[opensuse] Could somebody test this? (xterm or jstar bug)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have found what could be a bug. Please test this in 11.2 so that I know if it is only me or can be confirmed, and thus open the bugzilla. Open an xterm - I use gnome, maybe that is relevant, dunno. Type "jstar p" to edit file "p". Press and keep pressed "-". What happens to me is that before 150 dashes, it crashes. I see something like this: - --*** glibc detected *** jstar: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08145a30 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= It doesn't happen if I press "=". Weird, isn't? - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAks+g4UACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VWXwCfWCqAuDNJecjsy+uMkekTYjEX uIwAnic0gauoWF2Idj83EtzYAxBGlzHl =C4qE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 01 January 2010 21:21:34 Carlos E. R. wrote:
Hi,
I have found what could be a bug. Please test this in 11.2 so that I know if it is only me or can be confirmed, and thus open the bugzilla.
Open an xterm - I use gnome, maybe that is relevant, dunno.
Type "jstar p" to edit file "p".
Press and keep pressed "-".
What happens to me is that before 150 dashes, it crashes. I see something like this:
--*** glibc detected *** jstar: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08145a30 *** ======= Backtrace: =========
It doesn't happen if I press "=". Weird, isn't? I test in konsole and repeat the error with "-" and no error with "=". -- José Thadeu -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 2010-01-01 at 21:32 -0200, Jose Thadeu Pinto Dantas Cavalcante wrote:
I test in konsole and repeat the error with "-" and no error with "=".
You get an error typing dashes in joe? It crashes? Good. I mean, bad, of course. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAks+idAACgkQtTMYHG2NR9XCFQCfRb7toSi7Cso/rXFjHSVBMNQh t1EAnRekPf34CLmsrWRKiB8BwxnMXaeJ =eZum -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 01/01/10 20:48, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Friday, 2010-01-01 at 21:32 -0200, Jose Thadeu Pinto Dantas Cavalcante wrote:
I test in konsole and repeat the error with "-" and no error with "=".
You get an error typing dashes in joe? It crashes? Good. I mean, bad, of course.
OK, it crashes in xterm, not in yakuake though.. ope a bug report pls. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 2010-01-01 at 20:51 -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 01/01/10 20:48, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Friday, 2010-01-01 at 21:32 -0200, Jose Thadeu Pinto Dantas Cavalcante wrote:
I test in konsole and repeat the error with "-" and no error with "=".
You get an error typing dashes in joe? It crashes? Good. I mean, bad, of course.
OK, it crashes in xterm, not in yakuake though.. ope a bug report pls.
Done. 567870. Thanks :-) - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAks+j5EACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VFpQCgk+4HZXYtlrOSFn1ZbXsomUZU ctUAoJDU4sT4ycVuHDN5vLLeOm/fl4eN =ZAkR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:12:58 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
Done. 567870.
Had you searched a bit you would have found that there already was a bug report for this :) I've marked your bug a duplicate of it. Please try the joe package available from the editors OBS project. If this fixes the bug, I'll see that I can push an update when I'm back at work on the 11th. Philipp -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2010-01-02 04:29, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:12:58 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
Done. 567870.
Had you searched a bit you would have found that there already was a bug report for this :)
Well, I did RFC and trusted Cristian O:-)
I've marked your bug a duplicate of it. Please try the joe package available from the editors OBS project. If this fixes the bug, I'll see that I can push an update when I'm back at work on the 11th.
Yes, it solves this problem, thanks. - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 11.2 "Emerald" GM (bombadillo)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAks/SYAACgkQU92UU+smfQVSGQCfQQIWL6OAhWS9BxKYTAyWKJ/f zk8AmKVcyrJx8ZIQHMiikHltnFhZejY= =Sr0k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:26:24 +0100, you wrote:
Well, I did RFC and trusted Cristian O:-)
When I recommend to open a bug it implies that the OP should first search for matching bug reports.
Yes, it solves this problem, thanks.
Glad to hear that. I'll see if I can push an update. Philipp -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, 2010-01-03 at 20:32 +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:26:24 +0100, you wrote:
Well, I did RFC and trusted Cristian O:-)
When I recommend to open a bug it implies that the OP should first search for matching bug reports.
When somebody from Novell recomends opening a bugzilla, I take for granted that he knows already if it is reported or not. Plus, some of your colleagues think that double reporting is good, because that way it is known that it affects several people. I was told that on another ocassion, to report anywway. Otherwise, please all of you agree on a policy and tell us so.
Yes, it solves this problem, thanks.
Glad to hear that. I'll see if I can push an update.
Thanks. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktBGAUACgkQtTMYHG2NR9WLGwCbBHUjKCRRCuy1pg7znFXKxqA1 4s8AoITn0wgMHaZpMOVDfOVlaAhalwJG =RuyU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 03/01/10 19:19, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Sunday, 2010-01-03 at 20:32 +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:26:24 +0100, you wrote:
Well, I did RFC and trusted Cristian O:-)
When I recommend to open a bug it implies that the OP should first search for matching bug reports.
When somebody from Novell recomends opening a bugzilla, I take for granted that he knows already if it is reported or not.
That's rarely possible, unless you were previously Assigned to the bug or CC'ed.
Plus, some of your colleagues think that double reporting is good, because that way it is known that it affects several people. I was told that on another ocassion, to report anywway. Otherwise, please all of you agree on a policy and tell us so.
That's why duplicate resolution exists, however ideally it shouldnt be used ;) I understand that is usually not possible because bugzilla search engine is broken beyond repair and rarey returns something useful. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, 2010-01-03 at 19:24 -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 03/01/10 19:19, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Sunday, 2010-01-03 at 20:32 +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:26:24 +0100, you wrote:
Well, I did RFC and trusted Cristian O:-)
When I recommend to open a bug it implies that the OP should first search for matching bug reports.
When somebody from Novell recomends opening a bugzilla, I take for granted that he knows already if it is reported or not.
That's rarely possible, unless you were previously Assigned to the bug or CC'ed.
Sorry, I assumed you were in the know.
Plus, some of your colleagues think that double reporting is good, because that way it is known that it affects several people. I was told that on another ocassion, to report anywway. Otherwise, please all of you agree on a policy and tell us so.
That's why duplicate resolution exists, however ideally it shouldnt be used ;) I understand that is usually not possible because bugzilla search engine is broken beyond repair and rarey returns something useful.
It wasn't in the last 100 bugs displayed when I went in, at least. Or I didn't see it. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktBNLkACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Wu3wCdFY7w0RO01Za4gjjj62fD/hbh mNQAn2K5SlpxnDBMuAlvM4iUOz7fUxgL =jimE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:24:27 -0300, you wrote:
I understand that is usually not possible because bugzilla search engine is broken beyond repair and rarey returns something useful.
It would help immensely if bugzilla had a field for program and/or package as that could easily be searched (and it would enable auto-assignment of bugs :). Philipp -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, 2010-01-04 at 01:52 +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:24:27 -0300, you wrote:
I understand that is usually not possible because bugzilla search engine is broken beyond repair and rarey returns something useful.
It would help immensely if bugzilla had a field for program and/or package as that could easily be searched (and it would enable auto-assignment of bugs :).
Absolutely. We would enter the faulty component and we'd get a list of bugs reported on those components, hopefully with a summary. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktBP1oACgkQtTMYHG2NR9X9GACeOP+B6GntBwghawoXrWGeo7LJ xHwAniL38GaDj9dhzEy9d6Mw4kEXrOhX =LASq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 02:07:29 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
We would enter the faulty component and we'd get a list of bugs reported on those components, hopefully with a summary.
I'd suggest using openFATE to request such a thing. Philipp -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, 2010-01-04 at 23:07 +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 02:07:29 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
We would enter the faulty component and we'd get a list of bugs reported on those components, hopefully with a summary.
I'd suggest using openFATE to request such a thing.
You (Novell's employees) are the people most affected by bugzilla's shortcomings, so it should rather be you (plural) who requested such a thing. I don't like "fate", I don't like an open vote for technical issues, instead of technical merit. I no longer use fate. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktCfj4ACgkQtTMYHG2NR9WDsQCfZGV3NY51ceAi0EWoSwwqj1op eXMAn37Q1POblRstt7giBH1nTO4fB43p =7uC9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 00:48:11 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
I don't like "fate", I don't like an open vote for technical issues, instead of technical merit. I no longer use fate.
Fate is far from an open vote. It's the basis to discuss pros and cons of features, something that has no place in bugzilla. Philipp -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:57:23PM +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 00:48:11 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
I don't like "fate", I don't like an open vote for technical issues, instead of technical merit. I no longer use fate.
Fate is far from an open vote. It's the basis to discuss pros and cons of features, something that has no place in bugzilla.
On the one aka SUSE side you're right but on the other OSS side wrong. FATE is yet another demonstration of a development decission made several years ago when it had been close to impossible to implement the same inside bugzilla. If I get it right this changed. Now it is possible to store arbitrary state information like "needinfo" without special patches and hacks in bugzilla. I would appreciate if all the information is stored at one place. No more "this is a feature and not a bug" and no more "this is a bug and not a feature" replies. Yes, it's possible from inside fate to reference bug IDs. Do we have the same feature available from inside bugzilla? Do we need to maintain two infrastructures? How are other OOS companies doing this? RedHat uses Bugzilla for both. Let us drop bugzilla and use fate for both. ;) Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:35:25 +0100, you wrote:
If I get it right this changed. Now it is possible to store arbitrary state information like "needinfo" without special patches and hacks in bugzilla.
But IMNSHO bugzilla isn't the place to discuss pros and cons! This belongs to a different place, preferably an archived mailing list.
Do we have the same feature available from inside bugzilla?
AFAIK we don't.
How are other OOS companies doing this?
I have no idea either :(
Let us drop bugzilla and use fate for both. ;)
Oh no! Bug tracking in openFATE would be a bad idea, far more worse than feature tracking in bugzilla :) Philipp -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
--*** glibc detected *** jstar: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08145a30 *** ======= Backtrace: =========
On 01/01/10 20:21, Carlos E. R. wrote: post the backtrace.... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 2010-01-01 at 20:42 -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 01/01/10 20:21, Carlos E. R. wrote:
--*** glibc detected *** jstar: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08145a30 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= post the backtrace....
Ok - it has weird wrapping: - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------*** glibc detected *** jstar: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08145a30 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6[0xb75a550b] /lib/libc.so.6[0xb75a6de4] /lib/libc.s o.6(cfree+0x6d)[0xb75a9fdd] jstar[0x8078883] jstar[0x807957f] jstar[0x805613c] jstar[0x8058da5] jstar[0x8059207] jstar[0x805956d] jst ar[0x8059fb8] jstar[0x805a9b5] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfe)[0xb754eace] jstar[0x804a191] ======= Memory map: ======== 080 48000-080aa000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 108469 /usr/bin/joe 080aa000-080ab000 r--p 00061000 08:05 108469 /usr/bin/joe 080ab00 0-080b8000 rw-p 00062000 08:05 108469 /usr/bin/joe 080b8000-08152000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] b7400000-b7421000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b7421000-b7500000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 b7511000-b752f000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 1441 /lib/libgcc_s. so.1 b752f000-b7530000 r--p 0001d000 08:05 1441 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b7530000-b7531000 rw-p 0001e000 08:05 1441 /lib/l ibgcc_s.so.1 b7531000-b7532000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b7532000-b7535000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 36544 /lib/libdl-2.10.1.so b7535 000-b7536000 r--p 00002000 08:05 36544 /lib/libdl-2.10.1.so b7536000-b7537000 rw-p 00003000 08:05 36544 /lib/libdl-2. 10.1.so b7537000-b7538000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b7538000-b7691000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 36539 /lib/libc-2.10.1.so b7691000-b7 692000 ---p 00159000 08:05 36539 /lib/libc-2.10.1.so b7692000-b7694000 r--p 00159000 08:05 36539 /lib/libc-2.10.1.so b 7694000-b7695000 rw-p 0015b000 08:05 36539 /lib/libc-2.10.1.so b7695000-b7698000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b7698000-b769a000 r - -xp 00000000 08:05 36553 /lib/libutil-2.10.1.so b769a000-b769b000 r--p 00001000 08:05 36553 /lib/libutil-2.10.1.so b76 9b000-b769c000 rw-p 00002000 08:05 36553 /lib/libutil-2.10.1.so b769c000-b76d2000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 1449 /lib/libn curses.so.5.6 b76d2000-b76d3000 ---p 00036000 08:05 1449 /lib/libncurses.so.5.6 b76d3000-b76d5000 r--p 00036000 08:05 1449 /lib/libncurses.so.5.6 b76d5000-b76d9000 rw-p 00038000 08:05 1449 /lib/libncurses.so.5.6 b76d9000-b7700000 r-xp 000 00000 08:05 36552 /lib/libm-2.10.1.so b7700000-b7701000 r--p 00027000 08:05 36552 /lib/libm-2.10.1.so b7701000-b770200 0 rw-p 00028000 08:05 36552 /lib/libm-2.10.1.so b771d000-b771e000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b771e000-b773c000 r-xp 00000000 08 :05 457 /lib/ld-2.10.1.so b773c000-b773d000 r--p 0001d000 08:05 457 /lib/ld-2.10.1.so b773d000-b773e000 rw-p 0001e 000 08:05 457 /lib/ld-2.10.1.so bfe5c000-bfe71000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack] ffffe000-fffff000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso] - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAks+in4ACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VYbwCeLjS6Ng+x3MXCm0v6+pqe5tG/ EnYAnAkMfLHd6NRIpbFcUNiHxTsDRzJW =B0LC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (6)
-
Carlos E. R. -
Carlos E. R. -
Cristian Rodríguez -
Jose Thadeu Pinto Dantas Cavalcante -
Lars Müller -
Philipp Thomas