-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to get SWAT to run, but I'm running into problems. I've made the following configuration changes: I uncommented the line swat 901/tcp in /etc/services /etc/inetd.conf file has swat stream tcp nowait.400 root /usr/sbin/swat swat /etc/xinetd.d/swat: service swat { port = 901 socket_type = stream wait = no user = root server = /usr/sbin/tcpd server_args = /usr/local/samba/bin/swat log_on_failure += USERID disable = no } /etc/pam.d/samba: auth required pam_unix.so account required pam_unix.so I restarted xinetd, started Konq and entered: http://localhost:901 Konq never loads Samba, just sits there spinning its gear ad-infinitem. Obviously, I've missed something. Can someone help?? tia - ---Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/IsMfjeziQOokQnARAqU4AJ43aw2Kh4fyCUABXHfn79Sk1+pBUwCgpBOJ DNxcxNKwnzfmMzQZjvvcDE8= =Xfrx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Michael Satterwhite wrote, On 07/27/2003 02:06 AM:
I restarted xinetd, started Konq and entered:
Konq never loads Samba, just sits there spinning its gear ad-infinitem. Obviously, I've missed something. Can someone help??
I would try http://127.0.0.1:901 to rule out a name resolving problem. -- Joe Morris New Tribes Mission Email Address: Joe_Morris@ntm.org Web Address: http://www.mydestiny.net/~joe_morris Registered Linux user 231871 God said, I AM that I AM. I say, by the grace of God, I am what I am.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 26 July 2003 19:41, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
Michael Satterwhite wrote, On 07/27/2003 02:06 AM:
I restarted xinetd, started Konq and entered:
Konq never loads Samba, just sits there spinning its gear ad-infinitem. Obviously, I've missed something. Can someone help??
I would try http://127.0.0.1:901 to rule out a name resolving problem.
Thanks for the idea. I still have the same problem but it does rule out a possibility - which is a step forward. - ---Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/IyhXjeziQOokQnARAuY0AJ9VwDgdUqghCMcdqE25DPyiW0oTzwCgmC/m 6sIUwVR0Iw0NgHQG9uEm1WE= =dhij -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Michael Satterwhite wrote:
On Saturday 26 July 2003 19:41, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
Michael Satterwhite wrote, On 07/27/2003 02:06 AM:
I restarted xinetd, started Konq and entered:
Konq never loads Samba, just sits there spinning its gear ad-infinitem. Obviously, I've missed something. Can someone help??
I would try http://127.0.0.1:901 to rule out a name resolving problem.
Thanks for the idea. I still have the same problem but it does rule out a possibility - which is a step forward.
---Michael
How about trying "telnet 127.0.0.1 901" (without the quotation marks) to see if the service is actually accepting connections. This will eliminate Konq from the loop completely.
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:06, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to get SWAT to run, but I'm running into problems. I've made the following configuration changes:
I uncommented the line swat 901/tcp in /etc/services
/etc/inetd.conf file has swat stream tcp nowait.400 root /usr/sbin/swat swat
/etc/xinetd.d/swat: service swat { port = 901 socket_type = stream wait = no user = root server = /usr/sbin/tcpd server_args = /usr/local/samba/bin/swat log_on_failure += USERID disable = no }
This all seems mildly schizophrenic, you have inetd pointing to /usr/sbin/swat and you have xinetd pointing at /usr/local/samba/bin/swat. Which is it, and which is running, xinetd or inetd? Or perhaps both?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 26 July 2003 20:25, Anders Johansson wrote:
This all seems mildly schizophrenic, you have inetd pointing to /usr/sbin/swat and you have xinetd pointing at /usr/local/samba/bin/swat. Which is it, and which is running, xinetd or inetd? Or perhaps both?
I was following the instructions on http://www.linuxhelpnetwork.net/tutorials/samba-install.php for the setup, so it's easy to believe that something's wrong. I don't even see inetd in the Runlevel Editor in Yast2, so I would have to say I'm running xinetd. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/I9SDjeziQOokQnARAkSAAJ9+sXmcO8lnbHKsCZnsl9yYKe18+wCfZRAE heNJ4sRdXkdcBTtqVMREpts= =KqrT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 15:32, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
I was following the instructions on http://www.linuxhelpnetwork.net/tutorials/samba-install.php for the setup, so it's easy to believe that something's wrong. I don't even see inetd in the Runlevel Editor in Yast2, so I would have to say I'm running xinetd.
OK, I see you've copied their setup to the letter, so I have to ask: what about the binary? Is it really in /usr/local/samba/bin ? And how about SuSE's original file, /etc/xinetd.d/samba, have you removed/edited that?
participants (4)
-
Anders Johansson -
Joe Morris (NTM) -
Kelly L. Fulks -
Michael Satterwhite