Re: [SLE] Executable exists but bash says it doesn't
Paul Abrahams
pwa@suillus:/usr/local/TeX/bin/i386-linux > ldd ./tex /usr/bin/ldd: ./tex: No such file or directory
It seems ldd needs shlibs5 in order to find that tex depends on them. I still suggest that you install shlibs5. I'm sorry for the misleading test with ldd. -- Alexandr.Malusek@imv.liu.se
Alexandr Malusek wrote:
Paul Abrahams
writes: pwa@suillus:/usr/local/TeX/bin/i386-linux > ldd ./tex /usr/bin/ldd: ./tex: No such file or directory
It seems ldd needs shlibs5 in order to find that tex depends on them. I still suggest that you install shlibs5. I'm sorry for the misleading test with ldd.
Thanks, Alexandr. That did it!!! As I like to say about such things, "intuitively obvious, of course, to the most casual observer". Paul
Alexandr Malusek wrote:
Paul Abrahams
writes: pwa@suillus:/usr/local/TeX/bin/i386-linux > ldd ./tex /usr/bin/ldd: ./tex: No such file or directory
It seems ldd needs shlibs5 in order to find that tex depends on them. I still suggest that you install shlibs5. I'm sorry for the misleading test with ldd.
Now that we know that the missing shlibs5 was the problem, the next question comes up: in general, how could one know that? (A fishing rod is better than a fish.) Paul
participants (2)
-
Alexandr Malusek
-
Paul Abrahams