[opensuse-factory] New package: QupZilla

Javier Llorente

12 Feb 2014 12 Feb '14

20:50

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone! I would like to get QupZilla into Factory. QupZilla is a lightweight QtWebKit-based Web browser. Some of its features: - - Speed dial - - RSS reader - - KDE integration (notifications, KWallet) - - Ad-block - - Click2Flash - - Web inspector License: GPL 3.0+ For more details, please take a look at http://www.qupzilla.com/ Greetings, - -- Javier Llorente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlL70IkACgkQdV3zWWOPFxTl4QCeM6bNl3lzUeD+AIa2u+ZLmyyx IvoAniioM5K5B5WV+B16KzDbg4/zbuck =eGLA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Show replies by date

Raymond Wooninck

12 Feb 12 Feb

20:59

On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...

Hello everyone!

I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Hi Javier, Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory ? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ? Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :) Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Dmitriy Perlow

21:15

Raymond Wooninck Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:59:07 +0300:

...

On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...
Hello everyone!

I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Hi Javier,

Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory ? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ?

Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :)

Regards

Raymond

It doesn't require kde libs and it is imho the most rapidly growing QtWebKit browser. Anyway QupZilla is a great package, let it be in Factory. -- Best regards, Dmitriy DA(P).DarkneSS Perlow @ Linux x64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Patrick Shanahan

21:26

* Dmitriy Perlow [02-12-14 15:17]:

...

Raymond Wooninck Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:59:07 +0300:

...
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...
I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ?

Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :)

It doesn't require kde libs and it is imho the most rapidly growing QtWebKit browser. Anyway QupZilla is a great package, let it be in Factory.

+1 -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Dsant

21:27

Le 12/02/2014 21:15, Dmitriy Perlow a écrit :

...

Raymond Wooninck Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:59:07 +0300:

...
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...
Hello everyone!

I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Hi Javier,

Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory ? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ?

Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :)

Regards

Raymond

It doesn't require kde libs and it is imho the most rapidly growing QtWebKit browser. Anyway QupZilla is a great package, let it be in Factory.

I agree, I was interested by it too these days. -- (o_ //\ Dsant, from Lyon, France V_/_ forum@votreservice.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Javier Llorente

21:46

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El 12/02/14 20:59, Raymond Wooninck escribió:

...

On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...
Hello everyone!

I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Hi Javier,

Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory ? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ?

Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :)

Sure :) Well, I think it has a lot of potential. IMO, it's quite fast and feature-rich. As it has already been said, KDE libs are optional (unless you want to use the KWallet plugin). Konqueror and Rekonq are KDE players, while QupZilla can play in the KDE team or in its own. AFAIK, there's no plain Qt-based Web browser on openSUSE (yet). Regards, - -- Javier Llorente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlL73YkACgkQdV3zWWOPFxTgjACffZdSWVfurJ1JPKRaY1OkMPx0 ZDgAnRbg5k/I3Y2V4Ii+w90C0HCPXhhM =Ha9j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Malcolm

22:26

New subject: [opensuse-factory] Re: New package: QupZilla

On Wed 12 Feb 2014 09:46:01 PM CST, Javier Llorente wrote:

...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

El 12/02/14 20:59, Raymond Wooninck escribió:

...
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...
Hello everyone!

I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Hi Javier,

Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory ? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ?

Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :)

Sure :)

Well, I think it has a lot of potential. IMO, it's quite fast and feature-rich. As it has already been said, KDE libs are optional (unless you want to use the KWallet plugin). Konqueror and Rekonq are KDE players, while QupZilla can play in the KDE team or in its own. AFAIK, there's no plain Qt-based Web browser on openSUSE (yet).

Regards, - -- Javier Llorente

Hi There is otter-browser (qt 5.2.x) in the wings, then on the gtk side is luakit.... -- Cheers Malcolm °¿° SUSE Knowledge Partner (Linux Counter #276890) openSUSE 13.1 (Bottle) (x86_64) GNOME 3.10.2 Kernel 3.11.10-7-desktop up 16:20, 3 users, load average: 0.25, 0.13, 0.07 CPU Intel® B840@1.9GHz | GPU Intel® Sandybridge Mobile -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Javier Llorente

13 Feb 13 Feb

00:27

New subject: [opensuse-factory] Re: New package: QupZilla

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El 12/02/14 22:26, Malcolm escribió:

...

On Wed 12 Feb 2014 09:46:01 PM CST, Javier Llorente wrote:

...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

El 12/02/14 20:59, Raymond Wooninck escribió:

...
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...
Hello everyone!

I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Hi Javier,

Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory ? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ?

Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :)

Sure :)

Well, I think it has a lot of potential. IMO, it's quite fast and feature-rich. As it has already been said, KDE libs are optional (unless you want to use the KWallet plugin). Konqueror and Rekonq are KDE players, while QupZilla can play in the KDE team or in its own. AFAIK, there's no plain Qt-based Web browser on openSUSE (yet).

Regards, - -- Javier Llorente

Hi There is otter-browser (qt 5.2.x) in the wings, then on the gtk side is luakit....

Interesting. Thanks for telling, - -- Javier Llorente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlL8A1MACgkQdV3zWWOPFxSNpgCgieJhVdgiY4bVJ3q5XVVUkGrF OJIAn3kLoJTW6qMvFz2TcCWOVrTTceqw =HatJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Javier Llorente

12 Feb 12 Feb

22:42

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El 12/02/14 21:46, Javier Llorente escribió:

...

El 12/02/14 20:59, Raymond Wooninck escribió:

...
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...
Hello everyone!

I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Hi Javier,

...
Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory ? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ?

...
Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :)

Sure :)

Well, I think it has a lot of potential. IMO, it's quite fast and feature-rich. As it has already been said, KDE libs are optional (unless you want to use the KWallet plugin). Konqueror and Rekonq are KDE players, while QupZilla can play in the KDE team or in its own. AFAIK, there's no plain Qt-based Web browser on openSUSE (yet).

Due to the good feedback I have created the SR #222083. Greetings - -- Javier Llorente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlL76tYACgkQdV3zWWOPFxSMdgCfXbuqFGY5Q3VffHUF1beawA0c 0zoAnApHZtvclb+e/f0KTQj3C86eZYVH =Cm5p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Javier Llorente

13 Feb 13 Feb

09:29

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El 12/02/14 22:42, Javier Llorente escribió:

...

El 12/02/14 21:46, Javier Llorente escribió:

...
El 12/02/14 20:59, Raymond Wooninck escribió:

...
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 20:50:33 Javier Llorente wrote:

...
Hello everyone!

I would like to get QupZilla into Factory.

Hi Javier,

...
...
Could you indicate a little more why you would want it into Factory ? What advantages does it have over Rekonq and Konqueror, which are also based on QtWebKit ?

...
...
Not that I am against it moving to Factory, but it would be good to know :)

...
Sure :)

...
Well, I think it has a lot of potential. IMO, it's quite fast and feature-rich. As it has already been said, KDE libs are optional (unless you want to use the KWallet plugin). Konqueror and Rekonq are KDE players, while QupZilla can play in the KDE team or in its own. AFAIK, there's no plain Qt-based Web browser on openSUSE (yet).

Due to the good feedback I have created the SR #222083.

I have resubmitted it from the correct devel project (KDE:Extra). It's SR #222122. Cheers, - -- Javier Llorente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlL8gn0ACgkQdV3zWWOPFxRf+wCfd+W8aCpP4jLCb7L7VLjFRO4g DFcAnR2YxDNnuzFoZpfxNqDzwle79w43 =hhfJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

3735

Age (days ago)

3736

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

9 comments

6 participants

participants (6)

Dmitriy Perlow
Dsant
Javier Llorente
Malcolm
Patrick Shanahan
Raymond Wooninck