Re: [suse-security] Waiting for device /dev/900 to appear
...you mean "experimental on 2.6.x kernel" OK, but switching back is not as easy (for me) as ist sounds ( firewall etc) anyway...... i NEVER put a root on a RAID. I reinstalled the same box, just leaving / on a normal partition (ext3) and all works fine..... and hoping the harddisk wont fail until my backup is done ! ...a frustrated Linux User !
Raid is kind a experimental on 2.4.x kernels, better chose 2.4.x kernel.
Uninstall kernel 2.6.x, then install kernel 2.4.x (x means latest one). Then start lilo or change settings within grub.
Afterwards reboot - not before the installation of kernel 2.4.x (otherwise you cannot load any kernelmodules and that would be not funny)!!!
Philippe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Werner Penz"
To: Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 5:21 PM Subject: [suse-security] Waiting for device /dev/900 to appear OK, id did a complete new installation (same box) with the same disk-configuration:
/dev/hda2 + /dev/hdb2 als raid1: /dev/md0 = / #root (ext3) /dev/hda1 = /boot
from original CD SuSe 91prof. minimal System installed.
all works fine until i upgrade the kernel 2.6.4 to 2.6.5 from the ftp.suse.com with YOU.
The boot aborts with:
raidautorun ... waiting for device /dev/900 to appear ...(short delay ) .... not found....
RAIDs never saved me from a "dilemma", for me, the always created one !
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com Security-related bug reports go to security@suse.de, not here
On Thursday 01 July 2004 11:40, Werner Penz wrote:
...you mean "experimental on 2.6.x kernel" OK, but switching back is not as easy (for me) as ist sounds ( firewall etc) anyway...... i NEVER put a root on a RAID. I reinstalled the same box, just leaving / on a normal partition (ext3) and all works fine..... and hoping the harddisk wont fail until my backup is done ! ...a frustrated Linux User !
First of all, your problem is not security related at all, so you simply bark at the wrong tree.. Additionally, your problem description misses any very basic information, such as fdisk -l and cat /proc/mdstat, so you can't even expect helpful hints. I do regulary SW RAID, but never encountered such a problem, more the other way around, 2.6.5-7.75 is the first official SuSE kernel, which allows for SW RAID on a couple of formerly dysfunctional systems.. Cheers, Pete
participants (2)
-
Hans-Peter Jansen
-
Werner Penz