Any input for an Outlook 2003 user? I find the reply-to issue a bit of a pain as well, but if someone has a suggestion for dealing with it, I am game. Otherwise, I would vote for changing the reply-to to point to the list, not the individual sender. Regards...Michael
This also happens to me, though I use Mozilla Thunderbird as e-mail client... Other mailing lists work fine though... Daniel Michael Hyman wrote:
Any input for an Outlook 2003 user? I find the reply-to issue a bit of a pain as well, but if someone has a suggestion for dealing with it, I am game.
Otherwise, I would vote for changing the reply-to to point to the list, not the individual sender.
Regards...Michael
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, pinto wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2004 18:19, Michael Hyman wrote:
I find the reply-to issue a bit of a pain
~ maybe, hit the 'reply-to-all' button, and, then, delete all, except :
that's what i do with pine. i would switch to mutt and get the handy-dandy reply-to-list functionality, but i'm so used to the pine interface, it's taking a bit of effort to make the switch.. ot to pinto- you should check the formatting of your messages. both lines were preceded by so many tabs that they didn't fit in the reply. it looks like you were trying to right justify them for some reason (with the sle address displaying on a third line). -- trey
The Thursday 2004-03-18 at 13:35 -0500, Trey Gruel wrote:
that's what i do with pine. i would switch to mutt and get the handy-dandy reply-to-list functionality, but i'm so used to the pine interface, it's taking a bit of effort to make the switch..
procmail recipe, for pine, mozilla, whatever: # Add a Reply-To to this mail list, and move to the correct file. :0f * ^X-Mailinglist: suse-linux-e | /usr/bin/formail -bfi "Reply-To:suse-linux-e@suse.com" :0 a: $HOME/Mail/lists/suse-linux-e # Complemented with: :0 * ^TO_suse-linux-e@suse.com $HOME/Mail/lists/in_dups :0 $HOME/Mail/lists/in_elresto -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
Way to go Carlos! But mutt still rocks! Xenos
I'm right there with you...I was asking for a better solution. So, I guess you don't have one. Thanks...Michael -----Original Message----- From: pinto [mailto:pinto45@aig.forthnet.gr] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:23 AM To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] Weird action of reply-to to list On Thursday 18 March 2004 18:19, Michael Hyman wrote:
I find the reply-to issue a bit of a pain
~ maybe, hit the 'reply-to-all' button,
and, then, delete all, except :
Sorry if my response sounded rude, it was. I did not mean for that, so I apologize! -----Original Message----- From: Michael Hyman [mailto:MHyman@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 2:54 PM To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: RE: [SLE] Weird action of reply-to to list I'm right there with you...I was asking for a better solution. So, I guess you don't have one. Thanks...Michael -----Original Message----- From: pinto [mailto:pinto45@aig.forthnet.gr] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:23 AM To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] Weird action of reply-to to list On Thursday 18 March 2004 18:19, Michael Hyman wrote:
I find the reply-to issue a bit of a pain
~ maybe, hit the 'reply-to-all' button,
and, then, delete all, except :
pinto wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2004 18:19, Michael Hyman wrote:
I find the reply-to issue a bit of a pain
~ maybe, hit the 'reply-to-all' button,
and, then, delete all, except :
I just highlight the address and start typing in sus and Mozilla picks up the rest of the address from my address book. However, sometimes I forget and have to drag the message from the send folder to drafts and resend to the list.
participants (7)
-
Carlos E. R. -
Daniel Secareanu -
James Knott -
Michael Hyman -
pinto -
Trey Gruel -
Xaos Katawin