I have versions of pera going back to Win311. But which version should I use for Suse 9.1? CWSIV
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 16:03, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2004 05.03, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
I have versions of pera going back to Win311.
But which version should I use for Suse 9.1?
On Opera's download page, use the one labelled "RedHat 9/Mandrake 9.2/SuSE 8.2"
Be careful with that, you're system might need a shared version ( as mine one does) and then you have to take the RPM for the shared version. -- Greetings from /bill at 169 west , 19 south. Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors."
On Thursday 01 July 2004 05.21, Bill Wisse wrote:
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 16:03, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2004 05.03, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
I have versions of pera going back to Win311.
But which version should I use for Suse 9.1?
On Opera's download page, use the one labelled "RedHat 9/Mandrake 9.2/SuSE 8.2"
Be careful with that, you're system might need a shared version ( as mine one does) and then you have to take the RPM for the shared version.
The one marked "RedHat 9/Mandrake 9.2/SuSE 8.2" is shared The issue is which version of gcc was used to compile it (specifically, which c++ ABI it uses). That version matches the one in 9.1. No need at all for the static version, if that's what you meant
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 16:23, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2004 05.21, Bill Wisse wrote:
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 16:03, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2004 05.03, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
I have versions of pera going back to Win311.
But which version should I use for Suse 9.1?
On Opera's download page, use the one labelled "RedHat 9/Mandrake 9.2/SuSE 8.2"
Be careful with that, you're system might need a shared version ( as mine one does) and then you have to take the RPM for the shared version.
The one marked "RedHat 9/Mandrake 9.2/SuSE 8.2" is shared
The issue is which version of gcc was used to compile it (specifically, which c++ ABI it uses). That version matches the one in 9.1. No need at all for the static version, if that's what you meant
Sorry, I mixed it up. What I meant to say was , the shared version might not work on your system ( as it doesn't on mine) and I 'm using the static version. -- Greetings from /bill at 169 west , 19 south. Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors."
On Thursday 01 July 2004 05.31, Bill Wisse wrote:
Sorry, I mixed it up. What I meant to say was , the shared version might not work on your system ( as it doesn't on mine) and I 'm using the static version.
What is your system, and which shared version(s) did you try?
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 16:37, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2004 05.31, Bill Wisse wrote:
Sorry, I mixed it up. What I meant to say was , the shared version might not work on your system ( as it doesn't on mine) and I 'm using the static version.
What is your system, and which shared version(s) did you try?
Just the normal. SUSE 9.1 with KDE , 512 ram . AAMOF I haven't looked at the shared version for a while now, because every time when I used that I got a segmentation fault and installing the static version solved that. -- Greetings from /bill at 169 west , 19 south. Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors."
* Bill Wisse
Be careful with that, you're system might need a shared version ( as mine one does) and then you have to take the RPM for the shared version.
?? Don't have any idea where you got that. The 'shared' version depends on libraries being on your system. The 'static' version contains *all* the libraries required. The 'static' version *should* work on SuSE 9.1. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos
participants (4)
-
Anders Johansson -
Bill Wisse -
Carl William Spitzer IV -
Patrick Shanahan