Is anyone else receiving these mails? They appear to be bounces from someone of messages to the list that I sent ages ago (and that reached the list OK) On Wed, 1969-12-31 at 23:59 +0000, postoffice@address.invalid wrote:
The original message was received at 2005-05-05 12:19:17 +0100 from postoffice.armilan [10.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
-----Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to postoffice.armilan.:
RCPT To:
<<< 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: armisis@dsl.pipex.com 550 ... User unknown email message attachment On Wed, 1969-12-31 at 23:59 +0000, postoffice@address.invalid wrote: On Thursday 10 March 2005 10:55, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: FAM (File Alteration Monitoring) fits in there somewhere. Do you know why, by any chance? I really hate to have to use fam. -- Kind regards Hans du Plooy SagacIT (Pty) Ltd hansdp at sagacit dot com
-- Kind regards Hans du Plooy SagacIT (Pty) Ltd hansdp at sagacit dot com
On 5/5/05, Hans du Plooy
Is anyone else receiving these mails? They appear to be bounces from someone of messages to the list that I sent ages ago (and that reached the list OK)
I'm getting them as well, likely anyone whose posted to the list in the last few days will get them as well. The guilty party has probably deleted their mailbox at pipex, but failed to unsub first. Best, Ben
On Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:43 AM, Ben Higginbottom wrote:
?On 5/5/05, Hans du Plooy
Is anyone else receiving these mails? They appear to be bounces from someone of messages to the list that I sent ages ago (and that reached the list OK)
I'm getting them as well, likely anyone whose posted to the list in the last few days will get them as well. The guilty party has probably deleted their mailbox at pipex, but failed to unsub first.
Best,
Ben
Makes sense to me. His server bouncing to the list and then all of us getting that message. Greg W
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 15:20 +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
Is anyone else receiving these mails? They appear to be bounces from someone of messages to the list that I sent ages ago (and that reached the list OK) My apologies, my mail came in long after this was discussed.
-- Kind regards Hans du Plooy SagacIT (Pty) Ltd hansdp at sagacit dot com
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 15:20 +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
Is anyone else receiving these mails? They appear to be bounces from someone of messages to the list that I sent ages ago (and that reached the list OK) --Snip--
Yeah, I'm getting them too. Some of the bounced emails are from a while ago, not just the past few days. That's the weird part. All the bounces I've gotten are from March. Although, that's the last time I posted to this list. -- Preston
The Thursday 2005-05-05 at 09:16 -0500, Preston Kutzner wrote:
Yeah, I'm getting them too. Some of the bounced emails are from a while ago, not just the past few days. That's the weird part. All the bounces I've gotten are from March. Although, that's the last time I posted to this list.
Be patient, you'll get them all - the ·$$%&/&%$ is still bouncing back every single mail from the list since february, and that's a lot of work for a single missconfigured MTA! :-p -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Yeah, I'm getting them too. Some of the bounced emails are from a while ago, not just the past few days. That's the weird part. All the bounces I've gotten are from March. Although, that's the last time I posted to this list.
Be patient, you'll get them all - the ·$$%&/&%$ is still bouncing back every single mail from the list since february, and that's a lot of work for a single missconfigured MTA!
Bwa ha ha!! Now, that's a happy thought! At least I haven't received any more bounces for two hours now. And I was really curious too, if the header_checks I set would work. Sandy
Sandy Drobic wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Yeah, I'm getting them too. Some of the bounced emails are from a while ago, not just the past few days. That's the weird part. All the bounces I've gotten are from March. Although, that's the last time I posted to this list.
Be patient, you'll get them all - the ·$$%&/&%$ is still bouncing back every single mail from the list since february, and that's a lot of work for a single missconfigured MTA!
Bwa ha ha!! Now, that's a happy thought! At least I haven't received any more bounces for two hours now. And I was really curious too, if the header_checks I set would work.
So, all you have to do, is go back in time a couple of months and resend your messages. ;-)
The Thursday 2005-05-05 at 17:15 +0200, Sandy Drobic wrote:
Be patient, you'll get them all - the ·$$%&/&%$ is still bouncing back every single mail from the list since february, and that's a lot of work for a single missconfigured MTA!
Bwa ha ha!! Now, that's a happy thought! At least I haven't received any more bounces for two hours now. And I was really curious too, if the header_checks I set would work.
X'-)
Yes, same thing here. Right after I modified the access file, it stopped.
I don't know if my change would work. Pity.
[...]
Wrong, I got some more, 17. It works, I'm happy:
May 6 00:52:25 nimrodel postfix/smtpd[17371]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
localhost[127.0.0.1]: 554
participants (7)
-
Ben Higginbottom
-
Carlos E. R.
-
Greg Wallace
-
Hans du Plooy
-
James Knott
-
Preston Kutzner
-
Sandy Drobic