Amanda appears to be messed up in 6.4 ?
Hi All, Has anyone else noticed problems with the installation of Amanda in SuSE 6.4 Intel ? The supplied rpm is amanda-2.4.1p1-90. Despite this having been compiled with sbindir="/usr/sbin", those files are in fact residing in /usr/bin. Not surprisingly a number of the Amanda programs don't work properly. I seem to have 3 options: 1. Try to fix the broken distribution by making symlinks under /usr/sbin. 2. Try to get SuSE to provide me with a bugfixed version of the rpm. 3. Get the sources and recompile/install myself. What would you recommend ? (Or am I hopelessly confused..) (PS. The reason I'm using 6.4 is that that is what is on the box, and it's a production server that I can't just go messing about with.) -- Andy McClements Network Manager The London Institute HEC 65 Davies St. London W1Y 2DA Tel. +44 (0)20 7514 6051 Fax. +44 (0)20 7514 6046 GSM. 07776 303734
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:30:02PM +0100, Andy McClements wrote:
Hi All,
Has anyone else noticed problems with the installation of Amanda in SuSE 6.4 Intel ?
The supplied rpm is amanda-2.4.1p1-90. Despite this having been compiled with sbindir="/usr/sbin", those files are in fact residing in /usr/bin. Not surprisingly a number of the Amanda programs don't work properly.
I seem to have 3 options:
1. Try to fix the broken distribution by making symlinks under /usr/sbin. 2. Try to get SuSE to provide me with a bugfixed version of the rpm. 3. Get the sources and recompile/install myself.
You better recompile from the latest source. -Kastus
What would you recommend ? (Or am I hopelessly confused..)
(PS. The reason I'm using 6.4 is that that is what is on the box, and it's a production server that I can't just go messing about with.)
-- Andy McClements Network Manager The London Institute HEC 65 Davies St. London W1Y 2DA Tel. +44 (0)20 7514 6051 Fax. +44 (0)20 7514 6046 GSM. 07776 303734
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
* Andy McClements
Hi All,
Has anyone else noticed problems with the installation of Amanda in SuSE 6.4 Intel ?
The supplied rpm is amanda-2.4.1p1-90. Despite this having been compiled with sbindir="/usr/sbin", those files are in fact residing in /usr/bin. Not surprisingly a number of the Amanda programs don't work properly.
3. Get the sources and recompile/install myself.
Yes -- AMANDA stinks on 6.4. I would recompile and install myself. -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort." -- A. P. J.
Hi All, Thanks to those who replied. The concensus is that Amanda IS messed up on SuSE 6.4, and should be replaced by a freshly compiled install. I retained my original config. and data files, using the following configure: ./configure --with-user=amanda --with-group=disk --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --with-tape-device=/dev/nst0 Then removed the original package. I only had to recreate /etc/dumpdates and set correct permissions. Subsequent testing showed no problems with the new install. (Yet..) Regards, Andy
Andy McClements
[Jun 25. 2001 04:30]: Has anyone else noticed problems with the installation of Amanda in SuSE 6.4 Intel ?
The supplied rpm is amanda-2.4.1p1-90. Despite this having been compiled with sbindir="/usr/sbin", those files are in fact residing in /usr/bin. Not surprisingly a number of the Amanda programs don't work properly.
-- Andy McClements Network Manager The London Institute HEC 65 Davies St. London W1Y 2DA Tel. +44 (0)20 7514 6051 Fax. +44 (0)20 7514 6046 GSM. 07776 303734
participants (3)
-
Andy McClements
-
Konstantin (Kastus) Shchuka
-
Mads Martin Jørgensen