Feature changed by: Genix Info (genixinfo) Feature #312714, revision 3 Title: openSUSE Linux 12.1: Create a new AppArmor. openSUSE Distribution: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Genix Info (genixinfo) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: My suggestion is to join all the features of AppArmor 2.3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppArmor) ,with SELinux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELinux) , the MSEC (http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/msec) , the TOMOYO Linux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOMOYO_Linux) and grsecurity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grsecurity) , after this union of features, it would create a new AppArmor 3, more everything that was spoken in the feature: 312708 (312708) + Discussion: + #1: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-05 17:58:09) + See this link: http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/pre-release-beta/... + (http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/pre-release-beta/...) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/312714

Feature changed by: Genix Info (genixinfo) Feature #312714, revision 5 Title: openSUSE Linux 12.1: Create a new AppArmor. openSUSE Distribution: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Genix Info (genixinfo) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: My suggestion is to join all the features of AppArmor 2.3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppArmor) ,with SELinux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELinux) , the MSEC (http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/msec) , the TOMOYO Linux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOMOYO_Linux) and grsecurity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grsecurity) , after this union of features, it would create a new AppArmor 3, more everything that was spoken in the feature: 312708 (312708) Discussion: #1: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-05 17:58:09) See this link: http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/pre-release-beta/... (http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/pre-release-beta/...) #2: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-05 17:58:49) My suggestion is to complement what exists, to get better: AppArmor 3 + #3: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-06 17:39:02) + About AppArmor, I summarize what is needed in some links: chkrootkit + (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chkrootkit) , rkhunter + (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rkhunter) , MAC + (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_access_control) , RBAC + (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-based_access_control) and ACLs + (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_control_list) . A review on the + subject: Linux Kernel Security (SELinux vs AppArmor vs Grsecurity) (http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/selinux-vs-apparmor-vs-grsecurity.html) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/312714

Feature changed by: Genix Info (genixinfo) Feature #312714, revision 8 Title: openSUSE Linux 12.1: Create a new AppArmor. openSUSE Distribution: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Genix Info (genixinfo) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: My suggestion is to join all the features of AppArmor 2.3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppArmor) ,with SELinux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELinux) , the MSEC (http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/msec) , the TOMOYO Linux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOMOYO_Linux) and grsecurity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grsecurity) , after this union of features, it would create a new AppArmor 3, more everything that was spoken in the feature: 312708 (312708) Discussion: #1: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-05 17:58:09) See this link: http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/pre-release-beta/... (http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/pre-release-beta/...) #2: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-05 17:58:49) My suggestion is to complement what exists, to get better: AppArmor 3 #3: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-06 17:39:02) About AppArmor, I summarize what is needed in some links: chkrootkit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chkrootkit) , rkhunter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rkhunter) , MAC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_access_control) , RBAC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-based_access_control) and ACLs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_control_list) . A review on the subject: Linux Kernel Security (SELinux vs AppArmor vs Grsecurity) (http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/selinux-vs-apparmor-vs-grsecurity.html) #4: Joseph Mitzen (duncreg) (2011-08-06 21:42:16) If you can be allowed to make multiple feature requests that only consist of naming every single product in a category and suggesting the openSUSE team merge them all together, I'm going to file a request in identical format suggesting we take Windows 7, openSUSE, BSD, Android, iOS, WebOS and OSX and combine them together. + #5: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-07 01:05:28) + You want me to be more specific, so here it goes: Rookit + (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit) attacks. I know, I gotta go + straight at the root of my idea. Regarding the posts on the forum, I + think the more people thinking, faster, you arrive at a consensus. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/312714

Feature changed by: Karl Cheng (qantas94heavy) Feature #312714, revision 11 Title: openSUSE Linux 12.1: Create a new AppArmor. - openSUSE Distribution: Unconfirmed + openSUSE Distribution: Rejected by Karl Cheng (qantas94heavy) + reject reason: No clear rationale given. Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Genix Info (genixinfo) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: My suggestion is to join all the features of AppArmor 2.3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppArmor) ,with SELinux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELinux) , the MSEC (http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/msec) , the TOMOYO Linux (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOMOYO_Linux) and grsecurity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grsecurity) , after this union of features, it would create a new AppArmor 3, more everything that was spoken in the feature: 312708 (312708) Discussion: #1: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-05 17:58:09) See this link: http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/pre-release-beta/... (http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/pre-release-beta/...) #2: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-05 17:58:49) My suggestion is to complement what exists, to get better: AppArmor 3 #3: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-06 17:39:02) About AppArmor, I summarize what is needed in some links: chkrootkit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chkrootkit) , rkhunter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rkhunter) , MAC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_access_control) , RBAC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-based_access_control) and ACLs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_control_list) . A review on the subject: Linux Kernel Security (SELinux vs AppArmor vs Grsecurity) (http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/selinux-vs-apparmor-vs-grsecurity.html) #4: Joseph Mitzen (duncreg) (2011-08-06 21:42:16) If you can be allowed to make multiple feature requests that only consist of naming every single product in a category and suggesting the openSUSE team merge them all together, I'm going to file a request in identical format suggesting we take Windows 7, openSUSE, BSD, Android, iOS, WebOS and OSX and combine them together. #5: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-07 01:05:28) You want me to be more specific, so here it goes: Rookit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit) attacks. I know, I gotta go straight at the root of my idea. Regarding the posts on the forum, I think the more people thinking, faster, you arrive at a consensus. #6: Genix Info (genixinfo) (2011-08-09 21:02:11) I have no pseudocode, I do not want to generalize. I suggest that AppArmor, act as the MSEC. See how it works: The MSEC is a software that has some safety rules, safety rules among these is chkrootkit. The MSEC monitors and reports any changes that interfere with system security. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/312714