[opensuse-packaging] Suggested package updates
Hi.
Suggested package updates:
Name Current New Repos
----------------------------------------------------------
python-qt4 4.3 4.3.3 standard, devel:languages:python
python-sip 4.7 4.7.3 standard, devel:languages:python
eric 4.0.1 4.0.3 standard
gajim 0.11.1 0.11.4 server:messaging
gpsd 2.34 2.35 Application:Geo
lyx 1.5.1 1.5.2 standard, KDE:Backports
ntfsprogs 1.13 2.0.0 standard, filesystems
BTW:
Which mailing list is best for reporting outdated packages?
Where can I know why some packages are in more than one repo?
Why standard repo is so poor and I have to use gazillion of BS repos?
--
Krzysztof Kotlenga
Hi,
On 12/13/2007 at 2:51 PM, Krzysztof Kotlenga
wrote: BTW: Which mailing list is best for reporting outdated packages? Where can I know why some packages are in more than one repo? Why standard repo is so poor and I have to use gazillion of BS repos?
I assume as 'standard' you mean the repository of the released product? This is frozen and will never ever move. It is a released product and this repository is never gonna change. All updates have to come from either a BS repository or from the openSUSE-update channel (but even there: there is hardly ever a version upgrade; only security fixes). Dominique -- Sorry for the disclaimer TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 77 offices in 60 countries and over 2,500 professionals (2007). TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our unique network and our services and visit our website at www.tmf-group.com. The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the original e-mail communication. TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in its receipt. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
"Dominique Leuenberger"
I assume as 'standard' you mean the repository of the released product?
Yes. "Main Repository (OSS)"
All updates have to come from either a BS repository or from the openSUSE-update channel (but even there: there is hardly ever a version upgrade; only security fixes).
Thanks for the explanation. You confirmed what I've already noticed -
update repository is "stable to death", so user have to track many BS
repos to get fairly up to date system. Maybe I'm spoiled by other
distros where update repositories use to get real updates (which often
happens to be really important). But OK, I can live with that... :-)
--
Krzysztof Kotlenga
Krzysztof Kotlenga wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. You confirmed what I've already noticed - update repository is "stable to death", so user have to track many BS repos to get fairly up to date system.
You can install & track Factory instead. Michal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On 12/13/2007 at 3:35 PM, Krzysztof Kotlenga
wrote: All updates have to come from either a BS repository or from the openSUSE-update channel (but even there: there is hardly ever a version upgrade; only security fixes). Thanks for the explanation. You confirmed what I've already noticed - update repository is "stable to death", so user have to track many BS repos to get fairly up to date system. Maybe I'm spoiled by other distros where update repositories use to get real updates (which often happens to be really important). But OK, I can live with that... :-)
That's at least a decision the user can go for himself; a newer version does not always mean less problems. But if you want to be on the bleeding edge, Factory is the right one ;) but there you should be aware: you get all the nice and new naughty things: be prepared to not have the system usable once in a while. Dominique -- TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 77 offices in 60 countries and over 2,500 professionals (2007). TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our unique network and our services and visit our website at www.tmf-group.com. The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the original e-mail communication. TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in its receipt. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
"Dominique Leuenberger"
That's at least a decision the user can go for himself; a newer version does not always mean less problems. But if you want to be on the bleeding edge, Factory is the right one ;) but there you should be aware: you get all the nice and new naughty things: be prepared to not have the system usable once in a while.
I agree. For now I'll stick with 10.3 + some nice BS repos like xorg73
or KDE:Backports, as I believe it's some kind of middle between
"stable" and bleeding edge.
About main/standard/oss repo being poor - I mean, there are not many
packages. People I convinced to openSUSE look at me angrily when I say
"Well, you have to add this BS repo to install blah blah because it's
not included in main". Why is that?
Do packages from BS finally find their way into main distribution? Or
maybe only some of them? If yes, who decides which packages are more
important than the others? AFAIK, main repository is maintained only by
SUSE/Novell employees?
--
Krzysztof Kotlenga
On Thursday 13 December 2007 15:17:23 wrote Krzysztof Kotlenga:
"Dominique Leuenberger"
wrote: That's at least a decision the user can go for himself; a newer version does not always mean less problems. But if you want to be on the bleeding edge, Factory is the right one ;) but there you should be aware: you get all the nice and new naughty things: be prepared to not have the system usable once in a while.
I agree. For now I'll stick with 10.3 + some nice BS repos like xorg73 or KDE:Backports, as I believe it's some kind of middle between "stable" and bleeding edge.
About main/standard/oss repo being poor - I mean, there are not many packages. People I convinced to openSUSE look at me angrily when I say "Well, you have to add this BS repo to install blah blah because it's not included in main". Why is that?
The main repo has higher limits regarding the code. These packages need a review by the packager and support for two years. This can't be done easily. In the past this was really a pity, because adding further repos was hard. But I think this became much better with 10.3, with the 1-click installation caring about that and the additional recommended community repos.
Do packages from BS finally find their way into main distribution? Or maybe only some of them? If yes, who decides which packages are more important than the others? AFAIK, main repository is maintained only by SUSE/Novell employees?
Only packages submitted to openSUSE:Factory does this. We work in the next month on a mechanism allowing to push updates to any other project (including openSUSE:Factory). But decision what will be included in openSUSE main distro is up to the release master (Stephan Kulow). bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) email: adrian@suse.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On 12/13/2007 at 4:17 PM, Krzysztof Kotlenga
wrote: About main/standard/oss repo being poor - I mean, there are not many packages. People I convinced to openSUSE look at me angrily when I say "Well, you have to add this BS repo to install blah blah because it's not included in main". Why is that? Do packages from BS finally find their way into main distribution? Or maybe only some of them? If yes, who decides which packages are more important than the others? AFAIK, main repository is maintained only by SUSE/Novell employees?
The difference lies in the support you can request. If the error is in one of the base packages (OSS repo), Novell as a company is very devoted to fix those errors. They are part of the base distribution against which you can report bugs. The larger the base of packages for the base distribution, the more bugs will be reported and it is almost impossible to rank them in a timly wise manner. All patches coming from the Update repo have to undergo several testings. Whereas in the BS, most packagers go the way: - There is a fresh release of Product XY, they package it and that's it. If there is a bug, well, report it to the author of the product. I think only very few of the packagers actually patch errors out; most patches will go against the installation / configure / Makefile of a product (am I right, packagers?) So just increasing the base will not do to good to the quality, or at least you will only be able to get a patch once a new version is officially released from a certain project. As you said: it's about deciding on what side you want to be: bleeding edge or stable... and you can freely put you in the middle. Dominique -- TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 77 offices in 60 countries and over 2,500 professionals (2007). TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our unique network and our services and visit our website at www.tmf-group.com. The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the original e-mail communication. TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in its receipt. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
participants (4)
-
Adrian Schröter
-
Dominique Leuenberger
-
Krzysztof Kotlenga
-
Michal Marek