[SLE] bogomips issues in 2.2.15 kernel
Hello Linux folks, I've noticed a pretty interesting issue when I downloaded and compiled new 2.2.15 kernel. Old bogomips values on my home SMP PII-400 linux box were: CPU0 - 400.08 CPU1-399.89 with kernel 2.2.14 Old bogomips value on my work CentaurHauls C6 200MHz linux box was: 79.67 with kernel 2.2.14 New bogomips values on my home SMP PII-400 linux box are: CPU0 - 800.18 CPU1-799.97 with kernel 2.2.15 New bogomips value on my work CentaurHauls C6 200MHz linux box is: 79.67 with kernel 2.2.15 I didn't change kernel configurations in both these cases. Does it mean that kernel 2.2.15 was noticeably improved over 2.2.14 kernel? Thanks for any suggestions, Alex -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Alex Daniloff wrote:
Hello Linux folks, I've noticed a pretty interesting issue when I downloaded and compiled new 2.2.15 kernel. Old bogomips values on my home SMP PII-400 linux box were: CPU0 - 400.08 CPU1-399.89 with kernel 2.2.14 Old bogomips value on my work CentaurHauls C6 200MHz linux box was: 79.67 with kernel 2.2.14 New bogomips values on my home SMP PII-400 linux box are: CPU0 - 800.18 CPU1-799.97 with kernel 2.2.15 New bogomips value on my work CentaurHauls C6 200MHz linux box is: 79.67 with kernel 2.2.15 I didn't change kernel configurations in both these cases. Does it mean that kernel 2.2.15 was noticeably improved over 2.2.14 kernel? Thanks for any suggestions, Alex
Well, that limits my previous statement about bogo mips even to the same kernel level. Do you "feel" it's faster? I mean an improvement of factor 2 should be noticeable. I still state forget about bogo mips. Take a serious benchmark program. Juergen -- =========================================== __ _ Juergen Braukmann juergen.braukmann@gmx.de| -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Tel: 0201-743648 dk4jb@db0qs.#nrw.deu.eu | /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / ===========================================_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Ok, this is going to make me sound like a newbie and that I have no idea what is going on.... What is a bogomip? -----Original Message----- From: juergen.braukmann@ruhr-west.de [mailto:juergen.braukmann@ruhr-west.de] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 4:20 PM To: SuSE Linux English Subject: Re: [SLE] bogomips issues in 2.2.15 kernel Alex Daniloff wrote:
Hello Linux folks, I've noticed a pretty interesting issue when I downloaded and compiled
new
2.2.15 kernel. Old bogomips values on my home SMP PII-400 linux box were: CPU0 - 400.08 CPU1-399.89 with kernel 2.2.14 Old bogomips value on my work CentaurHauls C6 200MHz linux box was: 79.67 with kernel 2.2.14 New bogomips values on my home SMP PII-400 linux box are: CPU0 - 800.18 CPU1-799.97 with kernel 2.2.15 New bogomips value on my work CentaurHauls C6 200MHz linux box is: 79.67 with kernel 2.2.15 I didn't change kernel configurations in both these cases. Does it mean that kernel 2.2.15 was noticeably improved over 2.2.14 kernel? Thanks for any suggestions, Alex
Well, that limits my previous statement about bogo mips even to the same kernel level. Do you "feel" it's faster? I mean an improvement of factor 2 should be noticeable. I still state forget about bogo mips. Take a serious benchmark program. Juergen -- =========================================== __ _ Juergen Braukmann juergen.braukmann@gmx.de| -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Tel: 0201-743648 dk4jb@db0qs.#nrw.deu.eu | /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / ===========================================_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
NOC - KULISHdotCOM wrote:
Ok, this is going to make me sound like a newbie and that I have no idea what is going on.... What is a bogomip?
It's a house number displayed at bootup, marking clock speed. But it's CPU dependent and just a number as good as any other, i.e. 42 (fourtytwo), which is the best ;-). We had this discussion on the list in the past, you might find something in the archives. Juergen -- =========================================== __ _ Juergen Braukmann juergen.braukmann@gmx.de| -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Tel: 0201-743648 dk4jb@db0qs.#nrw.deu.eu | /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / ===========================================_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Hello Juergen, I noticed some speed increase on my home linux system with 2.2.15 kernel and I didn't notice any difference on my work linux system with the same kernel. I think it is because my home SMP linux box is running Reiser FS which is generally faster than ext2. For my home system I patched 2.2.15 kernel with stable release of ReiserFS ver. 3.5.18. For my work linux system I left kernel 2.2.15 as it was with default ext2 FS. Regards, Alex On Fri, 12 May 2000, juergen.braukmann@ruhr-west.de wrote:
Alex Daniloff wrote: > >
Hello Linux folks, I've noticed a pretty interesting issue when I downloaded and compiled new 2.2.15 kernel. Old bogomips values on my home SMP PII-400 linux box were: CPU0 - 400.08 CPU1-399.89 with kernel 2.2.14 Old bogomips value on my work CentaurHauls C6 200MHz linux box was: 79.67 with kernel 2.2.14 New bogomips values on my home SMP PII-400 linux box are: CPU0 - 800.18 CPU1-799.97 with kernel 2.2.15 New bogomips value on my work CentaurHauls C6 200MHz linux box is: 79.67 with kernel 2.2.15 I didn't change kernel configurations in both these cases. Does it mean that kernel 2.2.15 was noticeably improved over 2.2.14 kernel? Thanks for any suggestions, Alex
Well, that limits my previous statement about bogo mips even to the same kernel level. Do you "feel" it's faster? I mean an improvement of factor 2 should be noticeable. I still state forget about bogo mips. Take a serious benchmark program.
Juergen
-- =========================================== __ _ Juergen Braukmann juergen.braukmann@gmx.de| -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Tel: 0201-743648 dk4jb@db0qs.#nrw.deu.eu | /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / ===========================================_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
Rule about bogomips: Don't believe in it! My 486 reports bogomips half of the actual clock speed while my P133 reports exactly the clock speed (well actually I was jibbed by 1X10^-4 MHz, but heck it's close enough) Just forget about the numbers and try to get the info off a dos diagnostic tool would be a bit more reliable, or use a linux benchmark program. (I don't usually praise dos tools, but they do detect MHz right) Calyth -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
"Calyth" == Calyth
writes:
> Rule about bogomips: Don't believe in it! My 486 reports > bogomips half of the actual clock speed while my P133 reports > exactly the clock speed (well actually I was jibbed by 1X10^-4 > MHz, but heck it's close enough) Just forget about the numbers > and try to get the info off a dos diagnostic tool would be a bit > more reliable, or use a linux benchmark program. (I don't > usually praise dos tools, but they do detect MHz right) Actually you can find out the CPU MHz in Linux. Just use: cat /proc/cpuinfo Charles -- ===================================================== One Net to rule them all, One Net to find them, One Net to bring them all, and with Linux bind them. ===================================================== -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
participants (5)
-
alex@daniloff.com
-
calyth@home.com
-
cpchan@myna.com
-
juergen.braukmann@ruhr-west.de
-
noc@kulish.com