LibreOffice: We're switching, yes? If so, testers look forward to it by M3? I assume at this early stage there is little difference (user-facing) between LO and OOo other than branding. But it would be good to know for bug reporting purposes. Last, are we looking at xOffice 3.3 or 3.2.1 in the end? Given our freeze dates I assume things are heading for 3.3 but with this recent shift upstream I'd like to get some clarity. Thanks for your input, Refilwe openSUSE Testing Team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Refilwe Seete
LibreOffice: We're switching, yes?
If so, testers look forward to it by M3? I assume at this early stage there is little difference (user-facing) between LO and OOo other than branding. But it would be good to know for bug reporting purposes.
LO is more or less go-oo from what I've read. (ie. The LO team already accepted all (most?) the go-oo patches right off the bat) Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 10:49:03 Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Refilwe Seete
wrote: LibreOffice: We're switching, yes?
If so, testers look forward to it by M3? I assume at this early stage there is little difference (user-facing) between LO and OOo other than branding. But it would be good to know for bug reporting purposes.
LO is more or less go-oo from what I've read.
Yes, this is how I understand it as well. Upgraded on the community and legal side no doubt (independent, non-profit Document Foundation; no copyright assignment; etc.), but at the code level it seems to be Go-oo for now. However, this still leaves a question about bug-reporting. Should we continue reporting issues to the openSUSE/Novell tracker or should testers divert to the LibreOffice/Document Foundation/FreeDesktop tracker? For now things are straight forward, Factory still utilises Go-oo 3.2.1. But if openSUSE 11.4 is going to use LibreOffice 3.3 then I'd like to test and report on that instead (I'm sure others both in and out of the Testing Team would as well). Refilwe openSUSE Testing Team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Moin, On Sep 28, 10 13:10:46 -0400, Refilwe Seete wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 10:49:03 Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Refilwe Seete
wrote: LibreOffice: We're switching, yes?
If so, testers look forward to it by M3? I assume at this early stage there is little difference (user-facing) between LO and OOo other than branding. But it would be good to know for bug reporting purposes.
LO is more or less go-oo from what I've read.
Right. And I personally expect (but of course can't gurantee or say it for sure) and hpe that those two will stay close together. But that#s just my personal, private hope.
Yes, this is how I understand it as well. Upgraded on the community and legal side no doubt (independent, non-profit Document Foundation; no copyright assignment; etc.), but at the code level it seems to be Go-oo for now.
However, this still leaves a question about bug-reporting. Should we continue reporting issues to the openSUSE/Novell tracker or should testers divert to the LibreOffice/Document Foundation/FreeDesktop tracker?
Do it like you did in the past when it was labeled 'OpenOffice.org'. If you filled bugs then to the openSUSE/Novell bugzilla because you used that version - continue doing so. If you got the version from DocumentFoundation, file the bug there. The bugfixes will get incorporated into each other packages. Maybe with a little delay depending on the frequency of packages being created, but that should not be too much.
For now things are straight forward, Factory still utilises Go-oo 3.2.1. But if openSUSE 11.4 is going to use LibreOffice 3.3 then I'd like to test and report on that instead (I'm sure others both in and out of the Testing Team would as well).
The switch to 3.3 in Factory will surely come. I just don't know yet when :) Stefan -- Stefan Behlert, SUSE LINUX - a Novell business, Project Manager Desktop Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany Phone +49-911-74053-0 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nuernberg; GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Moin moin, Am 28/09/10 20:12, schrieb Stefan Behlert:
Moin, On Sep 28, 10 13:10:46 -0400, Refilwe Seete wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Refilwe Seete
wrote: LibreOffice: We're switching, yes? [...] However, this still leaves a question about bug-reporting. Should we continue reporting issues to the openSUSE/Novell tracker or should testers
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 10:49:03 Greg Freemyer wrote: divert to the LibreOffice/Document Foundation/FreeDesktop tracker?
Do it like you did in the past when it was labeled 'OpenOffice.org'. If you filled bugs then to the openSUSE/Novell bugzilla because you used that version - continue doing so. If you got the version from DocumentFoundation, file the bug there. The bugfixes will get incorporated into each other packages. Maybe with a little delay depending on the frequency of packages being created, but that should not be too much.
[...] What about the name/label of the group in Novells bugzilla? Changing it to "OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice"/"LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org"? As Novell is one of the supporters of "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" (- this 'new' branch - the most part of the old team under a new name - whatever you like to call or describe that phenomenon... ) they might want to change that label of their bugzilla (,too). Regards pistazienfresser (Martin) See also: * Thread: Naissance de LibreOffice (fr) http://forums.opensuse.org/other-languages/francais-french/information/actua... * Thread: OpenOffice.org forsakes Oracle, forms new foundation and fork (en) http://forums.opensuse.org/english/news/tech-news/447205-openoffice-org-fors... * Thread: LibreOffice : nur Fork oder Nachfolger von OpenOffice.org ? (de) http://forums.opensuse.org/other-languages/deutsch-german/community-talk/ank... -- - openSUSE profile: https://users.opensuse.org/show/pistazienfresser -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Hi guys, On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:49 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Refilwe Seete
wrote: LibreOffice: We're switching, yes?
If so, testers look forward to it by M3? I assume at this early stage there is little difference (user-facing) between LO and OOo other than branding. But it would be good to know for bug reporting purposes.
Ah - it'd be great to get it packaged for OpenSUSE so we can ship it first / early :-) and it should not be at all difficult.
(ie. The LO team already accepted all (most?) the go-oo patches right off the bat)
Certainly, lots of patches have been merged, many are still pending; but LO is no go-oo :-) It should become a superset of all things OOo though. [ I'm excited about it anyhow ]. The other thing to do (plug plug) is to come to the openSUSE conference to hear more about it ... in a burst of prescience there was a LibreOffice track scheduled there before it was even announced :-) HTH, Michael. -- michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
participants (5)
-
Greg Freemyer
-
Michael Meeks
-
pistazienfresser (see profile)
-
Refilwe Seete
-
Stefan Behlert