On 12/10/2012 06:20 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:

...

Hi,

Since there is no documentation regarding creating branding packages, this has been a painful experience :( By reading other branding packages I eventualy created a package however looks like I hit a bug in the branding check of rpmlint. Here is what I get

" RPMLINT report: =============== awesome-branding-openSUSE.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro Provides awesome-branding = %{version} %{version}

This package contains a file whose path contains something that looks like an unexpanded macro; this is often the sign of a misspelling. Please check your specfile. "

but I have "Provides: awesome-branding = %{version}" . If I remove the %version from the provides line I do not see this warning but it seems logical to have the %version.

Is this a bug that I can live with or am I missing something. You can find the spec file of the package in https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=awesome-branding-openSUSE&project=home%3Atoganm%3Atesting

Any help is appreciated as I need this package before I can submit the awesome package with upstream branding to factory

Try moving the Provides: line _after_ the Version: line, order might be important.

Ok that did the trick. Thanks for the tip. Togan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org