At Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 11:42
Volker Kuhlmann
[when I was critizing Ben Rosenberg] Can you take your personal problems offlist please? Thanks. Volker
And can you post under an address where personal responses are possible, Mr. Hidden Paradise? These are not my personal problems alone. The list is overflowing with request from people who are too lazy to look first for themselves. In the beginning of email-list and newsgroups it was very common to receiving some RTFM responses and IMO that did good and helped us to get the self-training through reading available material FIRST before posting. But nowadays our conditioned "politeness" tells us to answer everything and thus train lazy dogs to become even more lazy. Now even totally appropriate "have you *tried* google" criticism is criticized. As you do, as Ben did. And it was a complete google-link to click on plus the remark that the forth item will contain the wanted material - and I checked it, the 4th google reference is indead very valuable regarding the original question. 'Please' and 'thanks' are cheap to type into a keyboard. Learning is not that cheap. But of course somebody will certainly identify with poor lazy Ben if he is himself asking questions like "Is anyone able/willing to give a brief opinion about the level of security of bind 8 and 9? There must be a reason why SuSE ships both. If they're equally secure it would seem to be more sensible to go with the new version for new servers?" Was there anyone willing to give a <whatever>, Volker? Perhaps offlist to your "undeliverable" mail-box? Man, you made it... Michael -- Michael Zimmermann (http://vegaa.de)
Me?! Lazy?! Sir do you know how long I've been on the SuSE Linux English list and the 1000's of questions I've answered?! Are you simple out of your mind or speaking out of ignorance of what the hell is going on? I certainly don't need this list and attitudes such as yours. I think I'll un-subscribe. I'll just stick with RFC's, SuSE announce and other outlets of information. I do know how to RTFM and find my own answers. And if I really truly get stuck then I'll fire off an email to Mads, CKM or Roman since I know them from my time working at SuSE. It's not nice to be so rude and arrogant. If someone with your attitude came looking for a job at my company I wouldn't hire you. God knows what you would be like to work with. The reason we have so many problems with computer security in this world isn't Microsoft. It's people like you who don't teach and correct bad behavior. Your attitude is another reason that people get scared to ask questions when they adopt Linux or UNIX solutions and often times get them wrong. Please do not make an example of me as far as being to lazy to figure out my software issues. Because you don't know me from one simple line written at 1am condemning arrogant behavior. To quote: "*sheeesh*" Go have a beer and chill out...or are you not old enough to drink? * Michael Zimmermann (zim@vegaa.de) [021008 07:25]: :: ::But of course somebody will certainly identify with poor ::lazy Ben if he is himself asking questions like :: ::"Is anyone able/willing to give a brief opinion about the level of ::security of bind 8 and 9? There must be a reason why SuSE ships both. ::If they're equally secure it would seem to be more sensible to go with ::the new version for new servers?" :: ::Was there anyone willing to give a <whatever>, Volker? ::Perhaps offlist to your "undeliverable" mail-box? -- Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@whack.org Tell me what you believe.. I tell you what you should see.
Guys,
this list is here for discussion, for asking questions and seeing the
answers right away. It used to be a precious place for me to share
thoughts and exchange new ideas (all of you have seen something you didn't
know before you read it on this list) long before I came to SuSE.
Today, it helps me and the others in the team to get hold of what admins
in the world are busy with (mostly the questions). You see each of the
SuSE Security team members replying to one or the other thread every once
in a while. suse-security@suse.com is one of the means of communication
that are rarely found with other operating systems: Direct contact with
the paranoia professionals at SuSE (even though we can't always follow the
list) and honest exchange of information. I like it this way, and I would
like it to remain as it is right now. I appreciate the contributions made,
especially from now missing ex-collegues.
There have been lists that didn't even survive the first 200 subscribers.
suse-security now has more than 4400 subscribers, thanks to the discipline
of the people who post and the devotement to security of all in the forum.
It is vital for this list that questions can be asked. Of course, these
questions should be related to security to comply with the purpose of this
list. Desired language is English. If you are not willing to answer to one
of the questions, and if you do not have anything else to say that
contributes to the threads or the purpose of the list in general, then
there is a good reason _NOT_ to post to the list. We haven't had any
flamewars for ages - it looks like we didn't need them.
Your choice.
Thanks,
Roman.
--
- -
| Roman Drahtmüller
Hi, I think Tobias message was not rude, it helped the original poster to solve his configuration issues and maybe more. I think the "Search Googel for <Expression>" answer is adequate. Short but adequate. (Actually I think most of todays support request should sound like "Please give me the appropriate Google search string for following problem: ...".) I think Bens message was not offending. Maybe OT (like this and other messages too), but not offending. (Actually we are adults and life is not a girlschool.) So probably the participating parties will exchange "Sorry, I did not mean it that way" messages off list, and we all continue to help and support each other. I want to take the opportunity to thank everyone who helped me in the past, mike
Guys and gals (yes there are female admins), Perhaps the best way to handle people that don't like the questions asked by newbies (and we were all newbies at one time) is to cancel the subscription of those who flame newbies. Sometimes the simple answer is not so simple to someone new to unix/linux and that person needs to be politely pointed into the right direction. On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 13:37, Roman Drahtmueller wrote: snip.
Guys,
this list is here for discussion, for asking questions and seeing the answers right away. It used to be a precious place for me to share thoughts and exchange new ideas (all of you have seen something you didn't know before you read it on this list) long before I came to SuSE.
It is vital for this list that questions can be asked. Of course, these questions should be related to security to comply with the purpose of this list. Desired language is English. If you are not willing to answer to one of the questions, and if you do not have anything else to say that contributes to the threads or the purpose of the list in general, then there is a good reason _NOT_ to post to the list. We haven't had any flamewars for ages - it looks like we didn't need them.
Your choice.
Thanks, Roman.
At Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 20:06 Ken Schneider wrote:
Perhaps the best way to handle people that don't like the questions asked by newbies (and we were all newbies at one time) is to cancel the subscription of those who flame newbies.
In this case it was the newbie who flamed. He called the answerer "rude bastard" 'cause he was pointed to an answer from google and it was questioned that he had tried google at all. Now cancel my subscription 'cause I'm against newbies? -- Michael Zimmermann (http://vegaa.de)
Michael Zimmermann wrote:
At Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 20:06 Ken Schneider wrote:
Perhaps the best way to handle people that don't like the questions asked by newbies (and we were all newbies at one time) is to cancel the subscription of those who flame newbies.
In this case it was the newbie who flamed. He called the answerer "rude bastard" 'cause he was pointed to an answer from google and it was questioned that he had tried google at all.
i think here we have our problem: Ben WASN'T the 'newbie' who flamed, the 'newbie' (sorry, i don't want to call you newbe...) in that case was bjoern ramann who asked. Someone replied and Ben said 'rude bastard'. The only one who CAN be pissed is Tobias Reckhard, but i don't think that he'll be. Ben tried answered correctly the question first. but we should stop here by now. Leaving the list cause someone had a bad day isn't the way i think. This list is, like Roman said, a very good list with a mix of professionals, newbies and 'normal users', and i would like not to see such postings again here, we're old enough to handle such things privat if we think we have something to handle, otherwise just ignore a mail or put a person in you whatever filter... thats a kind of respect imho. So long
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 10:22, Michael Zimmermann wrote:
At Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 11:42
Volker Kuhlmann
wrote: [when I was critizing Ben Rosenberg] Can you take your personal problems offlist please? Thanks. Volker
And can you post under an address where personal responses are possible, Mr. Hidden Paradise? <snip>
Michael, man you made it... ***Begin Cut*** Greetings from Amazon.com. You have successfully cancelled your order #104-1399xxx-xxxxxxxx For your reference, here is a summary of your order: Order #104-1399xxx-xxxxxxx - placed September 26, 2002 at 03:12 PM PDT Status: CANCELLED - on October 08, 2002 _____________________________________________________________________ 1 copy of "SuSE Linux 8.1 Professional" ; CD-ROM; @ $79.99 _____________________________________________________________________ ***End cut*** Ben is spot on and it's no wonder newbies like me are afraid to ask questions. Just within the past 2 weeks a lady, Susan, received the same treatment,as Ben, from this group and she has never posted again. So I join her . . . this will be my first, only / last posting to this group and I have elected to vote with my wallet. -- Best Regards, Ed Sent via SuSE Linux 7.3 Pro, Kernel 2.4.16
participants (7)
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
Edward Beatty
-
Ken Schneider
-
Michael Zimmermann
-
Roman Drahtmueller
-
Sven 'Darkman' Michels
-
Thomas Michael Wanka