RE: [opensuse] RPM dependency hell: back to the drawing board?
Yes, but things pile up. Packages depend on packages depend on packages etc. Packager has very hard time to get these right. And speaking of Avg. Joe trying to install them..
Anybody else looking forward the maturation of Klik? http://www.opensuse.org/SUPER_KLIK Cheers, Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Hatfield wrote:
Yes, but things pile up. Packages depend on packages depend on packages etc. Packager has very hard time to get these right. And speaking of Avg. Joe trying to install them..
Anybody else looking forward the maturation of Klik? http://www.opensuse.org/SUPER_KLIK
Now Klik has very little to do with this.
Or, rather, Klik definately does *not* solve this, it's the exact opposite.
Klik - at least as of now - requires having such a "base system" consisting of a certain number of
packages, including things like KDE and GNOME.
Actually what we're talking about mostly turns around such a base system.
Klik simply makes the assumption that, as you're using SUSE 10.0, you're having a certain number of
libraries installed. Those are not "packaged" as part of the cmg image.
Which means that if you don't have a certain library installed that Klik assumes you have, the
application simply won't run. Period. It'll die very quickly during runtime linkage.
Klik is great at other things (1-click-install, a single file for an application, use as non-root
user, transportable image, it doesn't install files on your system, etc...).
But this is precisely one of its defects: where to draw the line between what's part of such a "base
system" and what's not.
My point, about this and as a reply to Janne, is that Linux is a highly modular system, and that
it's actually one of it's key benefits. Which means that there is no such thing as a "base system".
Klik excels on so-called "live" distributions that consist of a read-only ISO/CD/DVD, because you
always have the same set of packages installed. There, you actually have a base system, as it
doesn't vary.
cheers
- --
-o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
/\\
On Monday 31 October 2005 01:24, Pascal Bleser wrote:
My point, about this and as a reply to Janne, is that Linux is a highly modular system, and that it's actually one of it's key benefits.
Yep. This is yet another double-edged sword. -- // Janne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Janne Karhunen wrote:
On Monday 31 October 2005 01:24, Pascal Bleser wrote:
My point, about this and as a reply to Janne, is that Linux is a highly modular system, and that it's actually one of it's key benefits.
Yep. This is yet another double-edged sword.
Personally, I wouldn't say it like that but.. yes :)
It has a vast number of advantages and, obviously, some drawbacks ;)
- --
-o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
/\\
participants (3)
-
Daniel Hatfield
-
Janne Karhunen
-
Pascal Bleser