[opensuse-factory] Re: Request 746309 created by mcepl (submit openSUSE:Factory/python-Parsley)
Hi Matej, until the Group issue dispute isn't resolved properly, would you please use a spec-cleaner version, that doesn't remove the Group specification. Thanks, Pete Am Donnerstag, 7. November 2019, 16:04:44 CET schrieb Matej Cepl:
Visit https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/746309
Description: - Run through spec-cleaner
Actions: - submit devel:languages:python/python-Parsley => openSUSE:Factory/python-Parsley
changes files: -------------- --- python-Parsley.changes +++ python-Parsley.changes @@ -1,0 +2,5 @@ +Thu Nov 7 15:02:03 UTC 2019 - Matej Cepl
+ +- Run through spec-cleaner + +------------------------------------------------------------------- spec files: ----------- --- python-Parsley.spec +++ python-Parsley.spec @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # # spec file for package python-Parsley # -# Copyright (c) 2018 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany. +# Copyright (c) 2019 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany. # Copyright (c) 2013 LISA GmbH, Bingen, Germany. # # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ # license that conforms to the Open Source Definition (Version 1.9) # published by the Open Source Initiative.
-# Please submit bugfixes or comments via http://bugs.opensuse.org/ +# Please submit bugfixes or comments via https://bugs.opensuse.org/ #
@@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ Release: 0 Summary: PEG algorithm based parser generator License: MIT -Group: Development/Libraries/Python -URL: http://github.com/washort/parsley +URL: https://github.com/washort/parsley Source: https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/P/%{oname}/%{oname}-%{version}.tar. gz BuildRequires: %{python_module Twisted} BuildRequires: %{python_module pytest} @@ -74,8 +73,8 @@
%check export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 -%python_expand PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{$python_sitelib} py.test-%{$python_version} ometa/test -%python_expand PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{$python_sitelib} py.test-%{$python_version} terml/test +%pytest ometa/test +%pytest terml/test
%files %{python_files} %license LICENSE
To REVIEW against the previous version: osc request show --diff 746309
To ACCEPT the request: osc request accept 746309 --message="reviewed ok."
To DECLINE the request: osc request decline 746309 --message="declined for reason xyz (see ... for background / policy / ...)."
To REVOKE the request: osc request revoke 746309 --message="retracted because ..., sorry / thx / see better version ..."
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi, On 07 Nov 16:58, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi Matej,
until the Group issue dispute isn't resolved properly, would you please use a spec-cleaner version, that doesn't remove the Group specification.
Had a similar discussion the other day and we consider this resolved now with the Board's decision. Regards, ismail -- Aus so krummem Holze, als woraus der Mensch gemacht ist, kann nichts ganz Gerades gezimmert werden. — Immanuel Kant SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Hello, Am Donnerstag, 7. November 2019, 17:01:53 CET schrieb İsmail Dönmez:
On 07 Nov 16:58, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
until the Group issue dispute isn't resolved properly, would you please use a spec-cleaner version, that doesn't remove the Group specification. Had a similar discussion the other day and we consider this resolved now with the Board's decision.
The board decision is that (quoting from Simon's mail) ... including groups in spec files should now be optional with the final decision resting with the maintainer "Optional" means nobody will force you to keep or add a Group line, but OTOH it also means you don't have to remove it - and IMHO it's perfectly fine to decline a request that would remove it if you don't like that for whatever reason. (IMHO, even "removing the group is a bad idea" is a valid reason ;-) A few sidenotes: - AFAIK spec-cleaner has a lame excuse^W^Wcommand-line option to keep the group, so it's at least technically possible - I'm afraid I know the maintainer of spec-cleaner good enough to know that he won't change the default behaviour - personally, I've had enough "fun" with spec-cleaner, but solved everything with "zypper rm spec-cleaner" ;-) I hope this mail clarifies things a bit, and doesn't open a fresh can of worms ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- 93: Emacs Warum werden die Funktionen nicht mit Passwörtern versehen? [Frank Klemm] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
Christian Boltz
-
Hans-Peter Jansen
-
İsmail Dönmez