-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! There are several exploits in the described packages, but why aren't there any packages for YOU or am I too fast with my conclusion? The normal way was to write an announcement and then provide the patch-rpm's via YOU or is there a slightly change after novell is in the business? Reguards Philippe - -- Diese Nachricht ist digital signiert und enthält weder Siegel noch Unterschrift! Die unaufgeforderte Zusendung einer Werbemail an Privatleute verstößt gegen §1 UWG und 823 I BGB (Beschluß des LG Berlin vom 2.8.1998 Az: 16 O 201/98). Jede kommerzielle Nutzung der übermittelten persönlichen Daten sowie deren Weitergabe an Dritte ist ausdrücklich untersagt! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQD1AwUBQkMbk0Ng1DRVIGjBAQLn5gb9HQfh2+GLGUZk2UIzvsgwIAtSJL76hyVe Sf4PgbkDh3xnT3jfahoQnM4jtna5xemfFil1hl3VUu16MF8+Dd0Z7LFJ/LMREmJq S2QQjnT02XsiGcA2+QrZQfKkE5DlDG6jk+FH9jsZ3lPk6dnt+WGfs+PzNUMDhISz qiYJRmD3KaE35nAsDIoxe2XddsmGP6eXN/WM9ylHYQtaZj9Xw1xoYFq1ZrEA/Jqh hcXCh7Rvxxa2MPK9UGNgJcyeVNBxjxm6dmjB4gUsNC46wNypDjayNIPP4JkcllmX Ele8wfMRqxQ= =94g2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:57:08PM +0100, Philippe Vogel wrote:
Hi!
There are several exploits in the described packages, but why aren't there any packages for YOU or am I too fast with my conclusion?
The normal way was to write an announcement and then provide the patch-rpm's via YOU or is there a slightly change after novell is in the business?
The mirrors should be syncing currently. I wrote the advisories right after approving the updates. Ciao, Marcus
Hello, Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2005 21:57 schrieb Marcus Meissner: [...]
I wrote the advisories right after approving the updates.
Good keyword ;-) I was used to see the security announcements via suse-security-announce, but also here. This was also a type of RAIM [1] ;-) Since some weeks, I receive the announcements via suse-security-announce only. Did you just forget to send the announces to suse-security also or is this a intentional change? Regards, Christian Boltz [1] Redundant Array of Independent Mailboxes ;-) -- "Anybody who really thinks /bin/true should report a version number and a help string (or even a copyright notice) needs to get his head examined." [Linus Torvalds]
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:42:30AM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2005 21:57 schrieb Marcus Meissner: [...]
I wrote the advisories right after approving the updates.
Good keyword ;-)
I was used to see the security announcements via suse-security-announce, but also here. This was also a type of RAIM [1] ;-)
Since some weeks, I receive the announcements via suse-security-announce only. Did you just forget to send the announces to suse-security also or is this a intentional change?
I checked this and the mailinglist handler did bounce several of the last advisories due to having a more stricter to: check. We will pick up posting the more critical ones to this list again. My Security Summary Reports only did go to suse-security-announce. Basically I would really suggest to subscribe to suse-security-announce if you want to get the advisories. Ciao, Marcus
participants (3)
-
Christian Boltz
-
Marcus Meissner
-
Philippe Vogel