Because our Intranet doesn't work with Internet Explorer lower then 6, and we certainly not plan to support IE lower then 6, it's no problem for us to adopt an certificate issuer who added themselves in IE only since version 6. 在 2006-09-30六的 10:59 +0800，张韡武写道：

I don't like the way go daddy boast in the news, moving to Windows is more likely a strategic plan to affect stat percentage of Windows being used as web server by including parked domains.

Now our go daddy SSL certificate is expiring (no surprising we choose go daddy the first time: because they made more advertisements), I wish to take this chance to use another certificate issuer. We need cheap Intranet level certificate, from a certificate issuer that is more Linux-friendly. Which certificate issuer Linux admins prefer? For me not necessarily a USA company.

In my case we cannot use CACert.org.

-- 锐业软服（国内业务） http://www.realss.cn Real SoftService http://www.realss.com 销售咨询(Sales Department): 0086 592 20 99987 (Chinese, German, English) 国际业务(International Sales): 0086 10 8460 6011 (German and English) 联系：厦门大学科技园，嘉庚二号楼6楼 邮政：厦门大学2312号信箱（邮编361005）

http://www.registerfly.com/ssl/ Mike ??? wrote:

I don't like the way go daddy boast in the news, moving to Windows is more likely a strategic plan to affect stat percentage of Windows being used as web server by including parked domains.

Now our go daddy SSL certificate is expiring (no surprising we choose go daddy the first time: because they made more advertisements), I wish to take this chance to use another certificate issuer. We need cheap Intranet level certificate, from a certificate issuer that is more Linux-friendly. Which certificate issuer Linux admins prefer? For me not necessarily a USA company.

In my case we cannot use CACert.org.