Hallo, sorry für die Störung durch diese Mail, aber werdet Ihr etwas schlauer, als ich :-)? Ich bekomme solche Meldungen seit zwei- drei Tagen und ist ziemlich blöd. Ich habe schon an ruediger.michels@inka-net.de (steht im header) eine Nachricht verschickt, hier die Antwort. Was passiert denn da? Tibor ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System ----- From: Mail Delivery System To: tibor-attila.anca@urz.uni-hd.de Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:48 +0100 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - SuSE 9 Professional This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: richie@localhost Connection refused: retry timeout exceeded ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ Return-path: Received: from fwd03.aul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AOwwa-0005TS-00; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:48 +0100 Received: from dsl.privat (bVDD6eZawe2nN4HlCQhrx1IZvrbsH4OdUSi71JkqybTyEN6RDjZEkW@[217.233.126.117]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1AOwwM-0P3vNI0; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:34 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dsl.privat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428581967F for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dsl.privat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172E818F8B for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:17 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-From: X-Envelope-To: X-Delivery-Time: 1069841922 Received: from post.strato.de [192.67.198.2] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for richie@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by mailin.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAQAIgep003142 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAQAIeiv001133 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA20876 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:40 +0100 Received: (qmail 19763 invoked by uid 0); 26 Nov 2003 10:18:39 -0000 Received: from ?217.82.224.73? (HELO susetux.bonn.de) (217.82.224.73) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 10:18:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by susetux.bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA6C1A0F for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by susetux.bonn.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id CAEF81A0B; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:18:36 +0100 From: Anca Tibor- Attila To: ruediger.michels@inka-net.de Subject: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Message-ID: <20031126101836.GC3482@susetux.bonn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: SusE-Linux 9.0 Professional Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - SuSE 9 Professional X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre5 X-Seen: false X-ID: bVDD6eZawe2nN4HlCQhrx1IZvrbsH4OdUSi71JkqybTyEN6RDjZEkW@t-dialin.net Hallo, diese und ähnliche Mails kriege ich nicht zum ersten Mal. Was ist da los auf dem System? Tibor ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System ----- From: Mail Delivery System To: tibor-attila.anca@urz.uni-hd.de Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:32:21 +0100 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - SuSE 9 Professional This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: richie@localhost Connection refused: retry timeout exceeded ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ Return-path: Received: from fwd02.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AOw0B-00076X-01; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:27 +0100 Received: from dsl.privat (SULgZUZLYeiu8gvhylGtVuADvnG-vVxyC5oSxK+v5-iJpEV-xx-PkE@[217.233.126.117]) by fmrl02.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1AOw04-1KgDjM0; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:20 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dsl.privat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1D52C438 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dsl.privat (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC74419148 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:08 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-From: X-Envelope-To: X-Delivery-Time: 1069838508 Received: from post.strato.de [192.67.198.62] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for richie@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:30:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from lists.suse.com (lists.suse.com [195.135.221.131]) by mailin.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hAQ9LmuR001361 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:21:48 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 20430 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2003 09:21:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact suse-linux-help@suse.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: mailto:suse-linux@suse.com List-Help: mailto:suse-linux-help@suse.com List-Unsubscribe: mailto:suse-linux-unsubscribe-ruediger.michels=inka-net.de@suse.com X-MIME-Notice: attachments may have been removed from this message X-Mailinglist: suse-linux X-Message-Number-for-archive: 281100 Delivered-To: mailing list suse-linux@suse.com Received: (qmail 20420 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2003 09:21:45 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:21:38 +0100 From: Anca Tibor- Attila To: SuSE ML Subject: AntiVir oder F-Prot? Message-ID: <20031126092138.GA3482@susetux.bonn.de> Mail-Followup-To: SuSE ML Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: SusE-Linux 9.0 Professional Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - SuSE 9 Professional X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre5 X-Seen: false X-ID: SULgZUZLYeiu8gvhylGtVuADvnG-vVxyC5oSxK+v5-iJpEV-xx-PkE@t-dialin.net Hallo, ich hätte mal eine "Erfahrungsfrage". Ich habe auf meinem Rechner AntiVir Personal und läuft gut. In der nächsten Zeit werde ich wahrscheinlich zu einem Laptop berufen, wo ich sehr wahrscheinlich einen Virenscanner für Mails auch einrichten muss. Nun die Frage, aber bitte keine Webseitenstatistiken, sondern eher eigene Erfahrungen! Wie würdet ihr Antivir und F-Prot beurteilen? Was ist schneller, welches Programm hat bessere Erkennungsraten? AntiVir liefert manchmal täglich mehrere Signaturupdates; wie ist das bei F-Prot? Schon mal vielen Dank, Tibor P.S.: Aspekte, die ich vergessen habe könnt ihr auch gerne einfügen... -- Um die Liste abzubestellen, schicken Sie eine Mail an: suse-linux-unsubscribe@suse.com Um eine Liste aller verfuegbaren Kommandos zu bekommen, schicken Sie eine Mail an: suse-linux-help@suse.com ----- End forwarded message ----- ----- End forwarded message -----