[opensuse-kernel] How do you adjust or generate the series.conf for linux kernel v3.0.1 so it can compile.
Hello How do you adjust or generate the series.conf for linux kernel v3.0.1 so it can compile. project is located at -- https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kernel-default&project=home%3Adoiggl So far this this patch has failed in series.conf *** patch ../patches.fixes/SCSI-fix-crash-in-scsi_dispatch_cmd.patch failed *** Thanks Glenn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org
On 08/07/2011 04:36 AM, doiggl@velocitynet.com.au wrote:
Hello How do you adjust or generate the series.conf for linux kernel v3.0.1 so it can compile.
We look what patches are contained in the stable release and prune them from the series.conf. Then we apply all the remaining patches from series.conf and fix the conflicts which might appear.
project is located at -- https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kernel-default&project=home%3Adoiggl
So far this this patch has failed in series.conf *** patch ../patches.fixes/SCSI-fix-crash-in-scsi_dispatch_cmd.patch failed *** Thanks Glenn
Why do you bother anyway? Kernel:stable already has 3.0.1 in. -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday, August 07, 2011 18:46:00 Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 08/07/2011 04:36 AM, doiggl@velocitynet.com.au wrote:
Hello How do you adjust or generate the series.conf for linux kernel v3.0.1 so it can compile.
We look what patches are contained in the stable release and prune them from the series.conf. Then we apply all the remaining patches from series.conf and fix the conflicts which might appear.
project is located at -- https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kernel-default&project=ho me%3Adoiggl
So far this this patch has failed in series.conf *** patch ../patches.fixes/SCSI-fix-crash-in-scsi_dispatch_cmd.patch failed *** Thanks Glenn
Why do you bother anyway? Kernel:stable already has 3.0.1 in.
Mmh, but Kernel:HEAD does not have it - and openSUSE:Factory is still at 3.0, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org
On 08/09/2011 10:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Sunday, August 07, 2011 18:46:00 Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 08/07/2011 04:36 AM, doiggl@velocitynet.com.au wrote:
Hello How do you adjust or generate the series.conf for linux kernel v3.0.1 so it can compile.
We look what patches are contained in the stable release and prune them from the series.conf. Then we apply all the remaining patches from series.conf and fix the conflicts which might appear.
project is located at -- https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kernel-default&project=ho me%3Adoiggl
So far this this patch has failed in series.conf *** patch ../patches.fixes/SCSI-fix-crash-in-scsi_dispatch_cmd.patch failed *** Thanks Glenn
Why do you bother anyway? Kernel:stable already has 3.0.1 in.
Mmh, but Kernel:HEAD does not have it - and openSUSE:Factory is still at 3.0,
Yes, when I last asked if I should push stable trees into HEAD, I got no reply, so I'm not doing that. Hence HEAD/factory is now supposed to contain only "non-stable" releases and -rcs. In any case, he branched from kernel:stable. And kernel:stable receives stable updates as early as possible. So there is not much sense to do that work in home projects... thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org
On 9.8.2011 11:17, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 08/09/2011 10:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Sunday, August 07, 2011 18:46:00 Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 08/07/2011 04:36 AM, doiggl@velocitynet.com.au wrote:
Hello How do you adjust or generate the series.conf for linux kernel v3.0.1 so it can compile.
We look what patches are contained in the stable release and prune them from the series.conf. Then we apply all the remaining patches from series.conf and fix the conflicts which might appear.
project is located at -- https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kernel-default&project=ho me%3Adoiggl
So far this this patch has failed in series.conf *** patch ../patches.fixes/SCSI-fix-crash-in-scsi_dispatch_cmd.patch failed *** Thanks Glenn
Why do you bother anyway? Kernel:stable already has 3.0.1 in.
Mmh, but Kernel:HEAD does not have it - and openSUSE:Factory is still at 3.0,
Yes, when I last asked if I should push stable trees into HEAD, I got no reply, so I'm not doing that. Hence HEAD/factory is now supposed to contain only "non-stable" releases and -rcs.
Jeff usually skips -rc1 in master, to avoid too much breakage (those who wish to test -rc1s can use the vanilla branch). So it IMO would not hurt to track the latest stable tree if there is no -rc2 yet. So that the Factory kernel shows some progress :-). But it's only my opinion. Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:20:24 Michal Marek wrote:
On 9.8.2011 11:17, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 08/09/2011 10:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Sunday, August 07, 2011 18:46:00 Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 08/07/2011 04:36 AM, doiggl@velocitynet.com.au wrote:
Hello How do you adjust or generate the series.conf for linux kernel v3.0.1 so it can compile.
We look what patches are contained in the stable release and prune them from the series.conf. Then we apply all the remaining patches from series.conf and fix the conflicts which might appear.
project is located at -- https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kernel-default&project =ho me%3Adoiggl
So far this this patch has failed in series.conf *** patch ../patches.fixes/SCSI-fix-crash-in-scsi_dispatch_cmd.patch failed *** Thanks Glenn
Why do you bother anyway? Kernel:stable already has 3.0.1 in.
Mmh, but Kernel:HEAD does not have it - and openSUSE:Factory is still at 3.0,
Yes, when I last asked if I should push stable trees into HEAD, I got no reply, so I'm not doing that. Hence HEAD/factory is now supposed to contain only "non-stable" releases and -rcs.
Jeff usually skips -rc1 in master, to avoid too much breakage (those who wish to test -rc1s can use the vanilla branch). So it IMO would not hurt to track the latest stable tree if there is no -rc2 yet. So that the Factory kernel shows some progress :-). But it's only my opinion.
Or submit from stable to Factory... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org
On 9.8.2011 12:53, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:20:24 Michal Marek wrote:
Jeff usually skips -rc1 in master, to avoid too much breakage (those who wish to test -rc1s can use the vanilla branch). So it IMO would not hurt to track the latest stable tree if there is no -rc2 yet. So that the Factory kernel shows some progress :-). But it's only my opinion.
Or submit from stable to Factory...
This got automatically declined by some script: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/78364 Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 13:48:34 Michal Marek wrote:
On 9.8.2011 12:53, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:20:24 Michal Marek wrote:
Jeff usually skips -rc1 in master, to avoid too much breakage (those who wish to test -rc1s can use the vanilla branch). So it IMO would not hurt to track the latest stable tree if there is no -rc2 yet. So that the Factory kernel shows some progress :-). But it's only my opinion.
Or submit from stable to Factory...
This got automatically declined by some script: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/78364
Indeed - since it's not the devel project ;-( Sorry, let me check with the check-in team, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org
participants (4)
-
Andreas Jaeger -
doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au -
Jiri Slaby -
Michal Marek