On 25.09.2012 15:31, Vincent Untz wrote:

Le mardi 25 septembre 2012, à 15:02 +0200, Guido Berhoerster a écrit :

...

* Andreas Jaeger [2012-09-25 14:48]:

...

FYI,

a colleague of mine just did these changes: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I think one of our oldest scripts in our SuSE Linux/SUSE Linux/openSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise history is now finally gone: /sbin/SuSEconfig

R.I.P.

https://fate.suse.com/100011 https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/135139 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I think we have fixed all the packages that used SuSEconfig and will blacklist it now in rpmlint,

It will certainly break SuSEconfig.glib2. Also why was this change even made, AFAICS this has not been discussed with the stakeholders and the rationale and discussion in FATE is non-public.

I guess we can move what SuSEconfig.glib2 is doing to the %desktop_database_post/%desktop_database_postun macros -- and hopefully there will be interest upstream in the work Stanislav has been doing to properly deal with this.

What would be good if we can transfer these macros to the way it was done for %fonts_scriplets. This way you can easily move things into %posttrans once zypper supports it properly. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org

* Vincent Untz [2012-09-25 15:32]:

Le mardi 25 septembre 2012, à 15:02 +0200, Guido Berhoerster a écrit :

...

* Andreas Jaeger [2012-09-25 14:48]:

...

FYI,

a colleague of mine just did these changes: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I think one of our oldest scripts in our SuSE Linux/SUSE Linux/openSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise history is now finally gone: /sbin/SuSEconfig

R.I.P.

https://fate.suse.com/100011 https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/135139 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I think we have fixed all the packages that used SuSEconfig and will blacklist it now in rpmlint,

It will certainly break SuSEconfig.glib2. Also why was this change even made, AFAICS this has not been discussed with the stakeholders and the rationale and discussion in FATE is non-public.

I guess we can move what SuSEconfig.glib2 is doing to the %desktop_database_post/%desktop_database_postun macros -- and hopefully there will be interest upstream in the work Stanislav has been doing to properly deal with this.

Those macros are often not used by applications outside GNOME:* or X11:xfce, most notably the KDE packages don't seem to use that at all. Also what exact fix are you planning, integrate the *-defaults.list generation into desktop-file-utils? -- Guido Berhoerster -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org

On Saturday 2012-09-29 14:05, Juan Erbes wrote:

2012/9/25 Andreas Jaeger :

...

FYI,

a colleague of mine just did these changes: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I think one of our oldest scripts in our SuSE Linux/SUSE Linux/openSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise history is now finally gone: /sbin/SuSEconfig

I have a problem with Opensuse 12.2. I installed the Catalyst driver for my ATI video card, and any time I made a update of the system which replaces a Mesa or Xorg package, the fglrx do'nt works right and I must reinstall it

Well fathom this: ATI/NVIDIA manual installers overwrite Mesa (idiotic!) *, so it's only natural that on Mesa update, Mesa is restored. * fixable. If only they knew about /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org