WuFTPD is a piece of crap.
Hahahaha! Amen to that! There was a post on Bugtraq a couple of days ago that summed up wu-ftp. "WU-FTP Providing *remote* root since 1994!" I couldn't stop laughing. It was so funny because it is so true. M
Hi, try to use our wuftpd 2.4 version. It's audited and __should__ be secure. On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Mr. M wrote:
WuFTPD is a piece of crap.
Hahahaha! Amen to that!
There was a post on Bugtraq a couple of days ago that summed up wu-ftp.
"WU-FTP Providing *remote* root since 1994!"
I couldn't stop laughing. It was so funny because it is so true.
M
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com
Bye, Thomas -- Thomas Biege, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaeckerstr. 10, 90443 Nuernberg E@mail: thomas@suse.de Function: Security Support & Auditing "lynx -source http://www.suse.de/~thomas/thomas.pgp | pgp -fka" Key fingerprint = 09 48 F2 FD 81 F7 E7 98 6D C7 36 F1 96 6A 12 47
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, H. Engelmann wrote:
Thomas Biege wrote:
Hi, try to use our wuftpd 2.4 version. It's audited and __should__ be secure.
What does this mean:
It's audited <cut>
Audits are tests, in this case a test on the wuftp 2.4.2 code. Greetz, Siert
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, H. Engelmann wrote:
Thomas Biege wrote:
Hi, try to use our wuftpd 2.4 version. It's audited and __should__ be secure.
What does this mean:
It's audited
regards
It means I reviewed the source, trying to spot every security hole and fixed it. Bye, Thomas -- Thomas Biege, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaeckerstr. 10, 90443 Nuernberg E@mail: thomas@suse.de Function: Security Support & Auditing "lynx -source http://www.suse.de/~thomas/thomas.pgp | pgp -fka" Key fingerprint = 09 48 F2 FD 81 F7 E7 98 6D C7 36 F1 96 6A 12 47
participants (4)
-
H. Engelmann -
Mr. M -
S.G. Zijl -
Thomas Biege