[opensuse-factory] rpm update to 4.10.2 still possible?
Hi, while debugging a kiwi build issue I noticed that this is a bug in rpm 4.10, which we have in openSUSE Factory. It is already fixed in 4.10.2, which got released already a few weeks ago. I've updated the Factory rpm package to 4.10.2, which includes the bugfix that blocks ARM builds currently, but now I learned that we have already a version freeze for 12.3 in place. Looking at the changes between 4.10.0 and 4.10.2, all are serious bugfixes or regression fixes, one is even tagged as a security fix. so we'll likely end up with something very close to 4.10.2 anyway. The package is currently in devel:Factory:ARM and in openSUSE:Factory:ARM, as I need it to build proper images. Any recommendation? Thanks, Dirk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mi 02 Jan 2013 16:13:35 CET Dirk Müller
Looking at the changes between 4.10.0 and 4.10.2, all are serious bugfixes or regression fixes, one is even tagged as a security fix. so we'll likely end up with something very close to 4.10.2 anyway.
The package is currently in devel:Factory:ARM and in openSUSE:Factory:ARM, as I need it to build proper images.
Any recommendation?
My suggestion would be: submit. But as I'm not in the "distribution release team" (or however Coolo and Ismail are named today), I like to ask you to get an answer from them... :-) With kind regards, Lars -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 03-01-2013 03:27, Lars Vogdt wrote:
On Mi 02 Jan 2013 16:13:35 CET Dirk Müller
wrote: Looking at the changes between 4.10.0 and 4.10.2, all are serious bugfixes or regression fixes, one is even tagged as a security fix. so we'll likely end up with something very close to 4.10.2 anyway.
The package is currently in devel:Factory:ARM and in openSUSE:Factory:ARM, as I need it to build proper images.
Any recommendation?
My suggestion would be: submit.
But as I'm not in the "distribution release team" (or however Coolo and Ismail are named today), I like to ask you to get an answer from them... :-)
This makes sense for me too but its coolo's call. Regards. -- Ismail Dönmez - openSUSE Team SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 03.01.2013 10:35, Ismail Doenmez wrote:
On 03-01-2013 03:27, Lars Vogdt wrote:
On Mi 02 Jan 2013 16:13:35 CET Dirk Müller
wrote: Looking at the changes between 4.10.0 and 4.10.2, all are serious bugfixes or regression fixes, one is even tagged as a security fix. so we'll likely end up with something very close to 4.10.2 anyway.
The package is currently in devel:Factory:ARM and in openSUSE:Factory:ARM, as I need it to build proper images.
Any recommendation?
My suggestion would be: submit.
But as I'm not in the "distribution release team" (or however Coolo and Ismail are named today), I like to ask you to get an answer from them... :-)
Go for it. To make this more transparent to people: The feature freeze marks the time when I want to see a discussion about version updates instead of "just go for it". So in case like this when we have a real bug with a real fix and a version update that goes with it, we will check how big the chance is that we break other stuff and then go for it. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (4)
-
Dirk Müller
-
Ismail Doenmez
-
Lars Vogdt
-
Stephan Kulow