="pop3" prefork=0
# pop3s cmd="pop3d -s" listen="pop3s" prefork=0
# sieve cmd="timsieved" listen="sieve" prefork=0
-----
### Comment: I uncommented imaps, pop3s because it is too early to play with
###SSL.
### Sieve too: for later
-----
# at least one LMTP is required for delivery
lmtp cmd="lmtpd" listen="lmtp" prefork=0
# lmtpunix cmd="lmtpd" listen="/var/imap/socket/lmtp" prefork=0
-----
###Comment: difference between lmtp and lmtpunix?
###I tried to find a manual who could explain me clerly the meaning of
prefork.
-----
==============================
Here is inetd.conf: I still need to uncomment a few lines (rlogin ...)
imap line I uncommented it then recommented it but nothing changed.
# See "man 8 inetd" for more information.
#
# If you make changes to this file, either reboot your machine or send the
# inetd a HUP signal with "/sbin/init.d/inetd reload" or by hand:
# Do a "ps x" as root and look up the pid of inetd. Then do a
# "kill -HUP <pid of inetd>".
# The inetd will re-read this file whenever it gets that signal.
#
#
Sorry I don't have enough pocket money to buy Email server III.
I don't either, but whether your boss spends the money on a "canned" solution (Sendmail has a very nice one, ours, or whatever) or pays you for 20 hours to build one yourself he's still spending the money.
Of course ...
Not easy to convince a majority of MS or Apple users to try Linux when you are the only person to know something (even little) about servers configuration.
I don't know about MS, but I don't see how setting up something like this on OSX will be any easier.
I know that it will not be obvious with MacOSX, that's why I prefer SuSE/Linux
Greg Johnson wrote:
Please stop pushing Email Server III. I paid good money for Email Server II and now I am screwed. You do not have a reasonable upgrade path. There is not a reasonable support mechanism for email server II (upgrades and patches). and the software is still full of bugs.
Now, Email Server III costs 3x what I paid for Email server II. With the upgrade price being the difference (2 more X what I paid). Email server II was already outdated versions of free software, the only thing of value was SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (7.0). The rest was crap.
No. The value was that you got a pre-configured, running Cyrus IMAP, OpenLDAP, postfix system. When you do that yourself it will take you between 1-3 days the first time you do it, depending on how much you already know. For $299 we took care of that. If the time you would have to spend to setup a similar configuration be less valuable than that, you would have been better off to assemble everything yourself, that's true. The value is in the package, not in the software, which is indeed all open-source. We did include some web stuff like the vacation or procmail settings, but this is not often needed if one uses an imap mailclient. EM III is so much more expensive because it bundles a commercial component that provides most of the UI and all the calendar functionality. As for the bugs, we use EM II ourselves. Never had any issues. I even used the webinterface from a TV with internet access from a hotel room (resolution 640x480, terrible keyboard). The webinterface does hacve it's issues, agreed. I (personally) consider the most value in EM II and III the combination of user-less system (all are in LDAP) and postfix and Cyrus IMAPD, and those three work together very well right from the start. Try to configure that stuff yourself (I did once as a consulting job. Not too difficult if you're a reasonably good admin, but it takes lots of time).
I am still running it, why? It takes a lot of effort to change a mail system that more than you use. As for my investment in Email server II? Shame on me...
MH
Quoting Michael Hasenstein
Greg Johnson wrote:
[a bunch of stupid banter purged (my own)] Linux Enterprise Server (7.0). The rest was crap.
No. The value was that you got a pre-configured, running Cyrus IMAP, OpenLDAP, postfix system. When you do that yourself it will take you between 1-3 days the first time you do it, depending on how much you already know. For $299 we took care of that. If the time you would have to spend to setup a similar configuration be less valuable than that, you would have been better off to assemble everything yourself, that's true. The value is in the package, not in the software, which is indeed all open-source. We did include some web stuff like the vacation or procmail settings, but this is not often needed if one uses an imap mailclient.
You are correct, and that was the value I wanted ang I did get. I was having a bad day and went off on the wrong thing. Sorry. I had just run into several of the annoying items in EM II and I guess I let it out. I guess my gripe is that EM II is not real easy to keep up to date. YOU works well for me, but is not in this version of SLES.
EM III is so much more expensive because it bundles a commercial component that provides most of the UI and all the calendar functionality.
I was not aware of that. That might make it more valuable.
As for the bugs, we use EM II ourselves. Never had any issues. I even used the webinterface from a TV with internet access from a hotel room (resolution 640x480, terrible keyboard). The webinterface does hacve it's issues, agreed. I (personally) consider the most value in EM II and III the combination of user-less system (all are in LDAP) and postfix and Cyrus IMAPD, and those three work together very well right from the start. Try to configure that stuff yourself (I did once as a consulting job. Not too difficult if you're a reasonably good admin, but it takes lots of time).
The userless system is wonderful. I only use the web interface right now. It has many bothersome quirks, but I am getting used to it. EM II does have value for me. I just want to be able to stay up-to-date. If nothing else, it has shown what packages to hook together and how. I will probably overtime recreate much of this on whatever current version of SuSE pro I have running at the time. Thanks, Greg gjohnson@frozen.com
participants (7)
-
Alain Barthelemy
-
Bartydeux
-
Christopher Mahmood
-
Greg Johnson
-
Jerry Kreps
-
Michael Hasenstein
-
Paul Miles