Re: Re: [SLE] installing suse 7.3 - again ;))
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 21:26:10 +0100, =?iso-8859-2?Q?Stanis=B3aw_Pendyk?=
Cd into the dir suse you'll see a file called inst-sys.tar.gz
you need to run tar -zxvf inst-sys.tar.gz in the suse dir.
I unpacked it (under windows)
When you boot from the floppy and it askes for cd1 hit cancel, you get kicked into text base install
mode. Select your language and keyboard lay out. After you have made those 2 selections, It will bring you into another menu with a couple of options, one of them being Start Installation/Upgrade. Dont go to that yet. the to the very top of this menu, hit enter, it will bring up more options, The very Last option will be Advanced Mode (or something along the lines of that)
It's debug(expert) menu
go to that and hit enter. THE ONLY
THING YOU NEED TO CHANGE HERE, is when it askes should the new image be loaded when found, select YES.
it's menu load rootimage into ramdisk (???)
Just hit enter untill it kicks you out of the advance mode selection, hit ESC to go back
to to the root menu (the one where Start Installation/Upgrade is) and go into Start Installation/Upgrade, select install from Hard Drive, enter the correct info and you on your way.
I write source dir (/suse) and it's not helping I can not manage it. I think I'll download 7.3-evaluation iso image and maybe I'll install it. Thanks anyway Sasza
--- 99 zl tylko tyle zaplacisz za 4 linijki tekstu w Biuletynie reklamowym http://www.promocja.cc.pl/biuletyn ---
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
no no no no no were going to get this damn thing installed and workin weather SuSE likes it or not. Let me give you the basic rundown as of why, and whats going on in SuSE's little corner of the Linux world. Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to paying customers. BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if they pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things. 1) There is no file that lists the dependencies of the packages, you just have to either know what needs what or take guesses. 2) The help for installing from the ftp it self or downloading from the ftp to you hard drive and installing is slim to none. 3) Seince there is no help and no way of knowing the package dependencies, peeps on fast lines and lots of hdd space will just download the whole thing (most peeps on slower lines will give in right there and either go to some other distro or go out and buy SuSE (the WHOLE point behind whats happening)) But after the users with fast lines (and some with slow) get the distro off the FTP go to make ISO's and burn them to install that way.... But wait a minute there is nothing that tells you what files and dirs go where on the cds. Some might give up here and go to other distros or just go out and buy SuSE (Again, the whole point behind it). 4) Those that decide to continue and try to install from their hard drive, or install off the FTP its self find there is next to nothing in the help files and the "SuSE book" on how exactly to go about it. (As a matter of fact, I think i'm going to write a help file on this and place it some where else other then SuSE). They run into problems and cant get help from SuSE about it and there really isn't anything anybody anywhere to help them. So what happens? Thats right, the end user gets throws his hands up in disgust and either goes to another distro or goes out and buys it (And again, The WHOLE POINT behind it) 5) the devious little bastards tarballed the inst-sys dir and kinda whispered it to people so they really wouldnt pay much attention and keep gettin errors on the install and give up and go out and buy it (Once again, THE WHOLE POINT behind it) What I mean when I say whisper it to people. They cleverly place about a readme in the root dir of the ftp distro right next to about 4 other readmes that are the EXACT SAME THING over and over, so you see the last read me and think, "its says the samn thing as the others", and move on. When in reality, its not the samn as the others and its the ONLY thing out there that tells you that the inst-sys dir is tarballed and needs to be extracted inorder for the install to work. 6) The only ISO on thir FTP is the live eval ISO. And this isn't even really worth the CD you put it on. And all it is, is a bootable version of SuSE that runs off the CD rom drive. In Windows terminoligy you could call it the "Try before you Buy" version of SuSE. Which you download slap it on a CD, boot from it, and go "Wow, this is awesome. I think I'll install this" at which point they begin searching the FTP for an install ISO so they either decide to do a package by package download (In wich case, please see #'s 1-5) or they say "Crap no install ISO, and I dont know the first thing about downloading and installing Linux package by package, and there is nothing that helps me on this". Now there are 2 directions the user can go from here. a) The users opens his wallet and says "Fark, I dont have enough to go out and buy this. Well I'll go check out the Mandrake or Red Hat site." And thats it, SuSE has lost the customer. or...... b) The user opens his wallet and says "Damn i'm sittin fat!", user glances at watch. "Still have enough time to run up to Best Buy or Circut City and buy it!!" The user then hauls ass to the nearist retail store where they can buy SuSE and do so. and once again... THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT BEHIND ALL OF THIS So fuck these money hungry bastards, you've spent all this time and hard drive space getting it. Now you gonna sit there and install it, and I dont care if you have to stay up all night and all day (like I had to do) in order to get it working. cuz fuck SuSE for they have turned into. Well go out and buy the next version. But DAMN them all to hell and back untill then, Were getin 7.3 for free. :) NOTE: Good fellow SuSE users, belive me when I say this, SuSE used to never EVER be this way. I dont know fully know what the f*k happened to them. And belive me when I say this, The SuSE linux distro really is somethign special, and its not their software or their distro i'm angry at. Its SuSE them selfs. I've been using SuSE for a number of years now and I do belive in supporting good software I have and will still support SuSE. And I understand that what they have done has been for development costs. And I understand in a push to buy rather then to download. I Have bought SuSE in the past, and will buy in the future. Its just this is not a push, this is more like a violent shove to buy their product. And understand where I'm comeing from, I started using suse back in 1997. and back then there was no push to buy it. In fact there were not that many distro's AND NOT A SINGLE ONE PUSH YOU TO BUY. You could buy it, if you chose, and if you did buy it, you paid for the cost of the CD and for shipping and handling. THAT WAS IT! And they actually encouraged you to give it out to other people for free. Times have indeed changed and thats a WHOLE nother topic of discussion. But anyways, on to what I was saying. I dont make alot of money, and I sure there are a lot of others out there just like me, and I cannot afford to keep droppin all this damn money on a new SuSE distro EVERTIME one comes out. I DO belive in supporting them and I DO support them WHEN I CAN. alright, nuff fuckin said lets get on with this.. Ok. I sounds like you have downloaded it onto a windows partition. No problems there. Thats how I did it. BUT you do need to know what partition it is on inorder to do an install from hdd ok lets say we downloaded everything to: d:\suse so inside d:\suse looks like this: /disks /dosu /dosutils /full-names /setup /suse /unsorted archives.gz autorun.inf copying copying.tex COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.yast index.gz liesmich liechmich.dos ls-lR.gz pubring.pgp readme readme.dos readme.ftp setup.exe setup.mnu setup.pif thats the root dir or DIRectory now you need to change dir into the suse dir inside there you'll find a BUNCH of dirs atarting with a1 and ending with zg1 (or some crap like that) and 1 tar.gz file or tarball called inst-sys.tar.gz. In windows. I extracted it with winzip 8.0 and it worked fine. but when you extract it, do it in the suse dir so it will make its own dir. So in winzip you would extract inst-sys.tar.gz to: d:\suse\suse and the archive will make its own folder under d:\suse\suse called inst-sys so when winzip is done, you can go into the new dir and look around if you like, nothing else to do here though. But make sure the inst-sys dir is at: d:\suse\suse\inst-sys Also under the dir d:\suse\suse there will be another folder named images you need a few things in here inorder to install. 1) A kernel. I got the kernel k_deflt.rpm or in the readme it is shown as k_deflt_24: Pentium-optimized kernel 2.4 2) I really trully do not know if you need the inf file for the kernel you get or not, lets be safe and get it anyway 3) You will need the file initdisk.gz 4) you will need the file root with those 4 things you are almost ready to install Next you need to know what partition it is on. This I really cant tell you I will try to give you as much help as I can on finding it out though, but a little trial and error may be needed to figure it out. It really depends on how your hard drives and cd roms are setup as to what partition you will install from. I'll show a simple setup. 1 hard drive that has 2 dos partitions and 1 cdrom drive hda or your hard drive | c:\ or in linux hda1 | extended dos partiton or in linux hda2 | d:\ (logical dos drive) or in linux hda3 hdb or your cdrom drive your first hard drive will be called hda (or if i remember right Hard Disk (or drive) a )) your first partition on your first hard drive will be hda1. Your second partition gets a little trickier. In dos, inorder to get a second partition you have to creat 2 partitions to make 1. Yes scrath your head a little it makes no sence to me either. You have to creat the Extended Dos Partition and then you can creat the Logical Dos Drive. In windows, it will view both of those partitions as one. in linux they are viewd as 2 seprate partitions. The Extended Dos Drive is viewd as hda2 and the Logical Dos Drive is viewed as hda3. BUT you can only mount 1 of them. And that is the logical dos drive or hda3 in linux. Your cdrom drive is removable media and is viewed as just hdb. Thats a simple setup. now throw another cd/dvd rom drive and another hard drive in there and the partition tables can get rather confusing to a beginner. It all depends on what is where and how things are jumpered on how it will effect the partition tables. For example: on my computer I have 2 cdroms and 2 hard drives this is how it is setup hda is my primary hard drive and is jumpered for it hdb is my cdrom drive jumpered as primary slave hdc is my secondary hard drive and is jumpered for it hdd is my cd burner jumpered for secondary slave this is how this can help. When I downloaded SuSE off their FTP it was on my second hard drive. So when I went to install it, i knew it was somewhere on hdc. now lets try to add some partitions to this table. hda | hda1 or c:\ | hda2 had linux on it windows never know it was there | hda3 linux swap windows never knew it was there hdb cdrom drive hdc | hdc5 (dont ask me how it got named hdc5 as it was the ONLY partition on the drive.) or d:\ in windows hdd cdburner It can be confusing. But at least try to remember everything on the first hard drive is hda, if there is a second hard drive on the same daisy chain as the mast hard drive then everything on it is hdb. If your like me, My hard drives are on two diffrent dasiy chains and there is a cdrom inbetween them. So my primary hard drive is hda my secondary hard drive is hdc. So if you are set up like me and you downloaded suse on to your secondary hard drive then it will be some where on hdc. your just gonna have to do trial and error untill you get it. I hate to say it, but thats how that goes. once you have a good idea of what partiton it is on you can make the bood disk (already sounds like you did that so we will skip that) make sure the floppy is in the floppy drive (in linux the floppy drives are called fd0 for primary fd1 for secondary and so on) and then reboot. when you boot off the floppy, is fists asks you what resolution you want, you can just hit enter or select you resolution you'd like to use during the install and then hit enter. The next time the boot stops and asks you for anything it wall say Please make sure CD1 is in the CDROM drive <ok> <cancel> cd's who needs stinking cd's? hit cancel. Bam, were are kick into the old text base install of SuSE. and the next question is language. So select the language you would like to use. and hit enter. Up next is keybard keymap, select your keymap then hit enter. Now you are at the main menu and it should look something like this settings system information kernel modules (system information) start installation/system exit/reboot power off you first need to go under settings under settings you will see language display keymap debug (expert) we need to go to debug (expert) under there you will find animation load root image into radick enter root image installation system specify NFS port bootp timeout here are the settings you need animation = yes load root image into ramdisk = yes enter root image = here you have to tell it where the root image is. and seince we are still using d:\suse as the example this will be /suse/suse/images/root edit to fit your setup installation system = remember inst-sys.tar.gz you had to extract? well you have to tell yast where that extracted to also. Again seince d:\suse is the example the correct filed would be /suse/suse/inst-sys edit to fit your setup specify NFS port = leave this blank bootp timeout = leave this as it is hit the ok button. then go back into the Main Menu. If you need to load any special modules now would be the time to do it, go to kernel modules if you have to load modules. If you only have an IDE hard drive and are installing from a windows partition, you shouldnt need any. now back at the Main Menu goto Start Installation/System from there go to: Start Installation/Update from there goto: Harddisk and this is where you need to know what partition you downloaded suse to. you have tho have this correct as well as Enter Root Image and Installation System correctly pointing to where everything is. so you downloaded suse to d:\oogabooga\suse\ the the fields for Enter Root Image would be /oogabooga/suse/suse/images/root and for inst-sis it would be /oogabooga/suse/suse/inst-sis and if you downloaded suse to hdc2 then the correct field for the partition would be /dev/hdc2. You'll know when you get it right because it will find and load the root image into the ramdisk and the installation will continue and I belive the first this it asks is which hard drive are you going to install to. But my fingers are about to fall off so i hope you can make it through the install after you get everything mounted and the root image loaded. If not, let me know, I'll walk you though that too. another way to aproach this is with the live eval cd. Now this is untested as far as I know. But Download the live eval iso. Burn it. Make sure to have it placed in first cdrom drive. reboot. set bios to boot from cdrom. computer will boot off the cdrom. once booted set up hard disk (partition and format). mount it. then cd to it, then mkdir / , then copy EVERYTHING from the cd to into the / dir. once everthing is over, cd to /etc (on hard drive of course) and edit the file fstab edit accordingly. oh yeah, you might want to have lilo downloaded on another partition, cuz your really gonna need it. extract lilo, cd into lilo dir. read some readmes in there to learn how to installl. install it.. reboot. pray BUT I WILL MENTION IT AGAIN!! I HAVE NOT TRIED THAT METOD OF INSTALL AND I DONT KNOW ANY ONE WHO HAS SO I DONT KNOW IF IT WILL WORK OR NOT. YOU PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK HERE. if someone gets this working, let me know :) -one_inch one_inch@hotpop.com
As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase. In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives. Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000. I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies. A few of many things to ponder.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry >bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to paying >customers. BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their >FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if they pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 07:09, Dwaine Felch wrote:
As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase.
SuSE had its reasons for not providing ISO's...But do other non-linux companies provide iso's of their software? No. Also as mentioned by a Slashdot poster a site that purely linked to ISO's closed due to lack of interest. Then, people fail to mention the Live-Eval version that SuSE make, this takes the place of an ISO IMHO in that it gives. As for the greed, well if they get to greedy someone else can compete with relative ease. But capitalism relies on greed, he who makes money actually grows and is able to put that back into R&D.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
Thats bs, why? Open Source, if you fail to "compete" someone will make a Linux distribution that will target that angry audience. "Linux" advertising, all the advertising has been pretty much through IBM, whether or not we'll see individual distributions doing heavy MS style advertising remains to be seen, but then you're not purely talking about Linux. Get the difference? You're looking at Linux through Microsoft glasses, something MS keep doing.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
Then why are you here trolling? I have found the opposite to you, dound w2k to be clunky and badly laid out, whilst KDE2x has been a dream for me. These types of statements are useless, like Gnome VS KDE. Quite a few prefer Gnome over KDE, BlackBox over everything else etc. Which just goes to show that the Windows default "cannot really be changed much" approach is not the best. Ever try OSX? Its way better too than Windows interface, easy to navigate and learn, but for me it lacks reconfigurability. As for 100X more bugs, how can you tell? Did you see the code in W2k and KDE and compared?
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
Perhaps they have just spent the last three years developing, but without them actually releasing anything I don't know (and I doubt that they have the technical aptitude to do so, totally different environment for one, and having so much flexibility will probably throw them for a loop).
A few of many things to ponder.
Not really, most are opinion based without facts, which makes me wonder whether you're just out trolling? Matt
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry >bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to paying >customers. BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their >FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if they pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Ah, nice to see a Microsoft Shill posting. Actually, there are free upgrades, you just need
to put forth some effort to acquire them. Unlike Microsoft for which there are no free
upgrades, the upgades are generally bug fixes of the previous buggy OS, and there are
tremendous numbers of security holes which the user is paying good money to install on
their computer.
Glad you like 2000, it crashes rather consistently on my system while SuSE linux does
not. Faster? what the hell are you doing, running 2000 on a P 4 and running linux on a
486?
Get a life, most of the people on this list know the truth.
02/16/02 09:09:11 AM, Dwaine Felch
As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
A few of many things to ponder.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry > bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to paying > customers. BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their > FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if they pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
A few of many things to ponder.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry > bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to
BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down
server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if
Linux upgrades are bug fixes for the previous buggy OS, in case you are too
blind
to see that. No free upgrades from M$, what do you call each version of
Explorer.
Security holes? I have an inbox full of linux security updates just in the
last month,
M$ security holes are widely advertised and linux holes are overlooked by
the media.
One independent government study showed linux had more holes than Mac or
Win2k.
In my 20 years as a IT specialist I have tested more different OSs and
computer
hardware configurations than your shallow mind could ever dream of. I enjoy
a healthy
different opinion that is how we learn. Your intolerance to someone else
experience
probably gets you nowhere in life.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Bliss [mailto:bliss@attbi.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:43 AM
To: Dwaine Felch
Cc: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Subject: Re: [SLE] installing suse 7.3 - again ;))
Ah, nice to see a Microsoft Shill posting. Actually, there are free
upgrades, you just need
to put forth some effort to acquire them. Unlike Microsoft for which there
are no free
upgrades, the upgades are generally bug fixes of the previous buggy OS, and
there are
tremendous numbers of security holes which the user is paying good money to
install on
their computer.
Glad you like 2000, it crashes rather consistently on my system while SuSE
linux does
not. Faster? what the hell are you doing, running 2000 on a P 4 and
running linux on a
486?
Get a life, most of the people on this list know the truth.
02/16/02 09:09:11 AM, Dwaine Felch
pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 09:06:32 -0800, Dwaine Felch
Linux upgrades are bug fixes for the previous buggy OS, in case you are too blind to see that. No free upgrades from M$, what do you call each version of Explorer. Security holes? I have an inbox full of linux security updates just in the last month, M$ security holes are widely advertised and linux holes are overlooked by the media. One independent government study showed linux had more holes than Mac or Win2k.
In my 20 years as a IT specialist I have tested more different OSs and computer hardware configurations than your shallow mind could ever dream of. I enjoy a healthy different opinion that is how we learn. Your intolerance to someone else experience probably gets you nowhere in life.
-----Original Message----- From: James Bliss [mailto:bliss@attbi.com] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:43 AM To: Dwaine Felch Cc: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] installing suse 7.3 - again ;))
Ah, nice to see a Microsoft Shill posting. Actually, there are free upgrades, you just need to put forth some effort to acquire them. Unlike Microsoft for which there are no free upgrades, the upgades are generally bug fixes of the previous buggy OS, and there are tremendous numbers of security holes which the user is paying good money to install on their computer.
Glad you like 2000, it crashes rather consistently on my system while SuSE linux does not. Faster? what the hell are you doing, running 2000 on a P 4 and running linux on a 486?
Get a life, most of the people on this list know the truth.
02/16/02 09:09:11 AM, Dwaine Felch
wrote: As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
A few of many things to ponder.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry > bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to paying > customers. BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their > FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if they pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
SuSE claim that they have removed the x86 ISO'S from their FTP because of development costs. And I understand that they need money to help support their cause. But I feel they dont need to take down their ISO's and shove shove shove to get people to go out and buy their software. And I do recall stating that SuSE does deserve to be supported and that I DO SUPPORT them WHEN and WHERE I CAN. I dont make alot of money and I'm sure there is alot of others out there that dont make alot of money either and feel the ame way about supporting SuSE. There are alot of Newbies out there that dont know the first thing about downloading a distrobution package by package and installing from a hard drive OR makeing ISO'S out of the packages and installing that way. And SuSE provides NO HELP on this subject. I have talked to LOTS of people on IRC that are interested in giving suse a go and dont want to fool around with live eval cds, if they wanted to do that they would go get Demo Linux. They want it on their hdd and test it on their actual system, BUT again they dont know how to go about getting the distro package by package, And AGAIN, SuSE has no help files or howto 's on this subject matter. Or they really dont feel like going through the BS of it. ALSO They dont want to go out and buy it because if they dont like it, they just wasted their money. So SuSE is in turn shooting its self in the foot. They are hurting them selfs more then helping them selfs. if everyone will please find my earlier message I have a HUGE list of this concerning this matter, If everyone will please find it and read it. This is a good topic to discuss, and it NEEDS to be explained and talked about but the SuSE employies. feed back, please one_inch
On Saturday 16 February 2002 12:26, "one_inch" wrote:
... I do recall stating that SuSE does deserve to be supported and that I DO SUPPORT them WHEN and WHERE I CAN. I dont make alot of money and I'm sure there is alot of others out there that dont make alot of money either... Amen, brother!
and feel the same way about supporting SuSE. I bought _at full price_ 6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3.
There are a lot of Newbies out there that don't know the first thing about downloading a distribution package by package and installing from a hard drive OR makeing ISO'S out of the packages and installing that way. You're talking about me! If interested, read my posting about Kernel 2.4.16.
Regards, gr (in sunny, warm Florida) **"In war, it counts not who's right, but who's left."** /Ann Landers/
Lets respond to your post by statements:
By the way, if you really want to argue about the merits of MS vs any other OS this is not
the proper forum. This is completely off topic and I personally should not be responding
to your post in this manner but for the great number of errors and misrepresentations made
in your post.
02/16/02 11:06:32 AM, "Dwaine Felch"
Linux upgrades are bug fixes for the previous buggy OS, in case you are too blind to see that. Hum, I wonder what the move to 2.4 from 2.2 was? Seems to have been a very large movement towards a better operating system, not a bug fix. You appear to need glasses and/or understand Linux a little better before you start making rash statements like this.
No free upgrades from M$, what do you call each version of Explorer. I thought we were discussing OSs here, or perhaps you believe that IE is an OS, LOL.
Security holes? I have an inbox full of linux security updates just in the last month, M$ security holes are widely advertised and linux holes are overlooked by the media. One independent government study showed linux had more holes than Mac or Win2k. You might want to read that study a little better, again, glasses may help here. Please check CERT and then get back to me on this. They are truely independent. Also, since you brought up the fantastic IE, you might want to REALLY check CERT and see what they have to say about the patch MS released just a little while back which "fixed all open security holes". Also interesting is that the patch was pulled from their web site in about 2 hours because it was buggy and not fully tested.
By the way, I am definitely not saying that linux does not have its bugs.
In my 20 years as a IT specialist I have tested more different OSs and computer hardware configurations than your shallow mind could ever dream of.
Interesting, how can you make a statement like this without even knowing 1) my experience and background and 2) expect me to blindly accept your representations of your experience and background?
I enjoy a healthy different opinion that is how we learn. Your intolerance to someone else experience probably gets you nowhere in life.
Just out of curiosity, you feel that this response shows any degree of tolerance (or your original post as far as that goes)? The term "shallow mind" is definitely a tolerant manner of discussion. And you, in a typical sign of a poor debater, resort to implied insults and puffing of one's chest about their own self importance. Sorry list, I will not respond to this guy again except via personal email, if at all.
<snip>
On Saturday 16 February 2002 17:06, Dwaine Felch wrote:
Linux upgrades are bug fixes for the previous buggy OS, in case you are too blind
To quote the ASR FAQ; "3.1) Are there any OSs that don't suck? No. See http://www.ehlke.net/os-suck.html" All software is buggy, incomplete, and in a state of continual flux until it dies. Such is the nature of software. However, unlike certain commercial vendors, the free software movement don't a) pretend that it's meant to be that way or b) deny that such problems ever existed in the first place (whilst taking pot shots at the bringers of bad news).
to see that. No free upgrades from M$, what do you call each version of Explorer.
Explorer is an app, not an OS in itself.
Security holes? I have an inbox full of linux security updates just in the last month, M$ security holes are widely advertised and linux holes are overlooked by the media.
That's only true to a certain extent. part of the hoo-hah that accompanies any Windows security breach is due to the facts that a) Windows is a monopoly OS and often used by people who really don't know how computers work (thus requiring loud noise to publicise problems, since such people don't go looking for bugfixes and patches of their own volition) and b) Windows holes have a nasty habit of granting complete access to everything on the computer; whereas Linux holes tend to be buffer overflows which *sometimes* grant root-exploitable holes. Pretty much any MS hole results in potential compromise of the entire system.
One independent government study showed linux had more holes than Mac or Win2k.
See http://lwn.net/2002/0207/ - I think you'll find that a) it wasn't a government study and b) the Linux vulnerabilities were summed over all distributions. The highest individual hole count in a Linux distro were with Mandrake and Deadrat (33 holes and 28 holes) - compared to Win NT/2000, which had 42. Additionally, *everything* in a Linux distro was counted; whereas the MS holes were just in the OS. According to that article, Debian 2.2 had 26 holes - in over 2,500 packages. How many security holes are there in an equivalent Windows box - comprising the OS and 2500 other packages, running the gamut from games to office software to programming software?
In my 20 years as a IT specialist I have tested more different OSs and computer hardware configurations than your shallow mind could ever dream of. I enjoy a healthy different opinion that is how we learn. Your intolerance to someone else experience probably gets you nowhere in life.
Yet you still haven't learnt to set line widths properly in your mail client...? Hmm. Dwaine Felch isn't exactly a common name; and look what I found in someone's guestbook... "Name: Dwaine Felch EMail: dwainf@microsoft.com Date: 6/29/2000 Time: 3:02:46 AM Remote User: HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0) Comments This is one of the finest web sites around it has earned a bookmark in my browser." It would, of course, be churlish of me to suggest that you'd been subject to "Redmond reprogramming"... *g* Gideon.
Let's start a free hardware movement, that will be great for the economy! :) :) -----Original Message----- From: Gideon Hallett [mailto:diogenes@freeuk.com] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 9:58 AM To: Dwaine Felch; James Bliss Cc: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] installing suse 7.3 - again ;)) On Saturday 16 February 2002 17:06, Dwaine Felch wrote:
Linux upgrades are bug fixes for the previous buggy OS, in case you are too blind
To quote the ASR FAQ; "3.1) Are there any OSs that don't suck? No. See http://www.ehlke.net/os-suck.html" All software is buggy, incomplete, and in a state of continual flux until it dies. Such is the nature of software. However, unlike certain commercial vendors, the free software movement don't a) pretend that it's meant to be that way or b) deny that such problems ever existed in the first place (whilst taking pot shots at the bringers of bad news).
to see that. No free upgrades from M$, what do you call each version of Explorer.
Explorer is an app, not an OS in itself.
Security holes? I have an inbox full of linux security updates just in the last month, M$ security holes are widely advertised and linux holes are overlooked by the media.
That's only true to a certain extent. part of the hoo-hah that accompanies any Windows security breach is due to the facts that a) Windows is a monopoly OS and often used by people who really don't know how computers work (thus requiring loud noise to publicise problems, since such people don't go looking for bugfixes and patches of their own volition) and b) Windows holes have a nasty habit of granting complete access to everything on the computer; whereas Linux holes tend to be buffer overflows which *sometimes* grant root-exploitable holes. Pretty much any MS hole results in potential compromise of the entire system.
One independent government study showed linux had more holes than Mac or Win2k.
See http://lwn.net/2002/0207/ - I think you'll find that a) it wasn't a government study and b) the Linux vulnerabilities were summed over all distributions. The highest individual hole count in a Linux distro were with Mandrake and Deadrat (33 holes and 28 holes) - compared to Win NT/2000, which had 42. Additionally, *everything* in a Linux distro was counted; whereas the MS holes were just in the OS. According to that article, Debian 2.2 had 26 holes - in over 2,500 packages. How many security holes are there in an equivalent Windows box - comprising the OS and 2500 other packages, running the gamut from games to office software to programming software?
In my 20 years as a IT specialist I have tested more different OSs and computer hardware configurations than your shallow mind could ever dream of. I enjoy a healthy different opinion that is how we learn. Your intolerance to someone else experience probably gets you nowhere in life.
Yet you still haven't learnt to set line widths properly in your mail client...? Hmm. Dwaine Felch isn't exactly a common name; and look what I found in someone's guestbook... "Name: Dwaine Felch EMail: dwainf@microsoft.com Date: 6/29/2000 Time: 3:02:46 AM Remote User: HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0) Comments This is one of the finest web sites around it has earned a bookmark in my browser." It would, of course, be churlish of me to suggest that you'd been subject to "Redmond reprogramming"... *g* Gideon. -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Wow, You have some work again. Prolly haven't had this much to do since you trolled OS/2 newgroups and lists back in the 90's. * Dwaine Felch (dwainef@earthlink.net) [020216 09:12]: ->Linux upgrades are bug fixes for the previous buggy OS, in case you are too ->blind to see that. No free upgrades from M$, what do you call each ->version of Explorer. Well, yes. They do fix bug with each upgrade and they do add features and the like to SuSE (linux is the kernel) And if you wish to pay for it you can or you can do like myself and just download the updates as provided. I'm still running SuSE 7.2 at work and it completely up to date..guess what...I never PAID a dime for those updates. I downloaded them and installed them. That's the neat thing about open source software is that you can update the software yourself for free or if you wish to pay for "convience" you can spend the $50 (not $100) for the CD's and new version of the books. You however had to pay for Windows 98 and Windows98SE which were no more then bug fixes...and you paid a lot more. You got a lot less as well. Did you get a compiler? Did you get a full developers suite with your OS? I think not. I think you got a barebones OS and would have to pay for it all. Did you get a full set of network utilities and all the server software to make one of your boxes a server and one a workstation? Oh that's right. You can't install the software on more then one machine legally or the BSA will come and take your first born child. Your upgrade arguement is weak and not very well thoughtout. *Ding* Try again. ->Security holes? I have an inbox full of linux security updates just in the ->last month, M$ security holes are widely advertised and linux holes ->are overlooked by the media. Please don't pull this crap. You know as well as I do that when a "security hole" is found in something like say...OpenSSH it's in OpenSSH and all Unix/Linux machines running this piece of software are vulnerable. And it's on ONE bug that effects everybody. Most of these lists of bugs are all the announcements from all the distributions to their users that a piece of software they shipped had this vunerablity. If you don't know that these sites you are referencing add up all of them together and then pit them against the bug reports from Microsoft then you are worse off then I thought. You can't lump RH, SuSE and Mandrake together and count all their bugs together because 9-10 times they are a bug in the same exact piece of software which means it's only one bug in a piece of software they ALL use. Your logic is flawed .. go back to Vulcan for retraining *buzzer*. ->One independent government study showed linux had more holes than Mac or ->Win2k. Please provide a URL..because "One Goverment study" is vague and doesn't prove anything. The Canadian Goverment studied if penguins fallover backwards when planes go by..so I have little faith in the label "Government study". ->In my 20 years as a IT specialist I have tested more different OSs and ->computer hardware configurations than your shallow mind could ever dream ->of. I enjoy a healthy different opinion that is how we learn. Your ->intolerance to someone else experience probably gets you nowhere in life. Well, I guess my intolerence of you people will just destroy the six figure salary I make. I guess I'll have to do what the MCSE's at work do and spend hours and hours running around chasing phantoms in the software that they can never hope to fix because they don't have source. I guess I'll return to not getting a good night sleep. I guess I'll have to reimage machines every 4-6 months because my environment just corrupts itself for no bloody reason at all. I guess I'll have to have an SLA about 5 nines uptime instead of just expecting 5 nines. I guess my OS will just be able to handle 500-600 accounts instead of the 100's of 1000's that my Sun boxes do. I guess I'll have to give up a cluster uptime of 6 years and go for 6 days like the Windows guys. I guess I'll get up at 1am every night and drive into the data centre to fix a simple problem and I'll give up my remote terminal server access which keeps me in my Pj's and not in the car. I guess I give up my truely boring, well working world for a "life". If you think that someone with the attitude of screw Microsoft won't amount to anything. I would say it's you who are blind. The engineering community has suffered through Managements choices of bad software long enough. We are intolerant..of crap. Yes, well..In my 15 years around computers the last 10 of which have been in corp. America..most people there just make fun of IT. While we in Engineering are busy actually working with technology. You people seem to want to run around fixing virus infections due to faulty software..you come in at 8:30am and leave at 5:30pm and don't really don't touch computers after work. This is my experience with IT. You really shouldn't make personal attacks like "shallow mind". You have to realize that you maybe talking to a very intelligent person who just doesn't want to deal with your trolling about the wonders of Microsoft software. I was "tolerant" if that's what you want to call it of you people when you came around on the OS/2 lists. I'm "tolerant" of you at work and I tolerate your ignorance in the market place. What I won't be tolerant of is you coming into a forum that I've been a part of for the better part of 5 years and just talking a bunch of shite. We don't care about Microsoft hence the name of the list. And we don't care to be insulted by someone who can not do any real research and provide fact instead of opinion. We will not be tolerant anymore of stupid people and with agenda's to keep themselves in their comfort zones which cause issues for the rest of us. And to tell the truth. I wish the list admin would just remove you. We have strived for a topic based list for the last year or so. And defending Microsoft and calling people who are sick of it "shallow minds" is SO far off topic it's not funny. Hey! Look .. I think your W2K box just got Nimda..better go shut it up... Cheers! -----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====----- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org -----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====----- "I've never been quarantined. But the more I look around the more I think it might not be a bad thing." -JC
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 09:06, Dwaine Felch wrote:
Linux upgrades are bug fixes for the previous buggy OS, in case you are too blind to see that. No free upgrades from M$, what do you call each version of Explorer. Security holes? I have an inbox full of linux security updates just in the last month, M$ security holes are widely advertised and linux holes are overlooked by the media.
Oh, do you mean that one hole in an older app that happens to then be repeated across a wide range of distributions as they each issue their own advisory? Ever notice that most security holes happen to be local on Linux whilst Windows ones tended to be remote?
One independent government study showed linux had more holes than Mac or Win2k.
Got a link to that?
In my 20 years as a IT specialist I have tested more different OSs and computer hardware configurations than your shallow mind could ever dream of. I enjoy a healthy different opinion that is how we learn. Your intolerance to someone else experience probably gets you nowhere in life.
Don't ever boast about how many years experience you have, anyone with a few years worth of experience knows this raises a red flag. Why? Well I helped a Sys Admin with 30 years experience setup Sendmail so it could actually send and receive e-mail from outside the box. One of many reasons to not trumpet your horn about "20" years experience. Just like that techie who blinds some newbie with "techno-babble" to win an argument. I don't fall for it, nor do many others who probably have more experience than you do. Your arguments were weak without actually being backed up. Your arguments were delivered as fact, this is fine as long as they are worded as an opinion, which in your case they were not. Matt PS This is OT, but you've been slewing lots of factual errors, so it ends here as this place is to discuss SuSE Linux.
-----Original Message----- From: James Bliss [mailto:bliss@attbi.com] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:43 AM To: Dwaine Felch Cc: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] installing suse 7.3 - again ;))
Ah, nice to see a Microsoft Shill posting. Actually, there are free upgrades, you just need to put forth some effort to acquire them. Unlike Microsoft for which there are no free upgrades, the upgades are generally bug fixes of the previous buggy OS, and there are tremendous numbers of security holes which the user is paying good money to install on their computer.
Glad you like 2000, it crashes rather consistently on my system while SuSE linux does not. Faster? what the hell are you doing, running 2000 on a P 4 and running linux on a 486?
Get a life, most of the people on this list know the truth.
02/16/02 09:09:11 AM, Dwaine Felch
wrote: As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
A few of many things to ponder.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry > bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to paying > customers. BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their > FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if they pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Ah, nice to see a Microsoft Shill posting. Actually, there are free upgrades, you just need to put forth some effort to acquire them. Unlike Microsoft for which
upgrades, the upgades are generally bug fixes of the previous buggy OS, and there are tremendous numbers of security holes which the user is paying good money to install on their computer.
Glad you like 2000, it crashes rather consistently on my system while SuSE
not. Faster? what the hell are you doing, running 2000 on a P 4 and running linux on a 486?
Get a life, most of the people on this list know the truth.
02/16/02 09:09:11 AM, Dwaine Felch
wrote: As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
A few of many things to ponder.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry > bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to
customers.
BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their > FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if
James:
I'll second the first poster's comments. Modern versions of Windows *are*
noticably faster than current SuSE Linux 7.3 Professional on my hardware,
too.
I recently upgraded my dual boot workstation (SuSE Linux 7.3 professional
and Windows) from Win2K to WinXP Home, and WinXP is even faster than
Win2K. It boots faster. It's display drivers are very fast. It's network
stack
seems faster than Win2K's.
The hardware is a 1.4 Ghz Athlon/Duron, 768 MB DDR PCI 2100 RAM,
Adaptec 2940U2W SCSI, Quantum Atlas 10K 18WLS Ultra/160 Wide SCSI
drive, and NVidia Riva TNT2 Model 64 Pro. This machine is on a fast, land
based network (768 kbit/sec, bidirectional).
I've noticed the same thing on my older 800 Mhz PIII system, which is also
dual boot, SuSE Linux 7.3 professional/Win 2K. Win2K also is much better
at dealing with Satellite networking latencies than SuSE Linux is. This PIII
system is on Starband.
Chris Shaker
cjshaker@shaker-net.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Bliss"
pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
You are not making an apples for apples comparison here, IMHO. You are
running WinXP home, which would suggest to me that you were running Win2K
Professional if not even Win2K Personal.
An apples for apples comparison would be to run Win2K Server and compare.
There is a huge difference between Win2K professional and Win2K Server,
speed drops dramatically while power increases dramatically.
Or, in the alternative, turn off many of the services which I would imagine you are
running on the SuSE install and then compare.
I have compared Win2K Server without IIS running against a SuSE 7.3 with
Apache, Tomcat and SuSEfirewall2 running. SuSE goots at least 50% faster and
performance in X is equivalent when using KDE and much faster when running
fvwm95. Needless to say, X is not used that often since that is not the purpose of
the SuSE installation, which would have also been true with Windows if the
capability to avoid the GUI was even possible.
Jim
02/17/02 11:33:19 AM, "Christopher John Shaker"
James:
I'll second the first poster's comments. Modern versions of Windows *are* noticably faster than current SuSE Linux 7.3 Professional on my hardware, too.
I recently upgraded my dual boot workstation (SuSE Linux 7.3 professional and Windows) from Win2K to WinXP Home, and WinXP is even faster than Win2K. It boots faster. It's display drivers are very fast. It's network stack seems faster than Win2K's.
The hardware is a 1.4 Ghz Athlon/Duron, 768 MB DDR PCI 2100 RAM, Adaptec 2940U2W SCSI, Quantum Atlas 10K 18WLS Ultra/160 Wide SCSI drive, and NVidia Riva TNT2 Model 64 Pro. This machine is on a fast, land based network (768 kbit/sec, bidirectional).
I've noticed the same thing on my older 800 Mhz PIII system, which is also dual boot, SuSE Linux 7.3 professional/Win 2K. Win2K also is much better at dealing with Satellite networking latencies than SuSE Linux is. This PIII system is on Starband.
Chris Shaker cjshaker@shaker-net.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Bliss"
To: "Dwaine Felch" Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:42 AM Subject: Re: [SLE] installing suse 7.3 - again ;)) Ah, nice to see a Microsoft Shill posting. Actually, there are free upgrades, you just need to put forth some effort to acquire them. Unlike Microsoft for which there are no free upgrades, the upgades are generally bug fixes of the previous buggy OS, and there are tremendous numbers of security holes which the user is paying good money to install on their computer.
Glad you like 2000, it crashes rather consistently on my system while SuSE linux does not. Faster? what the hell are you doing, running 2000 on a P 4 and running linux on a 486?
Get a life, most of the people on this list know the truth.
02/16/02 09:09:11 AM, Dwaine Felch
wrote: As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
A few of many things to ponder.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry > bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to paying > customers. BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their > FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if they pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
You are not making an apples for apples comparison here, IMHO. You are running WinXP home, which would suggest to me that you were running Win2K Professional if not even Win2K Personal.
An apples for apples comparison would be to run Win2K Server and compare. There is a huge difference between Win2K professional and Win2K Server, speed drops dramatically while power increases dramatically.
Or, in the alternative, turn off many of the services which I would imagine you are running on the SuSE install and then compare.
I have compared Win2K Server without IIS running against a SuSE 7.3 with Apache, Tomcat and SuSEfirewall2 running. SuSE goots at least 50% faster and performance in X is equivalent when using KDE and much faster when running fvwm95. Needless to say, X is not used that often since that is not the
the SuSE installation, which would have also been true with Windows if the capability to avoid the GUI was even possible.
Jim
02/17/02 11:33:19 AM, "Christopher John Shaker"
wrote: James:
I'll second the first poster's comments. Modern versions of Windows *are* noticably faster than current SuSE Linux 7.3 Professional on my hardware, too.
I recently upgraded my dual boot workstation (SuSE Linux 7.3 professional and Windows) from Win2K to WinXP Home, and WinXP is even faster than Win2K. It boots faster. It's display drivers are very fast. It's network stack seems faster than Win2K's.
The hardware is a 1.4 Ghz Athlon/Duron, 768 MB DDR PCI 2100 RAM, Adaptec 2940U2W SCSI, Quantum Atlas 10K 18WLS Ultra/160 Wide SCSI drive, and NVidia Riva TNT2 Model 64 Pro. This machine is on a fast, land based network (768 kbit/sec, bidirectional).
I've noticed the same thing on my older 800 Mhz PIII system, which is also dual boot, SuSE Linux 7.3 professional/Win 2K. Win2K also is much better at dealing with Satellite networking latencies than SuSE Linux is. This PIII system is on Starband.
Chris Shaker cjshaker@shaker-net.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Bliss"
To: "Dwaine Felch" Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:42 AM Subject: Re: [SLE] installing suse 7.3 - again ;)) Ah, nice to see a Microsoft Shill posting. Actually, there are free upgrades, you just need to put forth some effort to acquire them. Unlike Microsoft for which there are no free upgrades, the upgades are generally bug fixes of the previous buggy OS, and there are tremendous numbers of security holes which the user is paying good money to install on their computer.
Glad you like 2000, it crashes rather consistently on my system while SuSE linux does not. Faster? what the hell are you doing, running 2000 on a P 4 and running linux on a 486?
Get a life, most of the people on this list know the truth.
02/16/02 09:09:11 AM, Dwaine Felch
wrote: As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become
Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money,
James:
You may well be correct that SuSE Linux outperforms Win2K on a
server. I've never attempted to use Windows on a server. I run SuSE
7.3 Professional on my SMP K7 server.
I'm talking about speed comparisons on my workstations. I own
Win2K Professional, because that is the only Windows release that
my previous employer currently supports for work applications (they
now also support RedHat Linux 7.2). I've since purchased WinXP Home
edition, and now use that instead of Win2K. I didn't run any server
processes on Win2K, and I'm not under WinXP either. I'm not running
any server processes on this workstation when I boot SuSE 7.3
professional on it. Even inetd is turned off.
When running under Windows, I'm usually running Outlook Express
6.0 and IE 6.0. When running under SuSE Linux, I'm running KDE,
Kmail, and Konquorer.
Chris Shaker
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Bliss"
continue to increase.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the
other
evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
A few of many things to ponder.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry > bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to
customers.
BUT, belive me when I say this, SuSE would be more then happy to take down their > FTP server and all other mirrors. But they cant cuz Linus would have nothing to do with it. and the GPL will not allow it. Their says would be numbered if
will paying > they
pulled a stunt like that. So you can still get SuSE for free off the FTP server, BUT not in an install ISO form. You have have to download it package by package. And this is where they get really shitty about some things.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
On Sunday 17 February 2002 09:33, Christopher John Shaker wrote:
I recently upgraded my dual boot workstation (SuSE Linux 7.3 professional and Windows) from Win2K to WinXP Home, and WinXP is even faster than Win2K. It boots faster. It's display drivers are very fast. It's network stack seems faster than Win2K's.
The hardware is a 1.4 Ghz Athlon/Duron, 768 MB DDR PCI 2100 RAM, Adaptec 2940U2W SCSI, Quantum Atlas 10K 18WLS Ultra/160 Wide SCSI drive, and NVidia Riva TNT2 Model 64 Pro. This machine is on a fast, land based network (768 kbit/sec, bidirectional).
Even Microsoft doesn't consider XP Home an upgrade from 2K, since it drops several features of 2K. You can't make a blanket statement about XP being faster, particularly since it is optimized for IDE drives and not for SCSI. I don't know anyone who has tested an XP system for SCSI disk writes in blocks > 256KB without finding an Achilles' heel of XP. I'll grant you that XP may be easier to install on a system like yours, where 2K will be lacking many required drivers, or may fail to install even the ones which it has on the CD.
On Sunday 17 February 2002 09:33, Christopher John Shaker wrote:
I recently upgraded my dual boot workstation (SuSE Linux 7.3
and Windows) from Win2K to WinXP Home, and WinXP is even faster than Win2K. It boots faster. It's display drivers are very fast. It's network stack seems faster than Win2K's.
The hardware is a 1.4 Ghz Athlon/Duron, 768 MB DDR PCI 2100 RAM, Adaptec 2940U2W SCSI, Quantum Atlas 10K 18WLS Ultra/160 Wide SCSI drive, and NVidia Riva TNT2 Model 64 Pro. This machine is on a fast, land based network (768 kbit/sec, bidirectional).
Even Microsoft doesn't consider XP Home an upgrade from 2K, since it drops several features of 2K. You can't make a blanket statement about XP being faster, particularly since it is optimized for IDE drives and not for SCSI. I don't know anyone who has tested an XP system for SCSI disk writes in blocks > 256KB without finding an Achilles' heel of XP. I'll grant you
James:
I never had a problem installing Win2K on this or any other hardware.
It *was* a pain in the rear installing all of the updates from the windows
update site, with the many reboots required to get it done.
It's also a pain in the rear applying all of the required updates for
Office 2K... StarOffice is a lot easier and quicker to install.
As far as IDE vs SCSI performance under WinXP home, my wife's
workstation is an IDE based system, and mine is the SCSI system
detailed below. Her machine has an 1.533 Ghz AMD Athlon XP.
Both have MSI Via KT266 based motherboards. Both seem equally
zippy running WinXP Home edition.
Win2K was the first Microsoft OS that was worth beans. Win 3.0, 3.1,
Win95, Win98, and Win98SE all sucked rocks. I've suffered through
them all.
I used to use FreeBSD, Corel Linux Deluxe, Corel Linux Deluxe Second
Edition, Debian Woody, SuSE Linux 7.2 Professional, and now use SuSE
Linux 7.3 Professional. It works pretty well on my SMP K7 server.
Chris Shaker
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Prince"
XP may be easier to install on a system like yours, where 2K will be lacking many required drivers, or may fail to install even the ones which it has on the CD.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
I have to disagree with you on ms putting out a good linux version, look at all the security holes in there os an bugs. I do think that w2k is much better then win9x ever thought about being, but suse is so much better an you get more then just an os with suse, you get 7 cds an one dvd with the pro version, an its cheaper then w2k is for a better value.
As far as security holes, read the CERT announcements.
There are tons of security holes in the Linux tools, too.
Chris Shaker
cjshaker@shaker-net.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Malone"
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've
worked
with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies. I have to disagree with you on ms putting out a good linux version, look at all the security holes in there os an bugs. I do think that w2k is much better then win9x ever thought about being, but suse is so much better an you get more then just an os with suse, you get 7 cds an one dvd with the pro version, an its cheaper then w2k is for a better value.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
* Christopher John Shaker (cjshaker@shaker-net.com) [020217 09:35]: ->As far as security holes, read the CERT announcements. ->There are tons of security holes in the Linux tools, too. -> Could we all get it through our heads that the holes are holes in pkgs shipped with both UNIX and Linux distributions. They are not holes in the Linux kernel...but holes suffered across the board. If WuFTPD has a hole on AIX it will have the same hole on SuSE as it has on Solaris as it has on FreeBSD. Windows..all the holes reported for Windows are on Windows for Windows..it's special (Mr. Rogers Voice). So..if SuSE, Redhat and Mandrake report holes in WuFTPD..it's one hole not three holes. It can't be three when it's the same exploit. Also, you can go to any security site that isn't NTBugtraq or some WinCentric site and count the bugs yourself if you do it properly and see that Windows has so many more exploits and holes then Unix software does. Please do not say LiNUX has the hole unless it's a kernel exploit..say that blah blah has an exploit and lets leave it there. -----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====----- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org -----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====----- "I've never been quarantined. But the more I look around the more I think it might not be a bad thing." -JC
I would suggest that this entire thread end and the board return to what it is
supposed to be, to request assistance with SuSE Linux.
There are so many discrepancies which exist in the statements from both sides in
this thread it is getting rather silly. Unless we can sit down in a room and sanely
discuss what is being said by each person and then list the specific items, this
thread will just keep running in circles. We would have to agree on what OS
holes exists and what are application specific holes.
This would also include sitting down with an identical box and setting it up with
two separate hard disks, one with Windows and one with SuSE Linux. This
would not be a dual boot machine since Windows is much more demanding in
how it installs than Linux and may cause problems with the Linux installation, but
would be two separate hard drives, one installed for Windows, setup and then
removed and then the Linux drive installed and setup (or vice versa, I do not
care). We would go through the various services which are running in each OS
and attempt to reach some sort of concensus on what is equal and what is not.
Then we would swap the two hard drives in and out and compare performance.
Both boot and application. This would include installing the correct QT libraries
for performance as well as other libraries. All security patches should be applied
so that we are comparing performance for the best security available at that time.
And we would attempt to install equivalent GUI packages, no more and no less.
Jim
02/17/02 12:51:46 PM, Ben Rosenberg
* Christopher John Shaker (cjshaker@shaker-net.com) [020217 09:35]: ->As far as security holes, read the CERT announcements. ->There are tons of security holes in the Linux tools, too. ->
Could we all get it through our heads that the holes are holes in pkgs shipped with both UNIX and Linux distributions. They are not holes in the Linux kernel...but holes suffered across the board.
If WuFTPD has a hole on AIX it will have the same hole on SuSE as it has on Solaris as it has on FreeBSD.
Windows..all the holes reported for Windows are on Windows for Windows..it's special (Mr. Rogers Voice).
So..if SuSE, Redhat and Mandrake report holes in WuFTPD..it's one hole not three holes. It can't be three when it's the same exploit. Also, you can go to any security site that isn't NTBugtraq or some WinCentric site and count the bugs yourself if you do it properly and see that Windows has so many more exploits and holes then Unix software does.
Please do not say LiNUX has the hole unless it's a kernel exploit..say that blah blah has an exploit and lets leave it there.
-----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====----- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org -----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====----- "I've never been quarantined. But the more I look around the more I think it might not be a bad thing." -JC
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
On Saturday 16 February 2002 07:09, Dwaine Felch wrote:
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
And now MS is attempting to convert everyone to XP, with far less recent hardware supported by 2K than by either linux or XP. If you don't like KDE, you've several alternatives in linux. You know already how much it will cost you to install linux on next month's new hardware products. With XP, you don't yet know whether it will be $150 or $950 per box, to support dual Hyper-Threaded CPU's.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
Surely you've read Bill's speeches about how you violate the terms of his licenses by use of anything GPL'd, even vim.
On Saturday 16 February 2002 11:48, Tim wrote:
And now MS is attempting to convert everyone to XP, with far less recent hardware supported by 2K than by either linux or XP.
Not to mention the infamous activation feature. *************************************************** Powered by SuSE Linux 7.3 Professional KDE 2.2.1 KMail 1.3.1 This is a Microsoft-free computer Bryan S. Tyson bryantyson@earthlink.net ***************************************************
On Saturday 16 February 2002 10:09, Dwaine wrote:
As linux companies get a taste of money they have started to become like Microsoft, as we know is one of the best at raking in revenue. Just in the past year or year and half Suse and Mandrake had two releases each with no free upgrades. Suse quit providing ISOs for x86; with each turn of the corner linux companies decrease benefits and scam you for more money, this will continue to increase.
You must be joking. Buy the boxed set and quit complaining. For all you get they're practically giving it away.
In the coming years linux marketing will be no different than the other evil empire. It won't be long and people will be angry at linux and be looking for alternatives.
In my opinion the terms of GNU licensing and the nature of the open source community will prevent this from happening.
Myself have found Windows 2000 a much better OS than any linux I've worked with, W2k always runs faster and has a well laid out GUI with polished features; KDE is clunky and slow with a 100x more bugs and hicups than you will ever find in Windows 2000.
Win2k is the best version of Windows I've used. However, it does not come close to the enjoyment I get from my SuSE/KDE system. SuSE has the additional advantage that when I buy the pro set for $70 I not only have an outstanding OS, but 2300 applications that include virtually anything I could possibly need. Contrastingly, once I pay my $200 or whatever Win2k pro costs, I still need to spend hundreds or even thousands to load the system with the applications I need to be productive.
I think Microsoft is excellent at developing a product if they concentrated there efforts on a version of linux they would blow the doors off all other linux companies.
I agree MS has produced some very nice software. MS has also produced some poor software. Whether or not they could "blow the doors off" other Linux companies is not at all certain.
Ever seince SuSE version 7.1, SuSE has decided to become little money hungry >bastards and they no longer have the install ISO's on line, but they are available to paying >customers.
This poster is the one who sounds money hungry to me. In my opinion, if we want SuSE and other companies to be able to continue releasing this great software, the least we can do is buy the box. *************************************************** Powered by SuSE Linux 7.3 Professional KDE 2.2.1 KMail 1.3.1 This is a Microsoft-free computer Bryan S. Tyson bryantyson@earthlink.net ***************************************************
participants (11)
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
Bryan Tyson
-
Christopher John Shaker
-
Dwaine Felch
-
Gideon Hallett
-
gilson redrick
-
Jack Malone
-
James Bliss
-
Matthew Johnson
-
one_inch
-
Tim Prince