SUSE are listed as running an open mail relay - I can't believe it
Hello all, Seems that at least 3 of us have stopped receiving the list, and my ISP has said that they are grey-listing, without being too specific. I have gone to: http://www.ordb.org/lookup/ and entered lists.suse.com and found that it had been added to the open relay database at 2004-01-09 17:02 GMT [which corresponds well with my last email from the list at 17:14]. Can anyone verify if it is true that SUSE really are running an open mail relay? regards Vince Littler
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yes, seems they have been. See here (suse-security): http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security/2004-Jan/0182.html On Sunday 11 January 2004 12:32, Vince Littler wrote:
Hello all,
Seems that at least 3 of us have stopped receiving the list, and my ISP has said that they are grey-listing, without being too specific. I have gone to:
and entered lists.suse.com and found that it had been added to the open relay database at 2004-01-09 17:02 GMT [which corresponds well with my last email from the list at 17:14].
Can anyone verify if it is true that SUSE really are running an open mail relay?
regards
Vince Littler -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQIVAwUBQAGNiN6AspoXaofZAQJP1g/7BbbHZixx3DtbIgw02GmTc0TsnCmSF9+k m16E/Cj3Jh9sTceddMj/9H8k+V9Xmgrmebeaa8G137r4/leGd8miqKTaVOqwj43r 5+RaGSfuljSStLMjIbFzXBYInc4aDO2hHmeMk9DmxPEuvIaoIs9/y5PYk5CDO/N2 4bxQCyRAN+7NCZYniVWcr1SQ2eXej3YcxqfBCRAw/JSPEqErenf4pfgz8wemQHPe 4iXjYDYPPry9K4H5MNGpOJZT/nqtI4ssucv3GO+ZsOkOzG1vsBVtD9EZzuDA79KG BW0GLca5NmJyg2oljy2hlFJ476NxlttmVIqoYMfOqMrSnqCAYjfhJ9/yiO8RZpUV jVCnw/VPFxswFRFxwT5TOyIGNN1n9gCFRCkEA0GugCWo5R3nBUufLhPeLaBQODtR XZnecgKSEeIQDQeofdujGNIb6qk3fdkpdX060JFIykGNVVgsZe2gdsMqiAZ2i1VD qtewqYHSAx8NtpXyJU5OqSJpbGUym2+3h8buu5hWf9I6a/vyf9mOJ/gP53nwpBg4 pG3KrExSeHcXqQBAZS2i6rTAQZGVKAFIbBGBTXSnKqs4TS3yXGZewU/ilcqVqqcC PGk4OFx7hCL6XfbWG+RV42EokQ7JAq38SmK1Dr6m+anrB2+YWiDg5OA8nm2vMhUq GBq2/UtBQPM= =YMqV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 05:32:22PM +0000 or thereabouts, Vince Littler wrote:
Seems that at least 3 of us have stopped receiving the list, and my ISP has said that they are grey-listing, without being too specific. I have gone to:
and entered lists.suse.com and found that it had been added to the open relay database at 2004-01-09 17:02 GMT [which corresponds well with my last email from the list at 17:14].
Can anyone verify if it is true that SUSE really are running an open mail relay?
suse email IP address is not listed in any other rbl database anywhere.. check http://www.senderbase.org/?searchBy=ipaddress&sb=1&searchString=195.135.221.131 -- Gary
Sun, 11 Jan 2004, by suse@archipelago.eclipse.co.uk:
Hello all,
Seems that at least 3 of us have stopped receiving the list, and my ISP has said that they are grey-listing, without being too specific. I have gone to:
and entered lists.suse.com and found that it had been added to the open relay database at 2004-01-09 17:02 GMT [which corresponds well with my last email from the list at 17:14].
Yep, I noticed that Saturday morning just after midnight when I saw suse.com in the REJECTed list of pflogsumm. See my mail with Subject "Oops: ORDB" Luckely I don't depend on an ISP for my mail, so silencing a DNLbl is easy enough.
Can anyone verify if it is true that SUSE really are running an open mail relay?
Not easily I think. They're running Qmail, which is a fscking PITA to configure 100% correctly, not to mention it's inability to work as the user intends instead of how DJB thinks it should work. Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 27N , 4 29 45E. SUSE 8.2 Kernel k_athlon-2.4.20 See headers for PGP/GPG info.
Sun, 11 Jan 2004, by twe-suse.e@ferrets4me.xs4all.nl: scratch the last paragraph in X-Message-Number-for-archive: 174931 please, that was a rather pre/postmature conclusion. Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 27N , 4 29 45E. SUSE 8.2 Kernel k_athlon-2.4.20 See headers for PGP/GPG info.
participants (4)
-
Adalberto Castelo -
Gary -
Theo v. Werkhoven -
Vince Littler