Hello, I wanted to install factory, but there are no software selections available. Could you make some available? Thanks, bye, -- CzP http://peter.czanik.hu/
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:05:14PM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
Hello, I wanted to install factory, but there are no software selections available. Could you make some available? Thanks, bye,
Read my mail from two days ago: The repository is currently broken and thus not usable for installation anyway. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Hi, On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:05:14PM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
I wanted to install factory, but there are no software selections available. Could you make some available? Thanks, bye,
Read my mail from two days ago: The repository is currently broken and thus not usable for installation anyway.
This sentence is by far nearer to the facts than your mail from two days ago. If you had spoken clearer before, I would have had a chance to recover at ftp.gwdg.de (my rsync does not delete directly) - but now it is too late. The "true" SL-OSS-factory (without the drpmsync directory) did shrink from 30 to 23 GB: 060113.0326 opensuse-f size: 30841694403 bytes. 060113.1607 opensuse-f size: 29206535189 bytes. 060114.0859 opensuse-f size: 23443066739 bytes. and nothing has happened since then... Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:05:14PM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
I wanted to install factory, but there are no software selections available. Could you make some available? Thanks, bye,
Read my mail from two days ago: The repository is currently broken and thus not usable for installation anyway.
This sentence is by far nearer to the facts than your mail from two days ago. If you had spoken clearer before, I would have had a chance to recover at ftp.gwdg.de (my rsync does not delete directly) - but now it is too late.
The "true" SL-OSS-factory (without the drpmsync directory) did shrink from 30 to 23 GB:
060113.0326 opensuse-f size: 30841694403 bytes. 060113.1607 opensuse-f size: 29206535189 bytes. 060114.0859 opensuse-f size: 23443066739 bytes.
and nothing has happened since then...
We're still recovering, should go out again today, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2006 20:32 schrieb Robert Schiele:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:05:14PM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
Hello, I wanted to install factory, but there are no software selections available. Could you make some available? Thanks, bye,
Read my mail from two days ago: The repository is currently broken and thus not usable for installation anyway.
we are back again. (This was caused by a change to prepare our public build service btw. I will disable automatically syncing before we the next large to avoid this the next time) bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany email: adrian@suse.de
Hi, On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Adrian [utf-8] Schröter wrote:
Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2006 20:32 schrieb Robert Schiele:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:05:14PM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
I wanted to install factory, but there are no software selections available. Could you make some available? Thanks, bye,
Read my mail from two days ago: The repository is currently broken and thus not usable for installation anyway.
we are back again.
(This was caused by a change to prepare our public build service btw. I will disable automatically syncing before we the next large to avoid this the next time)
Immediate after seeing this announcement, I started to rsync from stage.opensuse.org. Now after finishing successfully, I started a "control run", and I see lots of packages come in again, but lots are uptodate. The newly arriving files have exactly the same name as the former ones. Have there been package replacements without changing version numbers? Have there been timestamp changes with existing files? Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:50:08PM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Have there been package replacements without changing version numbers?
Most of the package upgrades are without changing the version number because the version number does not change when the package upgrade was only triggered because of a package update the package depends on without a change in the package itself. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Hi, On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:50:08PM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Have there been package replacements without changing version numbers?
Most of the package upgrades are without changing the version number because the version number does not change when the package upgrade was only triggered because of a package update the package depends on without a change in the package itself.
So there was a new delivery this afternoon, some hours after the announcement? Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:41:32PM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
So there was a new delivery this afternoon, some hours after the announcement?
Yes. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Hi, On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:41:32PM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
So there was a new delivery this afternoon, some hours after the announcement?
Yes.
Good. Next question: is this the inst-source of beta1? Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
hi SUSE, On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:41:32PM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
So there was a new delivery this afternoon, some hours after the announcement?
Yes.
Good. Next question: is this the inst-source of beta1?
No answer yet - what's up at SUSE? The time plan is hurt, and nothing but silence. Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
Hi Eberhard
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Robert Schiele wrote: Next question: is this the inst-source of beta1?
No answer yet - what's up at SUSE? The time plan is hurt, and nothing but silence.
Sorry for the late answer. Our project managers have decided to delay Beta1. Reason: a bug in insserv. The "insserv" program determines the order of the init scripts. A bug in it results in the wrong order of init scripts, which results in a partially or completely unusable system. The package maintainer of insserv is debugging it. Trying obvious things like going back to the old insserv did not help, so it seems it was a dormant bug which was only triggered now. Side-effects of hundreds of changes we did for Beta1. But don't panic: Just the usual chaos at the beginning of a new release. ;-) Cheers, Lars
Lars Rupp
Hi Eberhard
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Robert Schiele wrote: Next question: is this the inst-source of beta1?
No answer yet - what's up at SUSE? The time plan is hurt, and nothing but silence.
Sorry for the late answer. Our project managers have decided to delay Beta1. Reason: a bug in insserv.
Which leads to the scripts started in the wrong order, so first postfix, then nfs, and finally the network ;-(
The "insserv" program determines the order of the init scripts. A bug in it results in the wrong order of init scripts, which results in a partially or completely unusable system. The package maintainer of insserv is debugging it. Trying obvious things like going back to the old insserv did not help, so it seems it was a dormant bug which was only triggered now. Side-effects of hundreds of changes we did for Beta1.
Yes - and therefore Beta1 will be delayed by at least one day... Which also gives us time to reorder some packages on the CDs so that a default GNOME/KDE installation (in englisch or german) will only use CDs 1-3...
But don't panic: Just the usual chaos at the beginning of a new release. ;-)
That's what I hope as well ;-). Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
2006/1/19, Lars Rupp
Hi Eberhard
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Robert Schiele wrote: Next question: is this the inst-source of beta1?
No answer yet - what's up at SUSE? The time plan is hurt, and nothing but silence.
Sorry for the late answer. Our project managers have decided to delay Beta1. Reason: a bug in insserv.
The "insserv" program determines the order of the init scripts. A bug in it results in the wrong order of init scripts, which results in a partially or completely unusable system. The package maintainer of insserv is debugging it. Trying obvious things like going back to the old insserv did not help, so it seems it was a dormant bug which was only triggered now. Side-effects of hundreds of changes we did for Beta1.
But don't panic: Just the usual chaos at the beginning of a new release. ;-)
Hi! What method do You use to update the installed system? Smart do'nt find any new package. How can I setup smart, to use as a repository http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source The last weekend, I made the update via apt-get, and the system becomes very slowly loading KDE. Can You help me in the setup of the smart update? Thanks
participants (7)
-
Adrian Schröter -
Andreas Jaeger -
Eberhard Moenkeberg -
Juan Erbes -
Lars Rupp -
Peter Czanik -
Robert Schiele