[opensuse-kde] chromium-desktop-kde-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 does not show images
An update to chromium-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 resulted in a program missing all images. A re-install with chromium-22.0.1190.0-1.5.3.i586 repaired the issue. Somebody else with the same effects? Worth a bug report? chromium-desktop-kde-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 -- Linux User 183145 using KDE4 on a Pentium IV , powered by openSUSE 12.3 Milestone 0 (i586) Kernel: 3.5.0-1-desktop KDE Development Platform: 4.8.5 (4.8.5)) 14:53pm up 1:26, 4 users, load average: 0.51, 0.52, 0.61 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On 08/17/2012 09:58 AM, C. Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
An update to chromium-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 resulted in a program missing all images. A re-install with chromium-22.0.1190.0-1.5.3.i586 repaired the issue.
Somebody else with the same effects? Worth a bug report?
chromium-desktop-kde-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586
Try to see if reinstalling libjpeg8 fixes this (I am assuming you are running Factory). Regards. -- Ismail Dönmez - openSUSE Team SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:05:55 AM Ismail Doenmez wrote:
On 08/17/2012 09:58 AM, C. Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
An update to chromium-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 resulted in a program missing all images. A re-install with chromium-22.0.1190.0-1.5.3.i586 repaired the issue.
Somebody else with the same effects? Worth a bug report?
chromium-desktop-kde-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586
Try to see if reinstalling libjpeg8 fixes this (I am assuming you are running Factory).
Sorry, but a reinstall of libjpeg8 did not help. Any other suggestion? -- Linux User 183145 using KDE4 on a Pentium IV , powered by openSUSE 12.3 Milestone 0 (i586) Kernel: 3.5.0-1-desktop KDE Development Platform: 4.8.5 (4.8.5)) 19:52pm up 0:17, 4 users, load average: 1.99, 3.62, 3.24 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Friday 17 Aug 2012 19:54:04 C. Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:05:55 AM Ismail Doenmez wrote:
On 08/17/2012 09:58 AM, C. Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
An update to chromium-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 resulted in a program missing all images. A re-install with chromium-22.0.1190.0-1.5.3.i586 repaired the issue.
Somebody else with the same effects? Worth a bug report?
chromium-desktop-kde-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586
Try to see if reinstalling libjpeg8 fixes this (I am assuming you are running Factory).
Sorry, but a reinstall of libjpeg8 did not help. Any other suggestion?
I notice from your email sig, you are using factory... there was some broken dependencies between chromium and libjpeg in factory for whatever reason. Is there a reason you need to use Factory instead of 12.2? Factory is liable to break anything at this time... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 08:19:56 AM Graham Anderson wrote:
On Friday 17 Aug 2012 19:54:04 C. Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:05:55 AM Ismail Doenmez wrote:
On 08/17/2012 09:58 AM, C. Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
An update to chromium-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 resulted in a program missing all images. A re-install with chromium-22.0.1190.0-1.5.3.i586 repaired the issue.
Somebody else with the same effects? Worth a bug report?
chromium-desktop-kde-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586
Try to see if reinstalling libjpeg8 fixes this (I am assuming you are running Factory).
Sorry, but a reinstall of libjpeg8 did not help. Any other suggestion?
I notice from your email sig, you are using factory... there was some broken dependencies between chromium and libjpeg in factory for whatever reason. Is there a reason you need to use Factory instead of 12.2? Factory is liable to break anything at this time...
No reason, just the fun of it ;) -- Linux User 183145 using KDE4 on a Pentium IV , powered by openSUSE 12.3 Milestone 0 (i586) Kernel: 3.5.0-1-desktop KDE Development Platform: 4.8.5 (4.8.5)) 13:44pm up 2:18, 4 users, load average: 1.62, 1.57, 1.34 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
The problem is that openSUSE only ships random alpha-quality git snapshots of Chromium. They are completely untested and come with bugs over and over again. In the past I already requested that openSUSE should do as every other distribution does and ship the Chromuim version corresponding to the latest Google Chrome release but the package maintainer refuses to and the other people with responsibility within openSUSE let him push random alpha builds as "stable" updates down the users' throat. Basically what he said was: If one expects stability, install Google Chrome. If you want to see that change, make a request on opensuse-factory. Maybe if other people complain as well, he will get off his high horse. Markus Am Freitag 17 August 2012, 14:58:22 schrieb C. Brouerius van Nidek:
An update to chromium-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 resulted in a program missing all images. A re-install with chromium-22.0.1190.0-1.5.3.i586 repaired the issue.
Somebody else with the same effects? Worth a bug report?
chromium-desktop-kde-22.0.1226.0-1.1.i586 -- Linux User 183145 using KDE4 on a Pentium IV , powered by openSUSE 12.3 Milestone 0 (i586) Kernel: 3.5.0-1-desktop KDE Development Platform: 4.8.5 (4.8.5)) 14:53pm up 1:26, 4 users, load average: 0.51, 0.52, 0.61 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Friday 17 Aug 2012 19:06:14 Markus wrote:
The problem is that openSUSE only ships random alpha-quality git snapshots of Chromium. They are completely untested and come with bugs over and over again. In the past I already requested that openSUSE should do as every other distribution does and ship the Chromuim version corresponding to the latest Google Chrome release but the package maintainer refuses to and the other people with responsibility within openSUSE let him push random alpha builds as "stable" updates down the users' throat. Basically what he said was: If one expects stability, install Google Chrome.
If you want to see that change, make a request on opensuse-factory. Maybe if other people complain as well, he will get off his high horse.
No need for polemic statements and melodrama, what you state is not actually what happened. The current maintainer asked the list and from the people that expressed an interest in the matter, the majority wanted to keep having newer builds. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Friday, August 17, 2012 08:31:12 PM Graham Anderson wrote:
On Friday 17 Aug 2012 19:06:14 Markus wrote:
The problem is that openSUSE only ships random alpha-quality git snapshots of Chromium. They are completely untested and come with bugs over and over again. In the past I already requested that openSUSE should do as every other distribution does and ship the Chromuim version corresponding to the latest Google Chrome release but the package maintainer refuses to and the other people with responsibility within openSUSE let him push random alpha builds as "stable" updates down the users' throat. Basically what he said was: If one expects stability, install Google Chrome.
If you want to see that change, make a request on opensuse-factory. Maybe if other people complain as well, he will get off his high horse.
No need for polemic statements and melodrama, what you state is not actually what happened. The current maintainer asked the list and from the people that expressed an interest in the matter, the majority wanted to keep having newer builds.
As a matter of fact, I have nothing against having newer builds as long as they work as expected. Just found an update from Chromium but that did not change anything at all. No images and no thumbnails in the New Tab . A new problem with the latest build is that it is using about 60% of my CPU for over an half hour now. Will kill it and use Konquerer until Chromium starts working as expected. -- Linux User 183145 using KDE4 on a Pentium IV , powered by openSUSE 12.3 Milestone 0 (i586) Kernel: 3.5.0-1-desktop KDE Development Platform: 4.8.5 (4.8.5)) 11:51am up 0:25, 3 users, load average: 2.34, 2.69, 2.57 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
Am Samstag 18 August 2012, 12:06:36 schrieb C. Brouerius van Nidek:
A new problem with the latest build is that it is using about 60% of my CPU for over an half hour now. Will kill it and use Konquerer until Chromium starts working as expected.
Until it breaks again. As I wrote: openSUSE gets random untested and alpha- quality git snapshots, openSUSE is the only major distribution to ship those snapshots exclusively and it will stay that way as long as I stay the only one who ever complained about that. The opensuse-factory mailing list is the place to do so. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 22:14:24 Markus wrote:
Until it breaks again. As I wrote: openSUSE gets random untested and alpha- quality git snapshots, openSUSE is the only major distribution to ship those snapshots exclusively and it will stay that way as long as I stay the only one who ever complained about that. The opensuse-factory mailing list is the place to do so.
As you feel that strong about it, then why don't you provide and maintain a package chromium-stable, which is then based on the released snapshots. You can maintain it in network:chromium if you want so that it would be easy for people to download it (if they are interested). I find your statements quite insulting as that I did react on your request and put it to the opensuse-factory ML to see what other people wanted to have. The clear majority there asked to continue with providing snapshots. The issue with not showing images is clearly due to the issue with libjpeg8. It should be checked which version is installed and which version is provided by Factory. In most cased libjpeg8 needs to be downgraded in order to get a working system again. Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
Am Sonntag 19 August 2012, 14:17:27 schrieb Raymond Wooninck:
As you feel that strong about it, then why don't you provide and maintain a package chromium-stable, which is then based on the released snapshots. You can maintain it in network:chromium if you want so that it would be easy for people to download it (if they are interested).
Because stable packages do not belong in some add-on repo. Stable builds need to be in the main repo and unstable ones in an add-on repo. The policy of allowing alpha-quality git snapshots into the main update repo is simply wrong and I will not affirm it by packaging the stable release in an add-on repo. It was already decided that even if I or someone else ever packaged the stable release, it will never become the default one because downgrading is said to be unacceptable. At least have the decency to rename your package to chromium-unstable after now you've admitted that there are actually stable Chromuim releases. (A fact that you denied last time.)
I find your statements quite insulting as that I did react on your request and put it to the opensuse-factory ML to see what other people wanted to have. The clear majority there asked to continue with providing snapshots.
Yes, the majority did. That's why I wrote "it will stay that way as long as I stay the only one who ever complained about that". In every democratic system one is allowed to campaign for a change in majority and that's what I did when I wrote to Nidek that he should complain on opensuse-factory about this. End of story. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Sunday, August 19, 2012 16:07:57 Markus wrote:
At least have the decency to rename your package to chromium-unstable after now you've admitted that there are actually stable Chromuim releases. (A fact that you denied last time.)
Maybe you should have a look at the following link. Maybe then you understand that it is not me that is indication that there is no stable Chromium release. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Google-Chrome-vs-Chromium-Understanding-Stabl... Beta-Dev-Releases-and-Version-No-140060.shtml It is clearly stated that Chromium by itself is already unstable and that for stable releases you should get Chrome instead. Just to get some facts straight. And that is my end of the story. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Sunday 19 Aug 2012 16:07:57 Markus wrote:
Am Sonntag 19 August 2012, 14:17:27 schrieb Raymond Wooninck:
As you feel that strong about it, then why don't you provide and maintain a package chromium-stable, which is then based on the released snapshots. You can maintain it in network:chromium if you want so that it would be easy for people to download it (if they are interested).
Because stable packages do not belong in some add-on repo. Stable builds need to be in the main repo and unstable ones in an add-on repo.
The policy of allowing alpha-quality git snapshots into the main update repo is simply wrong and I will not affirm it by packaging the stable release in an add-on repo. It was already decided that even if I or someone else ever packaged the stable release, it will never become the default one because downgrading is said to be unacceptable. At least have the decency to rename your package to chromium-unstable after now you've admitted that there are actually stable Chromuim releases. (A fact that you denied last time.)
Markus, please raise the level of discourse in your future mails to the project by a factor of 3 or 4. There is no need to question other contributors' decency or accuse them of lying.
I find your statements quite insulting as that I did react on your request and put it to the opensuse-factory ML to see what other people wanted to have. The clear majority there asked to continue with providing snapshots.
I find Markus' tone quite unpleasant too. Recognise that large parts of the openSUSE project are a meritocracy and flaming productive and useful contributors because you disagree with their approach will get your views nowhere. Will -- Will Stephenson, openSUSE Board, Booster, KDE Developer SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
participants (6)
-
C. Brouerius van Nidek -
Graham Anderson -
Ismail Doenmez -
Markus -
Raymond Wooninck -
Will Stephenson