Hello, I'm seeding now beta6 CDs and made some traffic in the past few days even by limiting the torrent to 1M/s. Here are the average numbers for connections: - PPC: 5 - x86_64: 25 - i386: 50 Of course it varies about +/- 30% all the time, but these are the average numbers. How does it compare to other peoples experiences? i386 over 50%, Opteron about half as much and my favorite PPC is just above 1/20th of all downloads. And a technical question: right now about 80 people share that 1M/s torrent bandwidth. I can't increase the bandwidth. Should I limit the number of connections to serve those who are connected better? Bye, CzP
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:08:24AM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
Hello, I'm seeding now beta6 CDs and made some traffic in the past few days even by limiting the torrent to 1M/s. Here are the average numbers for connections: - PPC: 5 - x86_64: 25 - i386: 50 Of course it varies about +/- 30% all the time, but these are the average numbers. How does it compare to other peoples experiences? i386 over 50%, Opteron about half as much and my favorite PPC is just above 1/20th of all downloads.
As you see what other people see, those are the numbers everybody sees. ;-)
And a technical question: right now about 80 people share that 1M/s torrent bandwidth. I can't increase the bandwidth. Should I limit the number of connections to serve those who are connected better?
Normaly the torrent program takes care of that. The only reason I linit upload is so it does not affect download for me. My upload is 27K (of a maximum of 40K houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
Hello, houghi írta:
As you see what other people see, those are the numbers everybody sees. ;-)
I see only the number of users connected to my server. I don't see, what is the ratio of different architectures on other torrents, or on other ftp sites. On my Hungarian mirror, I see almost exclusively only i386 downloads, but the quickest to start downloads are PPC people :-)
Normaly the torrent program takes care of that. The only reason I linit upload is so it does not affect download for me. My upload is 27K (of a maximum of 40K
It's at a hosting center, but international lines are expensive, connection to the rest of Hungary N x Gigabit. Torrent users come from all over the world, that's why they are limited to 1M. Ftp/http/rsync is only publicized in Hungary, but there quite well. Bye, CzP
houghi
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:25:38PM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
Hello,
houghi írta:
As you see what other people see, those are the numbers everybody sees. ;-)
I see only the number of users connected to my server. I don't see, what is the ratio of different architectures on other torrents, or on other ftp sites. On my Hungarian mirror, I see almost exclusively only i386 downloads, but the quickest to start downloads are PPC people :-)
I thought that torrets where spread in such a way that all use the same data. If each uses a different feeder, then that would mean each mirror has its own group of peers and seeders. That would be bad. At this very moment I have for the i386: Seeds: 0 (82) 54(80) The top 5 IP adresses are at this momenet: 84.56.86.xx 99.9% 68.238.202.xx 97,6% 71.145.144.xx 74.7% 85.250.188.xx 87.9% 209.190.235.xx 86.9% None of them are ones I give up speed to. (The first one is gone) houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
participants (2)
-
houghi
-
Peter Czanik